FOA Bagpuss
 

Sir
Yep well done for dragging your feet for 3 years missing out on grants and then at the last minute lying to the fans and putting seats on the Clayton End, cheers.

Can you post anything positive about ASFC???:mad:

In this comment and one more recently, you seem to indicate that I only post propaganda.

For that season I have only been veiwing this site for a while and can fully understand why the club have distanced itself form Accyweb.

I believe that this last 10 days or so, despite the issue with the Player of the Year booking, we have seen what makes Accrington Stanley so special as a club.

Staff and supporters working as a team for the common good of the club we all love.

Players and management meeting with fans on a regular basis.

Can we take forward this superb spirit to drive us forward?? I believe we can; however can we all be positive??

Yes mistakes are made, but lets focus not spend all our life focusing on them!!

If you fancy a pint in the Crown, PM me and I gladly discuss any issue you have:)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Yes Sir I can, the foofball side of Stanley has been far better this year and I believe getting John and Jimmy to sign new contracts is a good move. The fact that Eric is leaving is also a positive for the club, despite all he has done his departure is the way forward.

Always smiling Bagpuss:rolleyes:

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

THANK YOU:):):)

The offer of a pint still stands:rolleyes:

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Well worth taking SR up on his offer, Baggy. Going for a pint with him is an interesting and pleasant experience and may make you look at things in a slightly different light.

It even stopped me whinging for awhile. ;) :D

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

spot on baggy, pity southern red thinks its right to distance from the crap.:rolleyes: still suppose its right as the club seem to ignore the fans wi it.:rolleyes:

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Here we have a Director and friend to many on here offering to chat meet up and even get the beers in :):) Like Wyonie says take Mark up on his offer...

Some of the crap that was posted on Accyweb was Slanderous when the club removed the link. If the club were in any way connected with some of the wording even by association they would have been wide open to all sorts of potential claims.

I for one didnt like the link being removed but when it was pointed out to me why then i fully agreed with the decision, The club could have explained the reasoning but chose not to ?? now thats their call... i suspect they didnt want any further hassle.

Onwards and upwards chaps lets not fall out it's been a great season.

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

That was more to do with his perversion than his integrity :D

( PS Have you got any photos from today ;) )

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

more to the point Bagpusses avatar has extremely salacious overtones, o.k. the tongue isn't quite up to speed but not a bad effort.

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Liz is a very nice person who works very hard selling tickets for the 50/50 draw, I made an offer and she accepted, it was a business deal, end of.:D;)


Sorry Slerpy changed my avatar to something a bit more suitable:p

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

This has been bugging me so I made time to investigate what the hell you were talking about, I've spoken to different people in the know, friends with legal knowledge and the opinion is what was posted on accyweb was NOT slanderous, nothing that was posted would have left the club wide open to all sorts of potential claims, in fact it was just a smokescreen because certain people at the club didn't like being questioned or just couldn't be arsed so it was simply removed, out of sight out of mind, a bit like the treatment of Mr Khan.:(

Feel free to post a link to all the slanderous material if you like, but I doubt you even know what it was.;)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Give us a gree, like me knows that exact reasons.

You know why?? because he paid his money, then asked an official a question, then got the answer.

And you know thats what makes ASFC special. That's what we need to market.

If your bored get on the Bury message board, hilarious!!! Now complaining that some of their seats had bird muck on them on Saturday. They want to know why the groundstaff can't clean them!!! Somebody has suggested a working party in the summer,( not my job, I'm a supporter not a cleaner) another wants the youth team to do the job, others say employ more cleaners!!! As if a league 2 club can afford a seat cleaner!!

Come to Accy and the Ultras who want to stand on the Clayton End come and spend several nights fitting seats. Even the Cowshed regulars join in the work.

Thats what makes us special, fans who MATTER!!!!:):)

The offer of a pint STILL stands!!:rolleyes:

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Don't start on me again, the guy made a statement I checked it out and along with some others that know don't agree with him. Why the speech about Bury fans and so on was brought into this I don't know, some would say this is an attempt to change the subject, please feel free to post a link to the slanderous posts if you're so sure.;)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

I get it know, anyone who mutters anything derogatory against the club doesn't matter.;):)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Sir

I really haven't got the time to re-post the comment.

If you really want to know PM me and I'll explain.

And no, IMHO the club don't surpress anything!!

And yes ALL our fans matter!!

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Apart from maybe, the link to this messageboard?!?!???

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Well I've now had enough of Accrington Stanley taking advantage of everyone, and especially not listening to its own fans... I'm shocked at what I'm reading these days, especially from the clubs own representatives. Should accyweb continue to have an ASFC section? An asfc section that costs us money to run? Why the hell did I even bother to make the site into a red theme, specially for them? It is obvious the club has a problem with this forum, maybe they are afraid of the truth? Maybe they are afraid of being called incompetent at running a club? Well, I have no problem in continuing the accrington stanley section of this website, but I'd like to know what everyone else thinks. If they can't even be bothered to link to us or listen to the fans, why should I pay for the bandwidth for their publicity? I've never had anything said to me about any problems, now people are saying things have been libelous.

Perhaps I should just calm down?

Am I making a mountain out of a molehill? I don't know, but from what I've just read.... **** em!

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Nice one. :)

I've never met Bagpuss, and we've certainly had our disagreements on this messageboard, but this sort of attack is certainly going to backfire.

I have met you SR, and know your heart and energy are in the right place. But, if you'd been following the messageboard over the last few years, you'd have realised there is a deafening silence from those contributors "in the know" about matters sensitive to the club, including its treatment of fans.
The potential to be "negative" is enormous, but little used.

I think the older wave of fans, who have helped build the club, many of whom have told me, "the club don't want to know anymore", will be looking on your comments with a wry smile. The ones who are doing it now, well good on them, and lets hope they don't feel the same in a few years time.

I hope you and Bagpuss have your pint.

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

If the information as to why the link was removed is available by pm, why can't it be made public. Maybe it would stop people getting getting annoyed, and maybe the problem could be rectified ?

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

I hope it has two straws. :)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

I, for one, would like this messageboard to continue, and I love the red theme. http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/i...cons/icon7.gif
This board may not have a link from the fishy site anymore, but it is still a Stanley messageboard and very important to us.
Thanks.

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Seconded! I was annoyed when the link to the messageboard was removed from t'fishy site, but I've changed my way of thinking...this is an independent messageboard for independent-minded fans!

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Yes please :). We need the forum. I wish there was less unthinking destructive criticism, but there is plenty that is constructive and healthy and the club do occasionally respond positively in a roundabout way (e.g. perhaps averting the potential OSC end-of season party fiasco). It also provides the opportunity to let off steam which some messageboarders do seem to need! I do wish the club hadn't cut the link, which sent a very strange message. I suppose thinking back I've seen plenty of posts which might be considered to be slander of individuals by individuals, but nothing for which (in my humble non-legal opinion) the club could conceivably be held responsible. I have no doubt the link was cut simply because the messageboard annoyed the powers-that-be - odd as they don't usually come across as desperately sensitive flowers.

But reverting to Roy's question - yes yes yes!

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Still think Baggy should go for that pint with SR, though!

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

yeh think it through Roy, if ya removed it, ya would probably suit those ******* right down to the ground. fer my money its a good section fer folk to praise, let off steam about what they see aint right.at least the guy who i think ya got the hump wi, as the balls to come on here, don't know him but i give him credit fer that.:)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

"Folk" have used the forum for their own personal agenda, the forum ain't at fault; the fans who rush home to air their greivances towards the club on here are the ones at fault....

The club is contactable for all that crap IMHO. Anyone can chat to Eric or Rob or Mick Schultz or Coley.

Its easy for this to be used as a soap box. I have read "fans" slagging every member of the club staff on here. So why shouldn't the club remove the link? We have such a great club yet on here, you would think the world is ending.

The content of the threads on here used to be top drawer. Now Jimbo hardly posts, Lowiey the same. Unfortunately, only the negative stuff is discussed on here because , in the main, the positive posters have left the building

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

It takes no balls to post on here though, & that I think is the problem!

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

It takes no balls to be a sheep wearing red tinted specs, SR got involved when it was Give Us The Old Gree who should have answered the question.

Fcuk it I can't be arsed anymore baa baa:)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Please keep the Accy Stan section Roy .. its the thing that makes me feel part of the Accy Stan 'family'.

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

well willie miller, my post was in a response to the guy who OWNS the site,asking if the stanley section should remain, that was my answer n reason to keep it, also i forgot to add that folk who follow stanley n live abroad or a fair distance keep in touch through it so thats another reason. as fer soap boxes, you got on yours with yer bias, but never answered his question yes or no, therefore i can only assume the question was too difficult fer ya.:rolleyes: and as fer southern red saying nothing is suppressed by the club, i say that is bull or even untrue, most fans cannot understand why the club refuses to talk to Mr Khan:confused: if thats not suppression i don't know what is.:(

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Who tagged this topic? :-)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Well said Roy, i was waiting for you to comment on this subject, if the club had any issues as anybody else there is a pm system or even mail the admin should there be any serious problems, i know Roy is very aware of any legal implications cos it doesnt effect the club but himself more. I know both baggy & SR reasonably well, & having talked to both seperately, both are passionate with their point of view but mutually they have the club at heart. Think Baggy particulary is made a scape goat, because he does voice his point of view as he sees it - regardless of whether its the populas view or not but that is his view agreed with or not. Baggy come to the osc meeting, SR makes regular appearance & think a good opportunity for both of u & soon see whether the views can be acted appropiately on - just a suggestion lol!!

I have spoken my views on here & with the club people, i do beleive the club still needs to connect more with the fans & listen with hope to rectify problems such as whats voiced on this board, big reason why fans come on here to air their views is because they have tried in vain to speak to the club & yet have felt or appeared to be ignored by least not trying to act on issues - that is the pinnacle reason for the views on message board & a causation from the club itself, is IMHO, seems its one way street rather than take the good with the bad from the message board. Trust me many great ideas, insight to fans opinion & a great opportunity for the club to know whats good whats bad within the club & service, makes it a damn sight easier to pinpoint the problem areas to correct & keep it up with the good areas. The amusing thing is that if the club want something or need help, they come here but once a problem arises, its 'oh winging fans' bury head in sand attitude, message board is rubbish etc, but thats my point of view.

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

I already know but others are still in the dark please post a link to the offending thread so everybody can have a read.;)

"Give us the old gree" you started this up again by posting some crap about slander, I see no evidence, please provide some for us all and for Roy in case he has to get his legal team on it.:rolleyes:

THE LINK WAS REMOVED BECAUSE CERTAIN PEOPLE WHERE BEING MADE TO LOOK AMATUER AND SHIRKED THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES, NOTHING TO DO WITH SLANDER.:(

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

The first and the last? ;)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

No matter how many times I read this thread I can't help but obsess with the grammatical error FOA, insstead of FAO.

Anybody else?

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

I spotted it but wouldn't say I'm obsessed ....:eek:

As I discovered to my annoyance, you can't edit a thread title even if you spot a typo immediately after you've posted the thread-starter - you just have to live with the embarassment :(

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Don't worry everytime it looks like it will drop off the front page I will post and keep it going until "Give Us The Old Gree" shows us some evidence of slander.:confused:

BTW "Gree" bugs me I keep want to put an "N" on the end, must have run out of letters when registering.:rolleyes:

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Or an 'F'. ;)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Is it too late to change this to, "the last straw and the short straw?"

Thought so. :(

It's all about timing, isn't it. :o

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

think ya will have a long wait baggy, just oer 200 posts in two n half years, perhaps someone could run a sweep on when it will be?:D;)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Very good Shaker:D

Sorry Oggy I didn't get yours yet.;)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

surprised nobody has said that maybe you should check your own posts first before going on about grammatical errors and possibly spelling mistakes:confused:

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Despite making an appearence to the forum yesterday, "Give us the old gree" failed to show any evidence of slander on accyweb, therefore I will take it that I was correct and he has crawled back into a hole in shame.;):)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Bump !

Still waiting "Give us the old gree".

THE LINK WAS REMOVED BECAUSE CERTAIN PEOPLE WHERE BEING MADE TO LOOK AMATUER AND SHIRKED THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES, NOTHING TO DO WITH SLANDER.