Accrington Web
Page 2 of 4 1 2 34
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   stephen lowe (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/stephen-lowe-37840.html)

depechemode 18-03-2008 17:00
Re: stephen lowe
 
will do lol

maccawozzagod 18-03-2008 17:00
Re: stephen lowe
 
you are a no mark nobody with nowt to offer the club other than your thirteen quid a week. Should they ban you then I'll pay the thirteen quid they will lose.

Next you'll be saying that Jack Barrett should concentrate on retirement and give over bleating about the old times, or John-de-Maine should go back to window cleaning or Eric Whalley should never have left Clitheroe or the groundsman should stick to Wilsons ... need I go on?


Ban the numpty please.

depechemode 18-03-2008 17:02
Re: stephen lowe
 
i wish i was a fisherman

maccawozzagod 18-03-2008 17:04
Re: stephen lowe
 
or a troll?

depechemode 18-03-2008 17:05
Re: stephen lowe
 
ok i just think he should give more REAL views not just nevermind we will win next game

depechemode 18-03-2008 17:06
Re: stephen lowe
 
ok , iam wrong so sorry to mr lowe

maccawozzagod 18-03-2008 17:06
Re: stephen lowe
 
it's about trying to portray a positive outlook at all times


what good would it do to write an article in the paper saying that everything is turd?


would that get the much needed punters through the door?

depechemode 18-03-2008 17:08
Re: stephen lowe
 
MUST ADMIT i agree with you but did you read cummins bit on burnley ?

mab 18-03-2008 19:08
Re: stephen lowe
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by depechemode (Post 547847)
MUST ADMIT i agree with you but did you read cummins bit on burnley ?
I'VE READ THE CUMMINS BIT AND HAVE TO SAY MEANS NOTHING TO ME NOT BEING A BURNLEY FAN, IF I WAS THEN MAY BE I WOULD BE INTERESTED,LOWE'S BIT ON STANLEY IS CORRECT AT NO POINT IS HE SLAGING STANLEY OFF ON OR OFF THE FIELD POSSITIVE READING,:)

lancsdave 18-03-2008 19:11
Re: stephen lowe
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by depechemode (Post 547847)
MUST ADMIT i agree with you but did you read cummins bit on burnley ?

There are probably more deragatory remarks made on here than anyone could write in the Blackburn Telegraph :D

mab 18-03-2008 19:18
Re: stephen lowe
 
If my post is in the Stanley section please note I am not one of us but one of them :D<!-- google_ad_section_end --> WHAT YOU THINK OF YOUR MANS COMMENTS OF YOUR TEAM ??:D<!-- / sig -->
<!-- controls -->

lancsdave 18-03-2008 19:34
Re: stephen lowe
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mab (Post 547969)
If my post is in the Stanley section please note I am not one of us but one of them :D<!-- google_ad_section_end --> WHAT YOU THINK OF YOUR MANS COMMENTS OF YOUR TEAM ??:D<!-- / sig -->

<!-- controls -->

I haven't seen the comments, can't find it online. 41 years since I went to my first Burnley game, do you think it will be anything I haven't read before :D

mab 18-03-2008 19:40
Re: stephen lowe
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 547984)
I haven't seen the comments, can't find it online. 41 years since I went to my first Burnley game, do you think it will be anything I haven't read before :D
:) NO NOT REALLY PAL THOUGHT YOU HAD READ THE ARTICAL.

OLDHAMADE 18-03-2008 20:17
Re: stephen lowe
 
If it's the same Stephen Lowe that's on Radio Lancashire then i'll forgive him even though he follows Stanley:tongueout

Top man! and like Steve Royal a great listen

lindsay ormerod 18-03-2008 20:26
Re: stephen lowe
 
Yep it's the same one ! :D


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:19.
Page 2 of 4 1 2 34
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com