Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   2057 (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/2057-35899.html)

mab 03-01-2008 22:26

2057
 
:rolleyes: were could we have put the short fall on gate capasity! on new years day? :dummy2:

harwood red 03-01-2008 22:30

Re: 2057
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mab (Post 512214)
:rolleyes: were could we have put the short fall on gate capasity! on new years day? :dummy2:


you've lost me :confused:

harwood red 03-01-2008 22:32

Re: 2057
 
right got ya now but don't think our capacity is quite 5000 yet

mab 03-01-2008 22:37

Re: 2057
 
meaning 2898 watched on n/y/day. 2157 down on ground capacity seemed to be more in than announced

Oggy 03-01-2008 22:37

Re: 2057
 
Shouldn't it be 2,159? :p

mab 03-01-2008 22:39

Re: 2057
 
HR you where in the clayton end did the main stand look full

Oggy 03-01-2008 22:40

Re: 2057
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mab (Post 512222)
meaning 2898 watched on n/y/day. 2157 down on ground capacity seemed to be more in than announced

Right you're getting nearer, not Bagpuss in disguise by any chance? :rolleyes:

mab 03-01-2008 22:42

Re: 2057
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oggy (Post 512223)
Shouldn't it be 2,159? :p

;) forgot about the 2 extrers:D:D

harwood red 03-01-2008 22:43

Re: 2057
 
right checked and yes you are right the ground capacity is 5057 so yes we were 2059 short of capacity. However I think the capacity has been reduced at some point. I don't think the clayton end was anywhere near full and there were still seats left in the stand also but no I don't think we could have got another 2000 in

lancsdave 03-01-2008 22:45

Re: 2057
 
This is just another attempt to discredit me winning guess the gate :D

mab 03-01-2008 22:51

Re: 2057
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by harwood red (Post 512227)
right checked and yes you are right the ground capacity is 5057 so yes we were 2059 short of capacity. However I think the capacity has been reduced at some point. I don't think the clayton end was anywhere near full and there were still seats left in the stand also but no I don't think we could have got another 2000 in

:) we sit in the main stand next to the away dugout,you'd only got beter than a 1000 extra on at the clayton end from were i was looking:)

mab 03-01-2008 22:54

Re: 2057
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 512228)
This is just another attempt to discredit me winning guess the gate :D

:) no not at all pal!

Oggy 03-01-2008 22:57

Re: 2057
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 512228)
This is just another attempt to discredit me winning guess the gate :D

Seems to be, but I counted the spaces myself, and got 2159.
Which, when I cross checked with the gate and capacity, is spot on. :rolleyes:

harwood red 03-01-2008 23:00

Re: 2057
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oggy (Post 512236)
Seems to be, but I counted the spaces myself, and got 2159.
Which, when I cross checked with the gate and capacity, is spot on. :rolleyes:

Hmm is that why you looked like a nodding dog at the match?? :D:rolleyes:

Oggy 03-01-2008 23:02

Re: 2057
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by harwood red (Post 512237)
Hmm is that why you looked like a nodding dog at the match?? :D:rolleyes:

That, and both teams launching high balls. ;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:39.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com