Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   v Rovers (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/v-rovers-49920.html)

maccawozzagod 13-10-2009 19:58

v Rovers
 
... just had an update from Loweiy.

Rovers fans dont recognise half their team

Stanley fans dont recognise half their team

Rovers winning 2-0

crowd of around 2000!!!!!!!!

maccawozzagod 13-10-2009 20:00

Re: v Rovers
 
ya buggers, just seen some updates on another thread!

cmonstanley 13-10-2009 20:02

Re: v Rovers
 
ive heard stanley have just scored
:confused:

lancsdave 13-10-2009 20:02

Re: v Rovers
 
2-1 now

My spy tells me it was Symes

ddevil2006 13-10-2009 20:13

Re: v Rovers
 
Starting lineup
Dunbavin
Sourice
Rimmer
Murphy
Melo
Joyce
Miles
Lloyd
king
mcconville
ami

subs
ryan
grant
symes
procter
turner
lees
winnard
edwards

att- 2453

lancsdave 13-10-2009 20:21

Re: v Rovers
 
3-1

MCR ADIM 13-10-2009 20:22

Re: v Rovers
 
Good attendance, mostly youth players but good for them to play against premier league side, and get the eye of coley!

lancsdave 13-10-2009 20:29

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ddevil2006 (Post 753234)
att- 2453

Think that might have shocked a few, and blown my guess the gate out of the water :D

Outback Ozzy 13-10-2009 20:43

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 753240)
Think that might have shocked a few, and blown my guess the gate out of the water :D

Mine too Dave, Mick Schultz was expecting just over 1,000 and closed the away end from what I heard.

lancsdave 13-10-2009 20:45

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Outback Ozzy (Post 753241)
Mine too Dave, Mick Schultz was expecting just over 1,000 and closed the away end from what I heard.

Yes he did close it, based on ticket sales at Rovers of about 120. Looks like lots paid on the gate, or turned up from elsewhere. Wonder if they had to open the away end eventually.

Outback Ozzy 13-10-2009 20:47

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 753243)
Yes he did close it, based on ticket sales at Rovers of about 120. Looks like lots paid on the gate, or turned up from elsewhere. Wonder if they had to open the away end eventually.

Cannot understand ticket sales at Blackburn when it was always pay on the gate! and if they did open the away end at least it is a dry night, well it is here in Wigan

Doug 13-10-2009 20:54

Re: v Rovers
 
Rob's going on 2br just before 10, fantastic; just as go out again....

mab 13-10-2009 21:07

Re: v Rovers
 
:)Just got back !!2 and a quorter sides open awayend clossed seemed more than the acctual att but well done Rovers fans and Accy fans for turning up also blew my guess out of the water..Good game cracking goals and one to watch for the future Louis Melo for stanley he was excelent as was all who played.:)

Nickelson 13-10-2009 21:09

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mab (Post 753251)
one to watch for the future Louis Melo for stanley he was excelent as was all who played.:)

He is the one Lutel brought up to the club for them to look at. He has been playing in reserves and vs Burnley. Where he looked good there.

Outback Ozzy 13-10-2009 21:12

Re: v Rovers
 
Was anyone impressed by what Rob Heys had to say, for those that did not hear it, the club are hoping to raise approximately £150k through the SOS and the directors possibly putting in a further £100k ie £58k short. Are the HMRC going to accept this? or will they shut us down because we are short. To me it seems that the HMRC would be fools to close the club down because we are £58k short. But there must be assurances from the club that this remaining money will be paid by the end of the tax year 2009/2010. Lets hope so. Worried me - your darn tooting I am.

Reamer 13-10-2009 21:13

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 753243)
Yes he did close it, based on ticket sales at Rovers of about 120. Looks like lots paid on the gate, or turned up from elsewhere. Wonder if they had to open the away end eventually.


They eventually opened the cowshed seating area as the clayton end began to get packed. The away end remained closed though

lancsdave 13-10-2009 21:23

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Outback Ozzy (Post 753254)
and the directors possibly putting in a further £100k ie £58k short.


Possibly :confused:

mab 13-10-2009 21:40

Re: v Rovers
 
:( £58k short after the Directors have put in and thats it!! After Turning down £250K thats it no we'l get the rest:(

Dan 13-10-2009 21:46

Re: v Rovers
 
I'll have the Rob Heys interview on the 2BR website in the next hour or so for anyone that missed it...

bdc 13-10-2009 21:50

Re: v Rovers
 
Did anyone see the shares option in the programme? It was a limited number of 1000 shares for £250 plus VAT each. I personally think it is wrong to be doing something like this just weeks after Ilyas requested a share issue. What is so wrong about ASSF asking for a share issue for £500k?

Doug 13-10-2009 22:01

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mab (Post 753265)
:( £58k short after the Directors have put in and thats it!! After Turning down £250K thats it no we'l get the rest:(


I don’t think that’s what Rob said; what I got was the £150k from the fund, £100k from the club and some short term loans form willing bods until all the schemes are played out, It was Dan at the end of the report that mentioned the £150k from the Fund + £100k from the Directors. Either way it would appear that they have done what they needed to do.

A fantastic response from Blackburn Rovers and their Supporters, as well as Accy and all the neutrals that came and showed us that we’re not alone. A good day for all of us.

mab 13-10-2009 22:04

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bdc (Post 753267)
Did anyone see the shares option in the programme? It was a limited number of 1000 shares for £250 plus VAT each. I personally think it is wrong to be doing something like this just weeks after Ilyas requested a share issue. What is so wrong about ASSF asking for a share issue for £500k?

:confused:So Wheres the money raised through this share issue going to go??If the club had done this 6wks ago the club would have been saved then we still would have had aVice-Chairman ie Mr Marsden and Ilyas Khan would still be a mager share holder and the (we) supporters would have been sleeping easyer and not out with Begging bouls to everyone:rolleyes:

Doug 13-10-2009 22:05

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bdc (Post 753267)
Did anyone see the shares option in the programme? It was a limited number of 1000 shares for £250 plus VAT each. I personally think it is wrong to be doing something like this just weeks after Ilyas requested a share issue. What is so wrong about ASSF asking for a share issue for £500k?

Why is it wrong; I know Mr. Khan wanted to underwrite an issue that would have favoured the ASSF; but the club is entiteled to release a ltd share issue if it wants.

Doug 13-10-2009 22:06

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bdc (Post 753267)
Did anyone see the shares option in the programme? It was a limited number of 1000 shares for £250 plus VAT each. I personally think it is wrong to be doing something like this just weeks after Ilyas requested a share issue. What is so wrong about ASSF asking for a share issue for £500k?


Any chance of getting it scaned?

bdc 13-10-2009 22:14

Re: v Rovers
 
I personally think it's wrong mainly because fans have been donating thousands of pounds to the SOS fund and not getting anything in return. If the club would have done something like this 6 weeks ago then I think it could've enticed them into investing money into the club via shares and this coupled with the ASSF offer would've meant the club could be run by the fans. It seems to me that the club have just been waiting for people to put as much into the SOS so that the directors have less to put in themselves. I also think the price of £250 is very unrealistic in the current credit crunch, there will be some people that will take it up but what happens if the club gets wound up? The shares will be worth nothing and the fans will be out of pocket.

Dan 13-10-2009 22:16

Re: v Rovers
 
The Rob interview is now here - 2br -

He did indeed say 150K from the SOS fund, 100K in investment from directors and the remainder in short term loans.

Expect more details tomorrow - will do my best to keep you up to date!
Dan

Doug 13-10-2009 22:17

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan (Post 753279)
The Rob interview is now here - 2br -

He did indeed say 150K from the SOS fund, 100K in investment from directors and the remainder in short term loans.

Expect more details tomorrow - will do my best to keep you up to date!
Dan

Cheer's Dan.....:)

lancsdave 13-10-2009 22:22

Re: v Rovers
 
88k in the pot so far, 61k short. Where's that going to come from?
Possible 15k tonight still leaves a big hole:confused:

Doug 13-10-2009 22:29

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bdc (Post 753276)
I personally think it's wrong mainly because fans have been donating thousands of pounds to the SOS fund and not getting anything in return. If the club would have done something like this 6 weeks ago then I think it could've enticed them into investing money into the club via shares and this coupled with the ASSF offer would've meant the club could be run by the fans. It seems to me that the club have just been waiting for people to put as much into the SOS so that the directors have less to put in themselves. I also think the price of £250 is very unrealistic in the current credit crunch, there will be some people that will take it up but what happens if the club gets wound up? The shares will be worth nothing and the fans will be out of pocket.


A little under £300 to say you own shares in Accrington Stanley; I haven't got it to spare and she'll kill me if she got wind of it; but i will have it before the end of the week... :D

simon 13-10-2009 22:54

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bdc (Post 753267)
Did anyone see the shares option in the programme? It was a limited number of 1000 shares for £250 plus VAT each. I personally think it is wrong to be doing something like this just weeks after Ilyas requested a share issue. What is so wrong about ASSF asking for a share issue for £500k?

From the info out there at Moment I agree WRONG, but we need to see the Details ?

How do these shares count in the 100% of total shares ?
Does this affect other shareholders % ie 51% becoming 45% ?
How do the club value 'B' shares ?
How are they valueing(?) the club ?

So many Questions.....

And WHY now ???????????????????????????????????????????????

Outback Ozzy 13-10-2009 23:03

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by simon (Post 753298)
From the info out there at Moment I agree WRONG, but we need to see the Details ?

How do these shares count in the 100% of total shares ?
Does this affect other shareholders % ie 51% becoming 45% ?
How do the club value 'B' shares ?
How are they valueing(?) the club ?

So many Questions.....

And WHY now ???????????????????????????????????????????????

Fully agree with you Simon, from what I have read on Accy Web, it would appear that Ilyas and ASSF have been well and truly stitched up. This is exactly how to alienate fans of the club, except true fans will not allow it to happen. I'm with Doug on this one, my missus will kill me, but I will try my damnedest to get the money together, before purchasing a share of the club I love.

PS a good way out of Do'N and other directors not getting their hands in their own pockets.

:rolleyes::confused::cool:

Grimps 13-10-2009 23:11

Re: v Rovers
 
like a lot of players rovers had out there hope jc and jb had a look at them to plus number 29 for use was very good and the thik number 22 for use was **** hot plus bavs was very good in sec haft

Mik Griff 14-10-2009 00:40

Re: v Rovers
 
Bee Ami looked good tonight I thought.

Redraine 14-10-2009 16:55

Re: v Rovers
 
Credit from Rovers fans:-

"Agree with BR FC, I thought Stanley did well. They looked good technically, perhaps were slightly slower than Rovers but most of the match was fairly even. Rovers had 5 or 6 good shooting opportunities which they didn't take but passed instead and I wondered if that was deliberate, so as to let Stanley off the hook?

Well done to Stanley fans for making a lot noise throughout the game. Stanley deserve to survive just because of you lot. Trouble is there's not enough of you at about 1000 a game. I hope the management can find ways to attract more fans."

theresonlyoneaccy 14-10-2009 20:17

Re: v Rovers
 
I'm assuming nobody has any highlights or the goals?

mab 14-10-2009 20:48

Re: v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by theresonlyoneaccy (Post 753598)
I'm assuming nobody has any highlights or the goals?

:)It was on sky sports news this morning!goals and a JC interview,buti mist it as well:(


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:34.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com