![]() |
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
Quote:
:D |
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
from my point of view, the re-arranged game is an opportunity to give back to the fans. The club have paid todays costs via receiving full pay on the gate. The replay should be an opportunity to get some valuable Google Page Ranking, and score big brownie points via the press by offering a cost covering price. By no means do I mean this should be the price or this is the cost of hosting a match but charging a fiver a head and getting 3000 in would go a lot further than charging a tenner and getting 1000. Use the opportunity wisely please ASFC, these type of opportunities do not come around often. I believe that season ticket holders will pay no extra for the game whatsoever, if this is the case then why should anybody else?
|
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
:D same here. i dont know how they can justifie their wages because there isnt that big a bridge in class through the leagues apart from ronaldo and the odd few players. all down to murdoch the dictator a few years ago everybody said they wouldnt watch pay per view now they have been brainwashed into it its time to give the game back to the people and stanley are the club to do it...
|
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
Exactly Macca, and the most annoying thing about it is the pitch didn't get any worse at half time, thats my gripe about it, if it was fit to play at 3pm it was fit to carry on playing on, i'm not saying it was, personally I think the game should never have started, I think the club realise this and thats why they are doing something about it
|
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
In all fairness, Rochdale had a infamous abandonment at h/t vs Grimsby. Vouchers were issued while leaving ground entitling people to receive half price admission to the re-arranged game.
Those who could not make the re-arranged game could then send in their voucher prior to the new date and get a refund. On the night, no voucher and you pay full whack |
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
|
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
Quote:
It was wetter on the Clayton end......:D Can't beat a nice action shot. :) |
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
Quote:
It might be an idea to raise to pitch a little and put some back drains in so the water runs off to the Car Park not the centre of the park. I know today was a rare one off, but if our winters are going to get wetter we'll need to do something.... |
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
Quote:
OI!!! u cheeky ****ing get!!! No i dont want the flu spoiling my new year, plus after the thought of possibly being abandoned due to the weather - what is the point - have i missed owt other than getting ****ed wet through:confused: hopefully the re-scheduled one will have better weather:rolleyes: so what bit does that make me a lazy get???? I go to more matches than some people out there as much as i can afford & i stand in the clayton end under the sky - plus 2 matches a week is hard on the finances - i love the club but gee i got to ****ing live Y'know - & thats what some of u lot forget that some people cant afford to support the club as No 1 in your life - & thats just not that at all feesable for some! There Dougies in the doghouse now:p |
Re: Stanley v Mansfield
Quote:
**** me! :eek: |
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:14. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com