Camilla - Charles
 

Just announced they are to marry quickly :eek: April 6th ish??

What do you think? I personally do not like it, because this is the women that helped make Princess Dianna's life miserable. And how will the boys look at there new Step Mum?? After she split up Mum and Dad????

Lot of legal issues to sort out as well?? QUEEN???

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

They'll probably make her Kings consort if anything.
I personally don't see what the fuss is about. Or what Princess Di has to do with anything. Shes been dead for long enough and besides she wasn't exactly an angel herself was she?
All the bleeding hearts will be on parade till then and I suppose we will be stuck with the channels showing "Di" footage in protest.:rolleyes:

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

yep I have to agree with you pixie, leave em too it I say.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I'm just not looking forward to all the Di fanatics that will be out and about till then. For goodness sake she was a deranged slapper, who was a bit posher than the rest of us allegedly, not a freakin saint.
I'm no big fan of Charles and Camilla either, just live and let live.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Well said Pixie!

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

well said pixie

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Well said pixie! Leave them to it everybody deserves happiness, nobody can help who they fall in love with. They say they are soul mates so good on them and congratulations hope it all works out fine and they spend many happy years together.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

WELL i must say i have to AGREE with you pixie, and i think its time they left him (charles) alone to have a bit of happiness, one would assume that the boys are quite well adjusted now to the fact that their dad has a woman. i wish them both all the best.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Yep, this is the best news of the year so far....I've just been out and ordered my XL size Royal Wedding 2005 T-Shirt (Geddit!!!). I'll also be saving up to get my Royal Doulton 36-piece China set, with lovely piccys of the bride and groom, a special keepsake that will be treasured down the years to come.


I wonder.....do you think the AccyWeb should have a street party with balloons and trifle and similar things? I do hope the date is'nt Wednesday 6th April, because its daft having a public holiday in the middle of the week, unless, of course, they're going to give us the entire week off in celebration, which I doubt will happen, so a friday or a monday will be best so we can all have a long weekend.

God bless the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I am surprised the Queen has given her blessing after all this time.
Maybe she is thinking of giving up the throne in a couple of years and wants to see Charles wed first.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

No Definately Not We Will As Tax Payers Be Paying Enough Towards The Wedding Ie. Policing, Bringing In And Bending Over Backwards For Visiting Heads Of State Why Dont They Just Do What Many Other People Do On The Second Time Round, B....r Off To The Register Office Without A Fuss And Spare Us All The Expence.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

He should have married her in the first place and saved a lot of anguish for Diana.
But God, the kids would have been ugly!!!!!! I hope they don't make a big fuss about it. And I don't think the queen will ever abdicate in favour of weak kneed Charles.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Whats the odds Diane,s family will be invited,?.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Camilla has been on the scene since way before Diana, who let's face it was probably an arranged marriage which everyone pretends doesn't happen but we all know it does. At least the kids inherited their mothers looks, I hope they didn't inherit her manipulative personality. I know Camilla isn't pretty but our Charlie is no Brad Pitt either is he......:D
I wish them well.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I wonder what on earth made them pick that date?
They've gone and upstaged us now! Ours isn't until May 14th.

I think people should stop having opinions and just let them get on with it.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Everybody will have forgotten theirs by then Willow. I'm sure that yours will be far nicer and not some media fiasco, which theirs is sure to be.:)

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I agree with Pixie on this subject, I used to be very much in favour of the monarchy but now I don't really care much either way.

Pixie, I loved your "deranged slapper" posting but the accyweb won't allow me to give you karma:( ....next time;)

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Allow me, Busman!!!

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I think the wedding date should be 31st August, just to **** off all the Di fan club.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I was not a huge fan of Diana, but I think Charles treated her abominably, just used her to provide him with two sons....I don't think he ever loved her....he even said as much when they got engaged. Well, what goes around comes around.
I couldn't give two hoots for either of them. In fact if I said what I really think they would probably have me locked up in the tower!

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

hows this for name dropping i used to be a real royalist, having met prince charles and his father and been to lunch with the princess royal. i was also professionally quite involved with the duke of westminster . but i must admit since diana and the qheens reaction i honestly think that this country could get along fine without them. recent events have ruined the whole concept of a royal family.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Prince Charles is morally bankrupt......I am saying no more!

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Willow, yours will be a much better event......no media circus......just family, friends and people that you love.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

i just feel for his lovelly sons oh yes i know they have done a few stupid things but who hasn't

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I don't mind either way about the monarchy. I always think we could be much worse off, even if they are only a figurehead.

Thank you both!:D


That would be tasteless. Funny, but tasteless.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Mines on May 13th...















..2006.:D

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I think you meant great minds almost think alike.:D

Theres absolutley no doubt about the great minds part.;)

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

For some one hes been sha#@ing for 30yrs she doesnt wear well.http://www.luxweb.co.uk/%7Eaccringt/...lies/smile.gif

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

ok ive got £5 says she dies in a tunnel within 5 years

i just wish i had put a fiver on dirty slut box die :)

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I am AMAZED at how callous some people can talk of the dead!!!!. Considering such ones have never known the person, just built an opinion out of the gutter press :(

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I'm sorry I didn't know you knew her on a personal level. :rolleyes:

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

im sorry but im absolutely disgusted with the name calling of Diana, "deranged slapper" oh come on so you telling me that if the girl down the road was married to a man for years and he wasnt the best husband so they broke up and she found a man who makes her happy that in turn she has made herself worthy of the name "deranged slapper" i dont think so.

At the end of the day maybe she wasnt the perfect angel but then come on who is?
I dont care what charles does its his life at the end of the day, and let him do what makes him happy if he wants to marry camilla that up to him hes the one who has to live with her!!

Talking ill of the dead should not be done, for one she cant answer back for herself and 2 would you like someone to call your mother a "Deranged Slapper".

Seems all of you knew her well to be able to pass judgement on her like that, well i didnt and i wont pass judgement on her or anyone else i dont know for that matter.

Well enough said on that topic and shame on you all.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

She needed a lot of men to make her happy then. I mean there was Hewitt, Will Carling, a couple of surgeons - all whilst she was a married woman. Maybe she was just really scared of the dark and couldn't sleep on her own.;)

As for deranged - lets see...anorexic, bulimic, manipulative, paranoid...the list is endless.

The lot of them could be on the front pages of Take A Break, never mind OK!

As for passing judgement - granted I never knew the woman on a personal level. Only through the media which she used to her full advantage.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

So you think everything you read in the papers is true then ?

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Where did I say that?

Diana gave numerous interviews, had millions of photos taken etc etc. Its hard NOT to build a certain image of someone when they are thrusting themselves onto your front pages every day.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

So what was you doing in the room while she had these men with her? if it declaired in ok mag that the world was to end tomorrow you would really beleive it would you?

Can you always trust what they say and if your no fan of dianas why even bother to read what they say so that you can pass judgement the way you have!!

If she wants lots of male company then that would be her business not yours.

As for the "Deranged" i think if a person has a few problems in their life people like you dont make it any easier for them i just hope you never have a problem in your life like that god forbid it would make you "deranged".

I hope nobody ever has the problems you describe because that would be trully awful and i certainly wouldnt call them deranged.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Like i said you read it you believed it but at the end of the day it dont give you the right to call people these hurtful names.

Would you like it if people started calling you these names?

No it probably wouldnt bother you because you would be a stong kinda person but to people who have the problems you have just outlined do you think it would do any good.

Its like being bullied in the play ground.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

diana was a ***** no doubts about it

the only thing thats different now is that she is a dead ****

yes she was the peoples princess

the peoples princess for a price , as long as you had money her knickers would drop when the price was right

if an every day woman acted the way she did she would soon pick up names like ******* , **** etc so why should she be any different

personaly i think the driver of her car only crashed because ******************

as you can tell i am no fan of the royal family or their hangers on :(

also i dont believe everything i read in the press but i sure believe what i see and hear like the phone recordings she made and letters she wrote

the press didnt record or write them and neither did the tv programs they only showed them to us

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Im sorry but for the language used i can tell your not very intelligent, so you dont warrent a reply!

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

So Chav 1
you have met her and talked to her have you ?
I HAVE as she came round the place i worked for
and i can tell you she is a very nice person

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

public image all for show i would be smiling and stuff if i got paid thousands just to show up and be nice shes hardly going to turn up and start acting daft infront of the press is she


you just did .. DUH

next time i dont warrant a reply simply dont bother

sorry guys and gals but everyone has somthing they cant abide and mine is the royal family , if you dont like bad things been said about the royal family try www.kissroyaltysbum.co.germany

edit:

hang on i didnt swear once and if i did it would have been censored:p

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I never said it WAS my business. I was stating MY opinion of her public persona that Diana chose to portray. It was very hard NOT to notice anything that Diana did whilst she was alive as she always made sure she had a face full of make up and a camera crew whenever the mood took her to do something nice.
Diana had only a few problems? Blimey, if she was still alive she would have been a medical marvel with all the new mental problems they could have named after her.
And chav thank you for your comments. Although you need to look at that potty mouth.:D

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

It must be my "low IQ".;)

I do apologise.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

ok chav1 where in my post did i mention swearing? i said bad language, i certainly wouldnt want one of our younger viewers reading your post! I would say inappropriate and uncalled for.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

ok pixie yes you certainly are entitled to your opinion and i wont take that away from you.

This thread aint going nowhere a matter of conflicting opinions i think.

I suppose it will be someone else thats going to get in another thread.

Just a little reminder of a few words i heard throughout life: If you dont have anything nice to say then dont say anything at all.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Life would be pretty mundane if we all stuck that.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Ya can't beat a good full and frank exchange of opinion!!!!!!!!!!

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

so be it. But sometimes those few little words should ring through your ears.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

If they ever do I'll let you know. Until then I don't need you to preach morals and ethics to me dear.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

As you would know !:)

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

But it was also extremely funny :rofl38:

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I'm glad I'm not the only one with a twisted sense of humour!:D

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

sorry but reading chavs post did NOT make me laugh, chuckle, chortle, titter, and i certainly didnt crack a rib!! Twisted well lets say you said it.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

although my language may have been close to the bone i can assure you there are 5 year olds in accrington who could teach us older folk a few new words

i wasnt looking to get into a slanging match and didnt think i was going to as i didnt launch a personal attack on anyone here where as i was called thick or words to that description

but..

if you are going to call someone out on their intelligence it would be wise to make sure you dont make spelling mistakes when doing so

although you spelt warrant wrong the rest of your spelling was fine lol

ps:

i know my spelling is awful but i dont call other people out on their intelligence

can we still be friends despite our difference of opinion on how to treat the dead :hippy:

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Just think....it could have been far worse. It could have been Charlie that died in the tunnel and Di would be marrying Dodi in April!

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I was not calling you thick in any way i was just refering to the fact that you could have put your point forward in a different way no need for the terms used.

I have a 5 year old daughter and i know she certainly wouldn't know any of the words for sure but she would be able to read them then come asking me what they meant.

Hey i never fell out with anyone, like its been said before we are all entitled to our opinion, the only thing that did really bother me was, how do i put it the way you compiled your post.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Charles can marry who he wants(and is doing) but he should not be allowed to be the King of this country, because as such he is the head of the Church of England. He should have to renounce his right to the throne.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Chav-1 I have 3 children that use this messageboard and I don't appreciate your THOUGHTLESS language.......................they are 7,8,13 yrs and none use or think in that language. And I dont want them learning it THANKS...

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Your post didn't make me smile either chav.
I'm proud of MUMMIBOO.
I couldn't have put what she said better my-self.
I'm sick and fed up of hearing about it.
if no one is getting hurt then what does it matter?
Diana isnt here and should be kept out of it.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I think that "Deranged Slapper" was quite amusing, a little shocking but amusing none the less and certainly no worse than anything seen in the press.

However, I do have to agree with Anne and Simon, that we should all be mindful of the fact that children have unrestricted access to the site and we should try, where ever possible, to moderate our language. If you cannot immediately think of an alternative to the word you wish to use there is always the option of using asterisks (*) in place of some of the letters.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Well said Margaret. IMHO most of you are missing the point.
It's not about Diana's virtues or lack of them. It's not even about Camillas "striking" looks.
Marriages do sometimes fail for lots of reasons and those who are to blame do sometimes get a second chance.
However Charles shouldn't expect to have his cake and eat it. If he really loves Camilla why can't he give up his right to the throne just like his great uncle (I think that's what he was)Edward did? It's not as if there is a shortage of others who could step up. This would go some way, at least, to repair the damage done to the Monarchy by the "suit yourself" attitudes of some of the family members.
As King, Charles would be head of the Church of England and if he was to take over after this he would damage both the Monarchy and the Church. Church and the Monarchy might not be considered very trendy in the popular view but they are both important to a lot of people.

Gosh I sound all grown up!!!

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Lets put things in perspective here, Is Charlie doing anything that another normal person does ?? OK not gone about it totally right n no im not a Royalist, but he's human like the rest of us least we all know now that royalty are not much better really. How many have divorced then re-married or living with someone in oo-err sin lol whatever circumstances a bet quite a few in same boat as Charlie eh? How many kids in this country are in step - parent families....lots? .... n nobody makes a huge fuss as long as they are happy n doing things for right reasons then what the heck!


So why is it diff for Charlie?? least at last he's gonna marry the woman he's been with secretly for sooo long ok she aint a patch on Diana for looks n heart. But least he is marrying her for right reasons well hope he learnt lol, even at the expense of his mummy dear. When Charlie n Diana married i think it was forced n they were no way ready also being young n naive they learnt the hard way like the rest of us do. Those young lads will never forget their mother n Diana did well in raising em to be humans than royal robots, she was a good mother n patron to this country n ppl wont forget that, so why prolong things further n let Charlie get on with it n all the best to him cos he'll need it lol n braver than me i dont think i could imagine to walk down the isle again...cept for me furneral lol:rolleyes:

Take away the big mansion, taxfree money etc n you'll find the Royal's absolutely no different to any family in the country at the mo.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

But, remember Charles is NOT a normal person. He is a member of the Royal Family and one day if he becomes King, he will be head of the Church of England.....a church who sees Camilla as still married......so in effect not able to marry into the church.....hence the civil ceremony, with only a church blessing ( which is not the same as marrying into the church). Princess Margaret fell in love with Peter Towsend(who was divorced) and although there was only a very slim chance that she would become queen, was told that if she married Peter Townsend then she would have to renounce her right to the throne. I have NO problem with Charles marrying Camilla, but everything comes at a price, and the price would be that he cannot be King.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Oh blaming eckers it doesn't matter to me whether he's king or not, but really having the ole fashion view of the church of England - whom no doubt have married a few divorcee's themselves, but really is his marital decisions anyones bizz will it truelly effect the way the country is run n the way normal ppl are as long as he does his royal patronship to this country properly! N to get polictal mmmm wonder how the church of england started wasnt it so Henry the 8th could have many marriages cos many of his ex wives lost their head literally, now that isnt a nice example of the head of state is it, so what Charlie is doing is rather tame n the difference bet him n his uncle is that in those days...u stayed together, married an all cos it was the done thing doesnt apply to this day n age unfortunately...ahh i found that so romantic that Edward gave up his throne to marry his lady....gosh would u find men today giving up all football for his woman - not a cat in hell chance ... but nice while dream lasted all of 5 secs ... unless lol

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Yeah, you are right about Henry the 8th.....so he's the one to blame for all this.
And while it might be an old fashioned view of the Church..... it was the Church who made these rules. Everyone has to live by rules, and the message that Charles is giving is.....well, it is Ok to do anything you want. What Charles should have done was marry Camilla 30 years ago, but he did not have the b***s to stand up to his mother.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Edward the 8th(or he would have been) renounced the throne so that he could marry Wallis Simpson who herself was divorced......he could not marry a divorcee and become King.......and he was forced into exile......Not many men would give up their country and their crown for the woman they loved.....but he loved her enough to do that and he should be applauded because he did the right thing.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Pmsl Margaret dont want to think of charlies b***s yuky LOL but you're right about him being whimsical. Trouble is that does the Cof E stand with all the multi religious in the country, doesnt quite have the desired effect as these days one rule cancels out another, but TBH i dont think anyone really cares that much atm probably all sick of this camilla thing been happening for centuries [feels like it lol] n i dont think our Queen is ready to give up on the throne yet n chances could be that Wils gets it... who knows:rolleyes:

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I think you are sooooooooo spot on there...... think the Queen knows what a milksop Charles is and intends to hang on in there til the last gasp. And you know what, the thought of Charlies b***s has fair put me off bull's eyes.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Lmao Margaret it has for me too lol

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Aye Margaret that man is a gentleman n a half what a huge gesture of love n commitment is that ..... an applause he gets off me ...respect!

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Why does the suggestion of the Queen giving up the throne come into it? Charles should only inherit the throne when his mother dies. That is the normal way. There has been talk on and off for years of her abdicating in favour of her son or grandson but why?

It would be normal procedure for Charles to become king on his mother's death.

Why should the monarch be the head of the Church of England? As we've already said this C of E stance on divorce is rather hypocritical considering the reason the church was created was in order to grant Henry VIII a divorce and the freedom to remarry.

I just think it's rather amusing now that they can't marry at Windsor but have to go to the local Register Office.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

And now it looks like that may not be legal either.

I don't know why the Monarch is head of the Church of England Willow, that is just the way it is......and even though Diana is deceased Charles is still a divorcee and so is his intended......apparently the High Church of England requires the Monarch at the crowning to take Holy Communion and divorcees are banned from taking Holy Communion........again, don't ask me why, that's the way it is.

Personally I don't care what they do, as long as they don't expect me to chip in for the celebrations.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

This will be an interesting point when it comes to Charles' accession to the throne. He and Diana were divorced but in the eyes of the Church that would not be recognised so that technically would they be regarded as still married? If that were the case then the fact that Diana is no longer alive could technically make Charles a widower, so would that then mean he'd be able to take Holy Communion following his coronation?

One for the boffins to ponder over.

It's so ludicrous because in the past the rules have been changed to suit the monarch of the time but now it seems that the monarchy has to change to suit the rules. What a crazy country we live in.

Maybe they'll end up getting married in Scotland after all and then if Scotland gets independance from England they could get crowned King & Queen of Scotland, then when Queen Elizabeth II dies Charles can inherit her throne and Bob's your Uncle.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Apparently is doesn't work like that......again, I do not know the reason why..... it is buried in Royal protocol........but Scotland is the only place that they could have a civil ceremony....and if you remember that is where the Princess Royal married her husband......that was again because it was not legal for them to have a civil ceremony in England.

Personally, I don't want Charles to become King......if he was too weak kneed to stand up to his mother 30 odd years ago, he is too weak to become King.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Of course you are right, which in effect says that the Monarchy is out dated and is only there to draw the tourists........ but again personally, I would prefer it if he looked strong.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

And the latest news is that they are both in therapy because of the stress of the wedding preparations. Aw - bless!

I find it hilarious that the Sunday Express quotes a palace source regarding Princess Michael's "tacky" book-signing deal at Windsor Guildhall. If this farcical wedding isn't "tacky", then what is?

So we have the head of the C of E , successor (though very indirectly) to Henry VIII who set the institution up so that he could grant himself the divorce he required, unable to marry within the C of E because it has changed its policy since Tudor times. He can't marry in Windsor Castle because, if he does, so can everyone else for at least the next 3 years. He wishes, if and when he succedes his mother, to be not Defender of the Faith but Defender of Faiths because he doesn't want to offend anyone (and he knows on which side his bread is buttered) and he's marrying the woman he has "kept" for the last 30 years because he couldn't be bothered to marry her when it was all legal and, lucky for him, he was able to have his cake and eat it too, where Mrs P-B was concerned, when it was necessary for him to produce the "heir and a spare".

Talk about the Duke of Windsor and Wallis Simpson? A prim and proper affair compared to this sordid little lot.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

A weak kneed, lily livered custard. I may now be headed for the tower.......or I may now be beheaded in the tower. It is turning into a real dogs breakfast.
According to the Daily Mail.....if you believe all you read...... the Queen does not wish to see CP-B until the wedding......and the party has to be over by 6pm.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

If the late, lamented Princess Margaret (20 fags and a bottle of gin for breakfast) were still with us, the party would last until 6 p.m. - the next day. Of course, the guests would have to curtsey and call her "Ma'am darling" before they slid under the table. :p

(Margaret, is there room in the Tower for both of us?)

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I suppose we could share a cell.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

I find all this wedding stuff really tedious......if Charlie had done the right thing some 30 odd years ago we could all be spared the indelicacy of the whole charade.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Keep a space for me in the Tower, as well! The whole thing is an absolute farce.

Is it true that Earl Spencer is marketing a "Royal Wedding Souvenir Dartboard" with Charles and Camilla tastefully represented?

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

It maybe that the Spencer family turn up and object to the whole thing.......now wouldn't that be an embarrassment for C&C.
At this rate I think we are probably going to have a better party in the tower than they will have out of it..........and if you look on the upside we won't have to put up with any televisual images (yes,I know it isn't going to be televised, but it is being held in a public place so what is to stop Joe Public from going along with his video camera??????)

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Do you think the Special Branch will be sent out to buy up all the bad eggs and the soft tomatoes on the morning of the wedding.......I wouldn't throw soft ones...... mine would be in tins! I know......I know I am a self confessed cynical old baggage!

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

[QUOTE=Margaret Pilkington]I find all this wedding stuff really tedious......

My word Margaret, for someone who finds the subject tedious you are doing a fair amount of posting.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Well, you have to if you find you'd like to make a return comment! And that's what Accyweb is for.

Re: Camilla - Charles
 

Will all school children get commerative Royal wedding coins like last time? lf any one hears of bunting going up, or shops trimmmed up, call the republican hotline quick!