Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Not Happy (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/not-happy-29309.html)

Bagpuss 16-03-2007 19:36

Not Happy
 
To whoever, you know who you are, the missing thread, pathetic, don't abuse your position and slag me off then delete the thread.:mad:

harwood red 16-03-2007 19:42

Re: Not Happy
 
you've lost me bagpuss, which thread were you talking about or was it just a post in a thread thats been deleted??

accymel 16-03-2007 19:43

Re: Not Happy
 
The wimbledon newbie thread suddenly disappeared:confused:

Bagpuss 16-03-2007 19:46

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by harwood red (Post 398504)
you've lost me bagpuss, which thread were you talking about or was it just a post in a thread thats been deleted??

That's it, the person knows who they are so that's it I don't want a ban but I will not be silenced don't you agree mthead have we be done?:mad:

harwood red 16-03-2007 19:56

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss (Post 398507)
That's it, the person knows who they are so that's it I don't want a ban but I will not be silenced don't you agree mthead have we be done?:mad:

Hey its more likely to be me banned now I've posted above!! oh well it's enough to make yer hair curly, lol :D

Mancie 16-03-2007 19:59

Re: Not Happy
 
Looks like the thread got booted in an attempt to save someone from embarrasing themselves even more :)

K.S.H 16-03-2007 20:00

Re: Not Happy
 
Ask Zombie why, hes the moderator for this section and he's online now

harwood red 16-03-2007 20:01

Re: Not Happy
 
Oooo bye bye me then, nice knowing you all :o

accymel 16-03-2007 20:03

Re: Not Happy
 
Im sure we'll do a save Harwood Red protest post for u:D

harwood red 16-03-2007 20:04

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel (Post 398518)
Im sure we'll do a save Harwood Red protest post for u:D

awww thanks mel :D

Doug 16-03-2007 20:12

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by harwood red (Post 398517)
Oooo bye bye me then, nice knowing you all :o


Bye honey..........:D

Doug 16-03-2007 20:13

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel (Post 398509)
Yep thats the one:D my how things just pop out:eek: :D


You just keep them in love, it'll be cold pitch side tomorrow......:D :D :D

harwood red 16-03-2007 20:13

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 398525)
Bye honey..........:D

till tomorrow doug till tomorrow :D

Doug 16-03-2007 20:14

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by harwood red (Post 398527)
till tomorrow doug till tomorrow :D


I think we should party tomorrow.....:D See you soon :)

Bagpuss 16-03-2007 20:15

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mancie (Post 398514)
Looks like the thread got booted in an attempt to save someone from embarrasing themselves even more :)

For once I'm in agreement with you.

harwood red 16-03-2007 20:16

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 398529)
I think we should party tomorrow.....:D See you soon :)

I will be partying, making a full day and night of it :D NO KIDS :Banane48:

anyway we better stop thread wandering now or major hand slap :eek:

Bagpuss 16-03-2007 20:20

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by harwood red (Post 398532)
anyway we better stop thread wandering now or major hand slap :eek:

It's my thread and I say wander where you like.:)

harwood red 16-03-2007 20:21

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss (Post 398534)
It's my thread and I say wander where you like.:)

well thankyou mr bagpuss but I think the mods may have a say in that.. :rolleyes:

"Harwood red wanders all over thread and then wanders off muttering under her breath"

slinky 16-03-2007 20:22

Re: Not Happy
 
I haven't got a clue what is going on...................







BUT........






please can I stay and watch the fight?? :D:D


Nowt better than a good slanging match :D

mthead 16-03-2007 20:24

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss (Post 398507)
That's it, the person knows who they are so that's it I don't want a ban but I will not be silenced don't you agree mthead have we be done?:mad:

Yeah I noticed earlier Bagpuss but I've only just got back on.I contacted a Mod. about it and he's having a look.You got slagged off unfairly and I deleted the said persons karma even though he is a Mod. so what it was very unfair and out of context and hope some other Mod. will read this thread and deal with the peron as I think it is out of order and he should not have been able to say what he said.:mad:

slinky 16-03-2007 20:28

Re: Not Happy
 
Not that I am a stalker or anything .......... ;) :D:D:D roflmao... sorry if that made no sense ( It did to me)

mthead 16-03-2007 20:35

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mancie (Post 398514)
Looks like the thread got booted in an attempt to save someone from embarrasing themselves even more :)

Yeah in truth that probably was the reason it got booted and the slagging Bagpuss got:mad:

Bagpuss 16-03-2007 20:40

Re: Not Happy
 
I know something it's the last time I refer to Accrington Stanley as FC Stanley Of Accrington or I will be shot.

accymel 16-03-2007 20:42

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss (Post 398544)
I know something it's the last time I refer to Accrington Stanley as FC Stanley Of Accrington or I will be shot.

But wasn't there a flag somewhere with FC of Accrington on:confused:

mthead 16-03-2007 20:44

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss (Post 398544)
I know something it's the last time I refer to Accrington Stanley as FC Stanley Of Accrington or I will be shot.

Why I can't see the problem,I watched the Notts. Forest game on T.V. and what banner do you think I saw in the crowd? F.C. Stanley of Accrington.I remember it cus it made me chuckle being an F.C.United fan:D
I bet the banner appeared few more time to.

mthead 16-03-2007 20:48

Re: Not Happy
 
Try getting a photo of the banner and putting it in your signature,there must be one somewhere on the web Bagpuss mate.:D

Bagpuss 16-03-2007 20:48

Re: Not Happy
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel (Post 398546)
But wasn't there a flag somewhere with FC of Accrington on:confused:

Yep here it is.:)

accymel 16-03-2007 20:50

Re: Not Happy
 
I knew it :D:D:D well Bagpuss i think u should re-instate your signature back with pride :D

Mancie 16-03-2007 20:50

Re: Not Happy
 
Never noticed it before in the Bagpuss sig..takes a prat to notice it was FC Stanley and start having a pop at someone..and if it was my sig I wouldn't have changed it.

mthead 16-03-2007 20:50

Re: Not Happy
 
Post deleted

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/s...420#post374420

Bagpuss 16-03-2007 20:55

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel (Post 398556)
I knew it :D:D:D well Bagpuss i think u should re-instate your signature back with pride :D

Done with pride.:rolleyes:

accymel 16-03-2007 20:56

Re: Not Happy
 
Thats better Bagpuss:D dont least a mindless plonk tell u different :D

mthead 16-03-2007 20:58

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss (Post 398559)
Done with pride.:rolleyes:

NICE ONE:D only thing left now is the answer to the question a number of us are asking " WHERE'S THE THREAD GONE !!!!!!":D

Bagpuss 16-03-2007 20:59

Re: Not Happy
 
Met him once and he seemed like a nice chappie, I really don't have a problem with him but if he was Russell (Do you know who I am) Whalley that would be different.:mad:

loweiy 16-03-2007 20:59

Re: Not Happy
 
and what was it all about!!!

accymel 16-03-2007 21:07

Re: Not Happy
 
MMmmm thread deleted due to bad language :confused: erm no bad language as far as i could see on that thread tho:confused:

mthead 16-03-2007 21:12

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel (Post 398568)
MMmmm thread deleted due to bad language :confused: erm no bad language as far as i could see on that thread tho:confused:

Where did you get that from Mel?I Know There Was No Bad Language In That Thread!!!!and if so is the usual procedure not to stick it in over 18's???:)

accymel 16-03-2007 21:14

Re: Not Happy
 
Look at Post no 32 MT on this thread :confused:

ZOMBIE 16-03-2007 21:14

Re: Not Happy
 
I think we all need to calm down and remember that this is just a forum.

I deleted mthead's post above due to the content of bad language, as outlined in the thread I have included.

Apparently, a senior moderator deleted the Wimbledon thread before it became silly and a general slanging match. That's it. No conspiracy. Nobody being banned. No bad feelings.

Let's face it. By tomorrow afternoon we'll all be concentrating on more important matters than this. :)

slinky 16-03-2007 21:17

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ZOMBIE (Post 398576)
No conspiracy. bobody being banned.

:)

BoBody.......now there is a name that I haven't seen. I'm glad you named him!! BUT who is he?? :D:D

ZOMBIE 16-03-2007 21:22

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by slinky (Post 398577)
BoBody.......now there is a name that I haven't seen. I'm glad you named him!! BUT who is he?? :D:D

http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/6599/suspect4xl.gif

mthead 16-03-2007 21:24

Re: Not Happy
 
Fair do's,but the Wimbledon thread slanging match all started when a certain person slagged Bagpuss for something in his signature,which was totally out of the blue and no provocation,and the person is in a position of someone who should know better.Thats the bit what we are questioning as well as the deleting of the thread.Has the person in question got told he was wrong to do this in a position that he holds??:confused:

slinky 16-03-2007 21:25

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ZOMBIE (Post 398582)

Nice smiley ( frowny) weather changes you'll stick like that. ;)

Len 17-03-2007 04:04

Re: Not Happy
 
Well this is sad, just goes to show how people can get things so wrong.
It was I who removed the Wimbledon thread from the Stanley forums. The reason for doing so was because one of our well needed moderators had inadvertently compromised their identity and as some volunteer mods wish to remain anonymous then this really needed to be corrected, I’m sure most of you would understand without me having to explain, imagine if you were the volunteer you'll find it's often not a thankful job.

The thread in question was probably posted with good intention but from the word go members moaned about it being in the wrong forums and suggested that they were probably only spamming and therefore shouldn’t really be here, also members had a quiet unnecessary dig at the moderators and as a result prompted a reaction.
In total the thread had become trashed and with the privacy concern it was better/ simpler to just remove the thread rather than edit/ remove individual posts which would have generated complaints similar to what we have here.

I’ve said this before, if anyone has any complaint about moderator’s actions or what ever then contact admin, better doing that than creating new threads like this pointing the finger at the wrong mod and getting it wrong as we seam to have here.

Have a great day.

:)

Mancie 17-03-2007 04:16

Re: Not Happy
 
Well glad you made things clear Len.. and at the end of the day bagpuss is a scouser.. so no harm done! :)

Bagpuss 17-03-2007 07:22

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mancie (Post 398642)
Well glad you made things clear Len.. and at the end of the day bagpuss is a scouser.. so no harm done! :)

With a Stanley season ticket, come on Bolton.;)

Bagpuss 17-03-2007 07:27

Re: Not Happy
 
Bottom line Len he had a pop at me from behind a moderators mask which then fell off as he attempted to do the same towards mthead.

Correct the original thread needed removing but IMHO the new thread was needed to answer some questions.

mthead 17-03-2007 09:45

Re: Not Happy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Len (Post 398641)
also members had a quiet unnecessary dig at the moderators and as a result prompted a reaction

:)

Sorry Len thats wrong,I know you can re-read the thread from the point the mod in question joins the thread, it is him who without provocation laid into Bagpuss.
To be honest the senior mods should make this so called mod appologise to Bagpuss even if it has to be in a PM.He wasnt involved in the thread,there was no arguements going on in the thread UNTIL he decided to slag Bagpuss off.POWER GONE TO HIS HEAD springs to mind:mad:

ZOMBIE 17-03-2007 10:04

Re: Not Happy
 
I think this thread has now run its course and there's nothing to gain from keeping it going.

Len has politely explained his actions and I posted earlier to explain a few things too. Let's leave it now and concentrate on what really matters.


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:08.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com