Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Could the reason that paparazzi are hiding in cars trying to take pictures of royal toddlers have something to do with the woeful lack of 'official' pictures that are issued?

My niece has been flooding Facebook virtually every day for the last six months with snaps of her sprog. Never once has it been suggested that the kid's childhood is being sacrificed.

Why not issue a few 'official' photos every few days? 99.9% of the papers will soon get bored and not bother to print them all, and the sad 'Hello' readers will get their regular dose of pictures to bill and coo over.

And it will make fuzzy pictures taken from half a mile away though a long range lens completely worthless.

Just a thought!

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

To me ,their just like breeding pandas at the Zoo,I don't see what the fuss is about....


..but I don't like the monarchy or babies ;)

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

I reckon the TV reality shows have bred the kind of sad gets that are interested in stuff like this, its a whole new Skanker.:D

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Nah. My wife predates reality shows, but she laps up all the gossip and photos of the royals.

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

I take it you're one of these folk that crave a weekly dose of these tedious pictures? For me I couldn't care less if it's a royal brat, some celebs latest "look at me, I'm so wonderful" African/Mongol/Asian adoption, or the Chavette down the streets latest addition to her brood of Chardonnays & Tylers. ;)

Ugly, slobbery, scrumpled up little boogers! :D People should be banned from flashing around kid pictures until their little darlings have reached an age somewhere around the teens mark & only then with a certificate attesting to their fledglings full training in, social niceties, impeccable manners & utmost respect for their elders & betters (regardless how crotchety, wrong or grumpy we appear).:s_aim1:

I may well be alone in these thoughts though ........ but I somehow doubt it. :rolleyes:

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Not at all. You missed my point.

There are PLENTY of people who DO crave them. So rather than moaning at people trying to get pictures of the kids, the easy thing to do is flood them with 'official' pictures. Do what every other parent with a Facebook Account is doing these days.

That way you keep control of the situation, and make paparazzi pictures worthless.

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Oh Cointreau mong cherry! (that's frog speak that is ;)) I merely applied a smidgeon of humour to the discussion, which, by the way seems to have bypassed your good self. Ah well, some folk I suppose must be serious so's the rest of us don't have to be. :)

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Why does Camilla wear big hats?

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Probably to take attention away from her face.:D

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

I get this image of a Bulldog licking pish from a thistle, for some obscure reason. :D

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Gotta admit it; that broad is double coyote ugly.;)

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Parents have a right to decide if they want pictures of their children published.
Recently at a school sports day parents were banned from taking pictures of events...yet these same parents put pictures of their children on social media.

Prince William and Kate do not want their children in the public eye.....They do not court publicity by using their children.....unlike so called celebs.....who court publicity most of the time.
This gives the media the feeling that it is ok to take any pictures they like....But the Royals do not do this. They want to keep their children's lives away from the public gaze. (A bit like those parents who didn't want their children to be in the sports day pictures)
Personally, I have very little interest in babies or children.....and certainly would not buy a magazine to get a look at these children.

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

My grandma used to say 'If you can't fight, wear a big hat".

Does that help??

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Easier to understand than when you speak scouse:D

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

'Ere! that's Scouscist that is! I want compo now, cos you've trampled me 'uhman rights! :D

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

A large hatpin can be a lethal weapon.

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

I am somewhat disturbed about the adverse comments about Camilla. In my opinion she is all woman and makes me envious of Charles. Never mind photos of Royal babies; let's have more of Cutie Cam.

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

So the honest truth is adverse?:confused:

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

:eek: Should've gone to specsavers ....... TWICE! That or deviants anonymous. ;)

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

I'm with you in the campaign for Cutie Cams curves M :D

Attachment 50357

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

cute..she aint.
She is as ugly as a hatful of bum holes........sorry, but that is just my opinion.
I would make another observation but it is lewd and crude and it is Sunday so I will let you imagine what it might be.

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

As I'm sure your aware M,beauty is but skin deep and I feel your judging a book by its cover :p

It's similar to buying a house,just because the exterior may be a little weathered, the interior may be lovely with lots of potential.
I've also had enough of the size zero BS that media spouts too,real women have curves ....I say,be proud of what you've got and shake them curves ladies :D

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Do you prefer cow, horse or pig compost?:alright: Sorry, forgot you were an expert on the subject of compost having been subjected to so much of it as a scouse supporter

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Bang out of order that mate! Typically Manky U below the belt strike that fella. :rolleyes:

Now back to slagging, wrinkly, withered owd baggages! :D

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Camilla may be butt ugly, but I did resent the late Princess of (who shall I bang next) Wales calling her a Rottweiler. Rotties, esp. my late best friend Hera, are beautiful. I can't find a pic of her .... gotta organize shiite on this computer.

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

'ang on ... this'll do:

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Yes, I am aware that beauty is skin deep.....and handsome is as handsome does. Her track record is not good....She was having a sexual liaison on the evening before Charles married Diana.....well, that is according to popular media......and the liaison continued throughout the marriage.

I stand by my first comment....she is as fow as a summons.
Beauty is skin deep but ugly goes right down to the bone.

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

....and, of course, no-one cares what's on the mantelpiece when they're poking the fire!

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Ah, but when you've finished it's nice to sit back & enjoy it though. :rolleyes:

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

Are we talking of the Reeperbahn or Charlottenburg?:rolleyes:

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

You forgot the Davids wacht & Fischmarkt Bazza! :D

And now for something completely different ! - Accrington Web

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

I didn't frequent the disreputable districts;)

Re: Photographs of Royal Babies
 

That musta been,cos yeh weren't aware of em back then.:D