Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   BENEFITS hmmmm (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/benefits-hmmmm-65707.html)

Less 24-02-2014 17:51

BENEFITS hmmmm
 
Thanks to C'mon and yourself the site is suffering from copy & paste syndrome.
We've managed over 10 years with actual input from members, we won't make another 2 years if everyone posts in this manner, we can all google for ourselves, we don't need you to do it for us.
:(

Accyexplorer 24-02-2014 18:54

Re: BENEFITS hmmmm
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 1095594)
Thanks to C'mon and yourself the site is suffering from copy & paste syndrome.
We've managed over 10 years with actual input from members, we won't make another 2 years if everyone posts in this manner, we can all google for ourselves, we don't need you to do it for us.
:(

"The site" was a little quite less,I fully comprehend folk can google for themselves, I thought I'd add some links to contribute to the thread in a hope to provoke a less negative reply.
Suppose I better get back to my buildings :rolleyes:

Less 24-02-2014 19:04

BENEFITS hmmmm
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1095610)
"The site" was a little quite less,I fully comprehend folk can google for themselves, I thought I'd add some links to contribute to the thread in a hope to provoke a less negative reply.

Suppose I better get back to my buildings :rolleyes:


The site will get quieter still if you only post links, the idea is to express your opinion, not just copy and paste a link to someone else's.
You want a less negative reply? How could anyone give anything but negative replies to the links you put on.

Yes, do please get back to your buildings, that at least was your own work and not just taken from someone else.
:)

Accyexplorer 24-02-2014 19:25

Re: BENEFITS hmmmm
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 1095616)
The site will get quieter still if you only post links, the idea is to express your opinion, not just copy and paste a link to someone else's.
You want a less negative reply? How could anyone give anything but negative replies to the links you put on.

Yes, do please get back to your buildings, that at least was your own work and not just taken from someone else.
:)

Ok,I understand,I must say though,I do usually put my opinion on however late and of low quality it may be (in your opinion) :(

Enjoy yourself ;)

Retlaw 24-02-2014 19:29

Re: BENEFITS hmmmm
 
This site is a lot quieter because a lot who used to post on here have joined with Gary Martin's group on Face Book, one or two who used to be sarcastic bully's on here, started abusing members on Face Book, they were immediately banned. There are now over 500 members on Gary's group.

Margaret Pilkington 24-02-2014 21:07

Re: BENEFITS hmmmm
 
Well, that's ok if you are a fan of facebook.....I'm not. So I'm stopping here!

Neil 24-02-2014 22:34

Re: BENEFITS hmmmm
 
Facebook has it's pro's and con's like everything else. It's good because it's easy to reach a lot of people in a short time but it is very poor at being a forum. The bigger groups get the more it's failings show. I am a member of a group with 3500+ members. There are that many posts in one place you can't follow whats going on. Facebook has no good way of searching for posts on a group

Accyexplorer 25-02-2014 00:37

Re: BENEFITS hmmmm
 
The Queen and Prince Charles cash in on tens of thousands of pounds' worth of benefits every year - Mirror Online

Do they really need the money? No.
Is she a "Welfare Queen"? yes
Would tourists still visit the tower of London, and other British landmarks, even if the royal family wasn't tax supported? yes,I think so....hmmmm.:)
She should certainly get sanctioned :D
I still think its the Politicians though that are the biggest benefits scroungers with their lies and cheating,anything to line their own pockets.
Government declares war on Benefits Street's scroungers

Kettle and pot?

Neil 25-02-2014 01:07

Re: BENEFITS hmmmm
 
What a couple of stupid typical sensationalistic newspaper rubbish non stories. They rent out houses they own, is it their fault if the people who rent their houses have to claim benefits to pay the rent?
Should all businesses who rent out houses give them for free to people who claim housing benefit?

Who is that union general secretary who said why can't they give the houses to a housing association? Does he think housing associations don't charge rent?

I wonder how much money he earns? I just googled it but could only find his 2009 salary of £110,000 including pension contributions and car.

Margaret Pilkington 25-02-2014 07:00

Re: BENEFITS hmmmm
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 1095661)
Facebook has it's pro's and con's like everything else. It's good because it's easy to reach a lot of people in a short time but it is very poor at being a forum. The bigger groups get the more it's failings show. I am a member of a group with 3500+ members. There are that many posts in one place you can't follow whats going on. Facebook has no good way of searching for posts on a group

Yes Neil, it might be good for some things.....but I have yet to be convinced.
It doesn't fulfil any of my requirements.
Like I said........ I'm stopping here!

Margaret Pilkington 25-02-2014 07:11

Re: BENEFITS hmmmm
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1095665)
The Queen and Prince Charles cash in on tens of thousands of pounds' worth of benefits every year - Mirror Online

Do they really need the money? No.
Is she a "Welfare Queen"? yes
Would tourists still visit the tower of London, and other British landmarks, even if the royal family wasn't tax supported? yes,I think so....hmmmm.:)
She should certainly get sanctioned :D
I still think its the Politicians though that are the biggest benefits scroungers with their lies and cheating,anything to line their own pockets.
Government declares war on Benefits Street's scroungers

Kettle and pot?

I have to say that I am with Neil on this one.

You may not like the Royal family, but they are one of the main reasons why the tourists come and spend their money here....and I am sure that there have been surveys that support this.
Britain relies heavily on the hospitality and leisure industry for income. This is especially true of the places where the Royals reside.....Sandringham, Windsor,
Balmoral. If you visit any of these places you will find them thronged with tourists at any time of the year. These tourists are spending money......adding to the economy.
There are many other things where a penny pinching attitude would be more worthy.
These stories also smack of the politics of envy....besides being sensationalist nonsense.
Please do not fall into the trap that mires our member from over the border......posting snidely sensationalist headlines without any real balance.

Margaret Pilkington 25-02-2014 07:12

Re: BENEFITS hmmmm
 
Oh, and I will apologise for the long words :)

Less 25-02-2014 07:41

Re: BENEFITS hmmmm
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1095683)
Oh, and I will apologise for the long words :)

And how are you going to apologise for using such a long word as apologise?

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-yvgt-0kkZI...lseApology.jpg

Accyexplorer 25-02-2014 07:53

Re: BENEFITS hmmmm
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 1095666)
What a couple of stupid typical sensationalistic newspaper rubbish non stories. They rent out houses they own, is it their fault if the people who rent their houses have to claim benefits to pay the rent?
Should all businesses who rent out houses give them for free to people who claim housing benefit?

Who is that union general secretary who said why can't they give the houses to a housing association? Does he think housing associations don't charge rent?

I wonder how much money he earns? I just googled it but could only find his 2009 salary of £110,000 including pension contributions and car.

Maybe I could of put more effort into my comment but "stupid typical sensationalistic newspaper rubbish" is a bit harsh,rubbish would of done :D.
The point I'm trying to make is I don't think the royals are worth the millions we (the taxpayer) pump into their 'high flying' lifestyles. :)

Neil 25-02-2014 08:17

Re: BENEFITS hmmmm
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1095692)
Maybe I could of put more effort into my comment but "stupid typical sensationalistic newspaper rubbish" is a bit harsh,rubbish would of done :D.
The point I'm trying to make is I don't think the royals are worth the millions we (the taxpayer) pump into their 'high flying' lifestyles. :)

I was getting at the newspaper not you. You did fall for their rubbish though :p

Maybe they are not worth the millions we pump in but you need to know their net cost to the Country after including what money they bring in from tourism and other good they do before you can decide what they cost us.


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:06.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com