![]() |
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
Could it be something to do with Stuart Fleetwood's loan - did anyone check his passport before he came over the border from Wales? Don't mean to sound flip, I'm as worried and angry as anyone but as we're not gonna get to know anything till early April all this guesswork won't get us anywhere. It's the lads I feel sorry for, they're gonna be out there battling for every point they can get and could still have some taken off them for something that ain't their fault which is putting even more pressure on them. All we can do is get behind the lads on the pitch - and pray!
|
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
How many games did Shaun Whalley play in Dec before he 'signed' in Jan
|
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
You're right Jeff, we did have to wait for clearance on Gary. I remember how funny it sounded at the time - if it turns out to be that it won't be so funny!
|
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
Says in todays Telegraph
"charged with fielding 2 ineligible players in 3 recent games" McGrail played in 2 for us so that means the other player only played 1 game ( or 3 if he played in same ones as McGrail) My guess is going on - David Martin, any more? |
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
Incidentally Joe played in the 2-0 defeat at Grimsby, the 2-0 defeat at Doncaster, the 3-3 draw with Shrewsbury, the 4-3 defeat by MK Dons, the 3-3 draw at Macclesfield, the 4-0 defeat at Bristol Rovers and the 1-1 draw with Bury. We picked up three points in the games that he played for us. Chris McGrail played in the 3-2 win against Mansfield and the 1-1 draw at Wycombe that's four points gained. If it is Joe Jacobson and Chris McGrail then we could be looking at losing seven points
|
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
I think we can rule Jacobson out can't we?, says on fishy site 3 games - he played in 7
|
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
Hi folks,
just registered to commiserate. As a Don's fan, I know what it's like to go through this situation. I hope you get treated more fairly than we did. Good luck for the rest of the season. |
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
If it's David Martin, surely they can't count that - the lad never even touched the ball before he was injured so we didn't gain any advantage from him taking to the field. I wish the club would tell us who the other player is so we would know what we might be up against, all this is so frustrating!
|
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
If it is David Martin then we could be looking at five points.
|
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
Ashley Foyle, how many did he play for us, was it 1 or 2?
|
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley Under Investigation
What's with all the panic and acaremongering? !0points! 15points! 18points! etc. etc.
It clearly states on the fishy site that the charges relate to just 3 games. We know that two of those involve McGrail and could possibly cost us 4 points. THe third could, at worst, cost us an extra 3, and, at best, none. We all know that the fishy site is renowned for keeping us all informed with the true facts, so I reckon that makes it maximum 7 and could be less. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:21. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com