![]() |
Re: Grangemouth
Quote:
On the other hand, I'd still like the company to produce some figures on the profitability of the plant. Share holder gluttony dictates too much company policy and encourages some to "renegotiate" long held contract conditions. Such tactics are always top-down from corporations to individuals. I propose a UK version of the Arab Spring, perhaps a Britsh Winter where millions abandon major power suppliers and go to smaller independents as an alternative. Unfortunately apathy, mine included will see that this doesn't happen. First world problems aren't motivational enough. Now where's my soapbox?:rolleyes: |
Re: Grangemouth
Quote:
|
Re: Grangemouth
Thing is though wi pensions having to be reduced,is in the 80s/90s Greedy barstward firms took "Pension Holidays" the reason given was there was too much money in the kitty n it would "NEVER" all be needed,I myself was one who argued wi em, about the Boom @ Bust cycle, But no they took a few years holiday,putting sod all in the pension pot,whilst workers still contributed their share weekly.:eek: Many are not aware of this fact,or choose to ignore it,:rolleyes: THat is the reason firms cannot now afford Final Pensions,:mad: Funny the pay offs n the like fer those that took this mad decision aint been affected as i can see,:(
|
Re: Grangemouth
Quote:
|
Re: Grangemouth
Quote:
|
Re: Grangemouth
and the truth about grangemouth just as i suspected. The Grangemouth dispute makes it clear who really runs the country - Comment - Voices - The Independent the tories are connected to these;) the tories for britain i dont think so.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com