Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Music, Bands, Noise! (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f92/)
-   -   Beatles Or The Stones (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f92/beatles-or-the-stones-26872.html)

maxwell silver 17-12-2006 14:32

Beatles Or The Stones
 
Okay then,in your opinion who was the better of these two biggest bands of all time?For me The Stones had the edge in the rock stakes but The Beatles were the more innovative.Have The Stones outlived their stay?Did The Beatles split too soon?Where Lennon/McCartney better songwriters than Jagger/Richards?.What do you think?

flashy 17-12-2006 14:50

Re: Beatles Or The Stones
 
the beatles :D can't stand the rolling stones

lancsdave 17-12-2006 15:52

Re: Beatles Or The Stones
 
Based on longevity it has to be the Stones. Saw them in Berlin during the summer and it was an experience I will never forget.

chav1 17-12-2006 15:55

Re: Beatles Or The Stones
 
got to be the stones , not that i like them much but the beatles to me were set of tree hugging touchy feely bitches and where did it get them , DEAD mostly

rolling stones , rock and roll , fast lives, faster women ,plenty of booze and still rocking :D

cmonstanley 17-12-2006 16:16

Re: Beatles Or The Stones
 
:) :) gotta be the stones the beatles only had about 6 good albums and couldnt sustain it the stones have at lea:hititbana st 20 good albums:)

lancsdave 17-12-2006 16:18

Re: Beatles Or The Stones
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chav1 (Post 353375)
got to be the stones , not that i like them much but the beatles to me were set of tree hugging touchy feely bitches and where did it get them , DEAD mostly

rolling stones , rock and roll , fast lives, faster women ,plenty of booze and still rocking :D

They must have been better at tree hugging than Keith Richards. He tends to fall out of them :D

shakermaker 17-12-2006 17:13

Re: Beatles Or The Stones
 
The Beatles any day. The early stuff is a bit too 'I love you, you love me, doobidoobidoo' and the later stuff is one big trip but, for me, the best songs ever written were by them around 65/66 like Ticket To Ride, Yesterday and Eleanor Rigby.

The Stones had some great rock n roll songs but the longevity wrecked it for me as with The Who. They should've broke up decades ago. The new stuff is embarassing, they're just a business.

accymel 17-12-2006 17:27

Re: Beatles Or The Stones
 
Has to be the stones without a doubt i probably own most of their back catalogue:D

WillowTheWhisp 17-12-2006 17:50

Re: Beatles Or The Stones
 
Technically probably the Stones but personally I prefer some Beatles.

cashman 17-12-2006 23:53

Re: Beatles Or The Stones
 
love them both but the STONES win by a mile, jagger/richards a great songwriting team, lennon/mcartney good also but would argue lennon the much stronger of the two,on the basis that after the split mcartney wrote some real dirge wheras lennon some classics. saw the stones at the hyde park free concert also 20 years later so no they hadnt outlived their stay then certainly,only saw the beatles once they were ok, so on live performance the stones won again in my book.:)


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:44.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com