![]() |
william hague
he is never to be seen , he then pops up about syrian rebels .thats about 3 times ive seen him on the news this year and all he mentions is Syrian rebels.I think this would be a grave mistake giving them weapons.we dont know who they are there are so many factions and nationalities involved.what is it about this obsession about syria:confused:
|
Re: william hague
give it a year and the guns we sell this lot will be shooting at our troops
|
Re: william hague
Agree 100% This is probably about revenue not aid.:rolleyes: The fact such weapons may well be used against British Soldiers in future, means sod all to a Tory.:rolleyes:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
Fact is gents last time I looked we were the second largest armament producer in the world US of A of course holding top spot. ;) |
Re: william hague
Found this too:
. At the end of Labour's first term in office, Campaign Against The Arms Trade (CAAT)'s Chris Wrigley concluded that "repressive behaviour, denial of human rights and absence of democracy were not accepted as being in themselves reasons for blocking sales. It is clear that intervention against the trade is considered to be marginal and exceptional, and permission is the norm." |
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Sheer madness. Has this present government learnt nothing from our disastrous involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan? Here we have this pompous little prat strutting around on the international stage pretending to be a world statesman and for what? We don't even know properly who the Syrian opposition are. We could end up with an Islamist government in that country who are actively promoting the war on terror against us. Even worse, "mission creep" could see our troops in that country, putting their lives on the line for nothing. Meddling in Middle Eastern affairs has brought us grief before and it will again!:(
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
How can it though? If people use a mistake made by someone in the past be it the recent past or distant to say that it is perfectly alright to deliberately make the same mistake again. http://www.smileyvault.com/albums/st...y-sign0171.gif |
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
:bangh8: |
Re: william hague
so giving so called rebels most are foreign to syria and some are allied to al qaeda. that would be mental. i remember Governments arming the Taliban.
|
Re: william hague
our government along with america put sadam in power and look how that turned out
he stopped doing what they wanted so they blamed him for 9/11 and started a war that was probbably the main reason why we couldnt recover after the banks went to crap because it was financially screwing us the only thing the two iraq wars acheived was doubling the cost of filling my car up with fuel |
Re: william hague
too true. assad has a lot of allies in the region.this could open a can of worms and is scary stuff.
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
On TV today, Wm Hague described the Syrian situation as the most pressing problem in the world today. I don't think he is far off being right.
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
I think most people are not taking in to account that Assad's main arms suppliers are Russia and China so we arm rebels they arm Assad and so it goes on and on
|
Re: william hague
I think most people are well aware of that,;) also aware the fact Taliban n the likes are alongside rebels, so we supply them, they kill more of our troops, not rocket science.
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
hell deciding what to make teh kids for tea is more pressing to me than syria. unless of course syria is planning a terrorist attack on my cooker forcing us to have salad then i will agree with Hague %100 |
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
words of wisdom from a brtish government you got to be kidding lmao 2 illigal wars decimated economey solves problems by victimising the vulnerable in socitey pours millions abroad while claiming to be broke hardly any lessons of wisdom there and they are examples from both colours if not all three since libdems are in on teh action as well hahaha taking advice from a british government would be like taking child minding tips from myra hindley |
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
I think ill ask William Hague who the rebels are,he should know shouldn't he? This could lead to the war of all wars:( this is different from Iraq and even Afghanistan .
|
Re: william hague
If the government forces of Syria do not succeed in overcoming the 'rebel' forces which we (amongst others) are 'assisting', the way will be clear to attack Iran - Syria and Iran are close allies.
So this 'help' for the rebels is a preparation for war to subjugate Iran. As long as the Syrian army holds out - the start of WW3 will get postponed. The greed for oil and power is insatiable - sad but true - all populations suffer - war has no winners. |
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
And from Hague's current determination to get us embroiled in Syria, they've learnt absolutely NOWT! |
Re: william hague
Quote:
Or are they the same as your old Tory views? Find someone else whom has already done something wrong and blame them when the party you really support shows intent on making a similar mistake. ;) |
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
if blair had stood in parliament with no valid reason to go to war i doubt any party would have supported a war blair is a war criminal and not only has the blood of many iraq civilians on his hands but also the blood of any UK soldier that died in that conflict. besides torys much prefer attacking their own people they get a much better view |
william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
most definatley not but if anything it does prove that our government regardless of party is preppeared to use war as a toy to suit their own personal adgenda |
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
also has anyone else noticed that when a government is worried they may not win the next election wars tend to pop up or threats of inpending doom over war
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
thats the spirit |
Re: william hague
Quote:
Syria may need to be controlled, but not at the cost of one British life, let's make sure of that. |
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
william hague
Quote:
It doesn't matter which party kills our soldiers, it is wrong and looks like it will happen again. Do you really approve of such action? |
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
The full region is like a tinderbox just look at the riots in Istanbul ,all started by a protest about a park .i would avoid the region like the plague as the full region is going to kick off big time.Yahoo! Maps, Driving Directions, and Traffic all these surrounding countries.no wonder Moscow is nervous forgot how close it is to this region
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
Plenty of replies from you defending a Tory but nothing about your parties view! It is a legitimate question and I would have thought easy for you to answer you'll have looked into all of their aspects before joining. Or are we going to have to keep asking you again and again for an answer? Perhaps you would rather avoid the answer, a bit like c'mon and his plan B. :) |
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
Whereas I had aimed my question at you to try and find out what your new parties views are on the subject. I personally wouldn't join a party just to be able to put in a protest vote, I can do that anyway, I would however make sure all their other policies agreed with my mind set before parting with any brass, (perhaps I'm tight, I blame my Scottish Father and my Jewish Mother from Yorkshire). :D |
Re: william hague
Quote:
You are joking, aren't you? We will withdraw from the Social Chapter, We will abolish the Human Rights Act and establish a British Bill of Rights, We will expand the size of the Army, We will abolish Stamp Duty, We will stop foreign criminals using the Human Rights Act to stay in the country.. .and, of course, there's that EU Referendum which he made a "cast-iron promise" on in 2007 and should have been delivered by now. Need I go on? |
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
hes still got one good foot left so expect more from him lol sorry jay mate but on this one your kinda diggin a hole :) meant in the most pokey fun way of course :D:D:D:D |
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
wheres William Hague today:confused:
|
Re: william hague
Cameron and Putin have given a press conference from Downing Street today, both putting their side's point of view. In my opinion, Putin came across with the most rational argument for not arming the rebels, sorry opposition ( Camerons slip of the tongue). Pointing out the Syrian opposition's killing and eating the organs of one of their enemy, which was apparently filmed, he asked are these the people you want to support? He also said blood was on the hands of both sides. Cameron looked very uncomfortable.
|
Re: william hague
fingers crossed camerons refreshments were a little more radioactive than they should have been
|
Re: william hague
Or Putin gave him a playful poke on the bum with his umbrella!
|
Re: william hague
In fairness Putin is evil n clever, Cameron just evil n dumb.
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
Quote:
|
Re: william hague
well he has been shoved now ;) made britain a laughing stock.
|
Re: william hague
Perhaps its so he wont be as high profile,when the crap hits the fan?
|
Re: william hague
There were rumblings last year about Hague not standing at the next election, so I don't know why anyone would think that by moving to a new post that he's been sacked.
There was a list published earlier this month showing the MPs who don't intend standing at the next election which includes several Labour heavyweights. UK Polling Report |
Re: william hague
I fail to see why you should think Hague aint been sacked.:confused:still it takes allsorts.:D
|
Re: william hague
well his replacement has done more in a week than hague done in 4 years;)
|
Re: william hague
Hang on a minute....are you actually saying that a cabinet minsiter in a tory led Coalition government gets your approval????
I think I am going to have to get my smelling salts out. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:23. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com