Accrington Web
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Stanley bid for Symes (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/stanley-bid-for-symes-47027.html)

Fourth official 24-04-2009 12:34
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
It could be a last home game for a few more!! Just hope Cav gets his wish and it either rains or the pitch is watered so 'to encourage our passing game' (disguise a poor first touch)...

MCR ADIM 24-04-2009 12:38
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
Yes hes gone back to shrewsbury town so Lindfield will be our only first team striker. So might be 4 5 1 tomorrow

Bradshaw Boy 24-04-2009 13:21
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
stick Turner or McConville up front as well

cashman 24-04-2009 15:00
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 706739)
I don't think it's unfair on Symes or Lindfield to say that they have been the last resort of struggling League 2 clubs for the past couple of years. Indeed they are both giving their best for Stanley in their time here - and all credit to them for it - but the club should be in a position now as an established League side to be competitive in the transfer market.

I feel sorry for Coley. If our financial situation wasn't so laughable (ignoring £200k of investement, accounts not filed etc) he could be chasing the signature of a player like Danny Carlton, not settling for unwanted players. That's probably not fair and certainly only speculation, but it's what fans are reduced to when there seems to have been so many missed opportunities by the club over the past few years to advance as a professional outfit.
please explain how shaker?, they are in a position to be competitive in transfer market, and why they should be? given their resources.:confused:

shakermaker 24-04-2009 15:10
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
Sorry cashy I haven't a clue what you're asking?

cashman 24-04-2009 15:13
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
Originally Posted by shakermaker View Post
- but the club should be in a position now as an established League side to be competitive in the transfer market.--------------- why?n how? given the resources available.:confused:

shakermaker 24-04-2009 15:27
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman (Post 707556)
Originally Posted by shakermaker View Post
- but the club should be in a position now as an established League side to be competitive in the transfer market.--------------- why?n how? given the resources available.:confused:
That's just the thing - if opportunity after opportunity with everything from Google Page Ranking to merchandise to even selling the club at the right time hadn't been missed, then there'd be a large possibility that we could have more resources now.
Our management team have shown that they can not only survive in this league but compete to some extent, and potential like that is let down by the lack of business nouse at the club in recent years, which is becoming clear now.
Like I said in my original post there's a lot of unfair specualtion there but from the outside looking in, the club have missed opportunities that would've allowed the management team to prosper. This practice seems to be continuing by ignoring Ilyas Khan.

Wynonie Harris 24-04-2009 15:50
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 707564)
This practice seems to be continuing by ignoring Ilyas Khan.
In fact, we've still not had a sensible answer from the club about why they won't talk to Ilyas.

cashman 24-04-2009 16:01
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 707564)
That's just the thing - if opportunity after opportunity with everything from Google Page Ranking to merchandise to even selling the club at the right time hadn't been missed, then there'd be a large possibility that we could have more resources now.
Our management team have shown that they can not only survive in this league but compete to some extent, and potential like that is let down by the lack of business nouse at the club in recent years, which is becoming clear now.
Like I said in my original post there's a lot of unfair specualtion there but from the outside looking in, the club have missed opportunities that would've allowed the management team to prosper. This practice seems to be continuing by ignoring Ilyas Khan.
fair point shaker ta fer clarifying.:)

lancsdave 24-04-2009 16:35
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris (Post 707571)
In fact, we've still not had a sensible answer from the club about why they won't talk to Ilyas.
They won't know anybody is asking ;)

MCR ADIM 24-04-2009 16:41
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
Also on back page of Accy Ob Coley and Jimmy in contract talks
:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D :D

Just hope we can keep the players for next season and none of them get tempted away!

VALAIRIAN 24-04-2009 16:49
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCR ADIM (Post 707521)
Yes hes gone back to shrewsbury town so Lindfield will be our only first team striker. So might be 4 5 1 tomorrow
Got to be worth either trying Andy Smith up front or using Milesy further up and using Bobby Grant. We also have McConville as well??

fc:stanley 24-04-2009 16:57
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
Id stick turner up front with his pace.

VALAIRIAN 24-04-2009 17:00
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fc:stanley (Post 707609)
Id stick turner up front with his pace.
I'd prefer that boy Chris Turner to play down the righhht, personally and use that pace to beat defenders and get the ball into the box...

VALAIRIAN 24-04-2009 17:02
Re: Stanley bid for Symes
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCR ADIM (Post 707521)
Yes hes gone back to shrewsbury town so Lindfield will be our only first team striker. So might be 4 5 1 tomorrow
No mention on the Accy Website, just talks about injuries ???? Its amazing we know about anything to do with Stanley that does not involve money ???


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:09.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com