Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Rob Heys (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/rob-heys-50182.html)

expatriate 29-10-2009 19:48

Rob Heys
 
Good evening everyone - and a very special evening since its the first time in ages that i am able to enjoy two nights on the trot in Accy. Sheer bliss !

I have been following the comments about Rob, and feel compelled to make this statement. I know this will not be something many of you agree upon - and that is the great thing about open and transparent debate that we can disagree but maintain a courteous dignity and an open mind - but here goes.

I have known Rob for many years. In fact I have known and worked with Rob in good times and in bad. It is my view that the worst that Rob can be accused of is being exceedingly naive, and commercially quite silly. I would also say that Rob is probably just as much a victim as the rest of us. Possibly more so than most.

I would encourage and urge you all to please take into account the difficult circumstances he has to face. His statements have indeed at times been proven to be incorrect, but even when he has "lied" i believe he was simply working off information he was given. I would also say that it is my honest opinion that on Friday night, Rob believed that the club was going to make good on its obligations. Its not his fault that he was let down by people who did lie and who have actively misled us all.
I would close by saying I happen to know (ie i have incontrovertible proof) that Rob has tried all he can to mortgage his house. He also contributed thousands to the HMRC payment - again in stark and amazing contrast to ALL OTHER DIRECTORS.

I respectfully would ask you all to bear this in mind. Even if you believe that Rob is guilty of acts and statements that are horrible (I can think of at least two statements that were plainly stupid), I would ask that you think of his circumstances. He is often the last man standing, and the only person who actually gets on with the job.

I guess this will open the floodgates, and i am prepared to hear awful things, but I for one do not want to see this personal animosity grow. He is a true fan, "stanley till i die" is branded on his heart. Like many of the rest of us. He is a brother who has erred. Lets forgive him, and lets look forward.


good evening,
Ilyas

baldy 29-10-2009 20:00

Re: Rob Heys
 
One of the best posts in a long while!

Stanleymad 29-10-2009 20:01

Re: Rob Heys
 
Wow ok amazed he had risked his own home for stanley. It makes me more angry at don and Ew imho allowing rob to risk a lot and no doubt doesn't have much plus a young family to consider grr sorry feel quite annoyed. Glad u have enjoyed time at home ilyas :)

Willie Miller 29-10-2009 20:09

Re: Rob Heys
 
Here Here

baldy 29-10-2009 20:13

Re: Rob Heys
 
I personally think if we had a club where transparency was used, Rob would be a quality asset.

I feel under EW and the DON, Rob has had to go along with whatever they say, The fact that he has gone as far as he has to mortgage hes house when he has a young family to support, shows hes passion and hes commitment cannot be questioned IMHO!

I hope he will still be at the club in the long term.

If Rob didn't work for the club, He would be in the "Sophia Khan stand" every week with a Stanley scarf! FACT!

Shurm 29-10-2009 20:17

Re: Rob Heys
 
When I went to see Mr O'Neil and Rob a few weeks ago Rob said he was remortgaging his house to raise funds for the club and he said other Directors were going to put money in, at that point I asked Rob if he was now a Director and he replied no but he was still intending to remortgage his home.

I didn't feel it was right at the time to mention this as he asked me not to and this is one of the reasons I truly believed with people like him there the club would be saved.

I think personally he has been very naive and should probably have resigned if he felt that the club was not being run properly however it must be an awful decision to make when you love the job you do and you have a young family to support as well.

I'm sure there is a position for Rob at the club in some capacity whether it be CEO or otherwise.

cashman 29-10-2009 20:38

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shurm (Post 758326)

I think personally he has been very naive and should probably have resigned if he felt that the club was not being run properly however it must be an awful decision to make when you love the job you do and you have a young family to support as well.

I'm sure there is a position for Rob at the club in some capacity whether it be CEO or otherwise.

right after digesting ilyas post n yours shurm, am quite prepared to accept he has been naive n stupid, i can also accept what both of ya are saying, reason being you both obviously know a lot more than i, don't know you shurm, but trust ilyas 100%, he had no need whatsoever to start this thread, given the way he has been treated, speaks volumes fer the guy in my book.;)

LongLostSon 29-10-2009 20:39

Re: Rob Heys
 
Thankyou for the insight Ilyas. Only met Rob once or twice during Unibond/Conference days so obviously not able to judge his character for myself. Had suspected from radio interviews that maybe he was being used as a puppet.

Redskin 29-10-2009 20:55

Re: Rob Heys
 
It is extremely disappointing, to say the least, the way some people are being treated!.......There is just no need for some of the things to have been said!.......a little knowledge is a very dangerous thing..:(

Doug 29-10-2009 20:57

Re: Rob Heys
 
Thank you Mr. Khan. I’m not sure I would want my friends (if I had any) to be that candid in their appraisal of me. However; I am both pleased and relieved at your post and I hope that this mans actions that have gone unpublished until today go some way to softening some hearts on this site towards this gentlemen.

Redskin 29-10-2009 20:59

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 758350)
Thank you Mr. Khan. I’m not sure I would want my friends (if I had any) to be that candid in their appraisal of me. However; I am both pleased and relieved at your post and I hope that this mans actions that have gone unpublished until today go some way to softening some hearts on this site towards this gentlemen.


Here, Here, a True Gentleman that I am Proud to stand next to and call my Friend!

cashman 29-10-2009 21:07

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 758350)
Thank you Mr. Khan. I’m not sure I would want my friends (if I had any) to be that candid in their appraisal of me. However; I am both pleased and relieved at your post and I hope that this mans actions that have gone unpublished until today go some way to softening some hearts on this site towards this gentlemen.

well doug its gone some way to softening my position towards heys, still far from happy about some of his recent actions, but understand a bit more now, n by the way i'm yer friend n i think yer n ugly git, to be perfectly candid.:D

Redskin 29-10-2009 21:09

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 758353)
well doug its gone some way to softening my position towards heys, still far from happy about some of his recent actions, but understand a bit more now, n by the way i'm yer friend n i think yer n ugly git, to be perfectly candid.:D


I was referring to Rob!

Chimer 29-10-2009 21:21

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shurm (Post 758326)
I think personally he has been very naive and should probably have resigned if he felt that the club was not being run properly however it must be an awful decision to make when you love the job you do and you have a young family to support as well.

Another reason for not resigning in such circumstances is a belief that if you stay put you might be able to do something to help, even if this means gritting your teeth and toeing the corporate line in public. From what those who know Rob have repeatedly said about him and his feelings for ASFC, I could believe (and do hope) this was the case. Ilyas' statement helps that hope along.

Whatever, someone has to keep doing the day-to-day stuff to keep the show on the road while the dust settles. Hanging the guy who is probably the only one who knows what is needed won't help.

Blessed are the peacemakers .......:)

cashman 29-10-2009 21:25

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 758353)
well doug its gone some way to softening my position towards heys, still far from happy about some of his recent actions, but understand a bit more now, n by the way i'm yer friend n i think yer n ugly git, to be perfectly candid.:D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskin (Post 758354)
I was referring to Rob!

so was i.:confused:

loweiy 29-10-2009 21:27

Re: Rob Heys
 
well said

AccyAggro 29-10-2009 21:52

Re: Rob Heys
 
Well said, makes you look at it all in a different way and how much more wrong DON was makin him follow all his instructions and telling him what to say like a little puppet

katei77 29-10-2009 22:12

Re: Rob Heys
 
[B]that Rob has tried all he can to mortgage his house. He also contributed thousands to the HMRC payment -
how many people would risk their home for their place of work?how many would risk going back to the better half and saying sorry love we might lose the home oh and i ve no job now,he could of very well risked his family and still could if the club does not do as well money wise in the coming months/years

again in stark and amazing contrast to ALL OTHER DIRECTORS.[/B]ASFC are not a rich club as well we know!this is not a time to single out directors for how much/little they gave many will not have £1000"s sat in the bank or the means to raise £1000"s,also remember along with fans many directors have given alot of time,day to day help and money over the years to ASFC

Even if you believe that Rob is guilty of acts and statements that are horrible
everyone makes mistakes,ok rob has messed up bigtime!but when you are told something enough times you do begin to believe it,especially when a offer is refused by a gentleman like Ilyas to rid of club of its debts,you would believe DON has the funds do it himself

He is a true fan, "stanley till i die" is branded on his heart.
i dont think anyone can say this untrue i also believe this is ture of most of the boardroom,note i said MOST

a little knowledge is a very dangerous thing
we really havent got a clue whats gone on and most likely wont have for along to come,the saying jury still out springs to mind untill we have all the full facts of the last 8weeks

Doug 29-10-2009 22:17

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 758353)
n by the way i'm yer friend n i think yer n ugly git, to be perfectly candid.:D


I may be :o but I'm proud to be Stanley and proud to be able to look over both walls ;)......anyway, Kisser said I was a good looking bloke......:D:D

N.B.

Bookends.......:D:D:)

DAV007 29-10-2009 22:49

Re: Rob Heys
 
Arent we missing the point. He has failed as a chief exec for years. He has told lies, just before court he told Iylas we had no other debt. Fan or not, he has no future as a chief exec. Get rid/new start/more capable person required.

Grimps 29-10-2009 23:06

Re: Rob Heys
 
im not the best in spelling so here we go . three things thats all im going to say. 1 lets just put all bend us . 2 turn in one gruop all fans and get bend jc and jb they are work very hard at keeping us in the league and cups . 3 if we can do that with no more crap going on we could make the play off s . pus its my brith day and we still have a club counld not live with no stanley up the reds

DevonStanley 29-10-2009 23:30

Re: Rob Heys
 
I've read (on here and elsewhere) that Ilyas Khan was prepared to bail out the club with no preconditions. While that's very worthy and no doubt many supporters would be grateful, it strikes me as barking.

Unless Mr Khan takes a shareholding for his cash injection - which he could in time pass on to the nascent supporters trust - there would seem to be little point as the club will, most likely, slip into the same debt problems again within not too long a period.

However, I don't think Mr Khan is barking, so no doubt there'll be discussions between Mr Khan and the current board as to what happens between now and next Wednesday. My only hope is that there are some more director resignations, Rob Heys is given a job he's possibly more suited to, and Mr Khan can assert some influence on deciding who will take the club forward.

Mr Matthew 30-10-2009 00:13

Re: Rob Heys
 
Thouroughly nice bloke, but lacking ability, we need and deserve better in that role. Keep him at the club but make him someone's assistant, train him to become an asset.

Kiwi John 30-10-2009 07:14

Re: Rob Heys
 
Totally agree with you Mr Khan.

flashy 30-10-2009 07:36

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DevonStanley (Post 758420)
Rob Heys is given a job he's possibly more suited to



Ball Boy?

Redraine 30-10-2009 07:50

Re: Rob Heys
 
He is STILL in denial. Dany asks him in today's Observer if the club would have been wound up without Ilyas and Peter's intervention and he replies, for the public record, - "It's impossible to say"! Also some guff about the club having made a profit in the last quarter.
What planet is he on?

VALAIRIAN 30-10-2009 08:06

Re: Rob Heys
 
My opinion - for what it is worth, RH I believe is a good chap, if there are wholesale changes at Stanley, it cannot be a good thing. Team, Coley & Co. Apart, review all staff/positions, but not just an enmass change. Let's give some/all people the chance to prove us wrong. :confused: :)

P.S. Big post IK :)

katei77 30-10-2009 08:09

Re: Rob Heys
 
I for one do not think any of us can question Rob Heys love and passion for the club,he is a fan first and foremost,and for this reason i think he should be given time to redeem himself,but i think he along with everyone else would agreed not as CE.

But what next?

We as fans have our own opinions,and should do,how boring would it be if we all agreeded?

As much as its the fans club it is a business.

But are we fans business qualified to say who should be the next CE?

Do we not now need someone who is not a fan,someone who will not allow their passion for club to cloud their business judgement?

Someone who will make business like decisions for the good of the business,who will not be afraid to make ruthless business decisions,who will not be afraid to turn down ideas for the good of the business,who will take fully calculated business risks(there is risks in business big or small,it can not be avoided)who will work within the business buget,who will deliver bad news to fans but have full reasons for why they are taking such actions,you again can not avoid bad news in business.

We as fans have thrown good money after bad,i dread to think of the times i ve delayed paying bills etc so i could make the next game,only last weekend we cancelled a week away to make the walk and game,we do not what a CE who will make decisions like this,oh sod it i wont pay that bill ill use the money for something else,not a way to run a successful business.

Yes who ever takes on this role should listen to us fans but they should not do something just to please us,they should only do things for the good of the business,if a player has to be sold for the good of business so be it,no matter how much we wish to keep a player they are asset to business and should be viewed as such.They should be able to explain why spending is happening in this dept of business and not others,why cut backs are be made,why they may have reduce out goings,even if it means job loses.This may not sit very well with some fans but it is how the business world works,In comings high out goings low!

I for one will want to able view the next CE profile in the business world before placing my faith in them,but faith we will have place in whoever takes on the CE post because like it or not they will be in charge of club and business.

cashman 30-10-2009 08:18

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VALAIRIAN (Post 758461)
My opinion - for what it is worth, RH I believe is a good chap, if there are wholesale changes at Stanley, it cannot be a good thing. Team, Coley & Co. Apart, review all staff/positions, but not just an enmass change. Let's give some/all people the chance to prove us wrong. :confused: :)

P.S. Big post IK :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redraine (Post 758458)
He is STILL in denial. Dany asks him in today's Observer if the club would have been wound up without Ilyas and Peter's intervention and he replies, for the public record, - "It's impossible to say"! Also some guff about the club having made a profit in the last quarter.
What planet is he on?

why do ya think it cannot be a good thing Val?:confused: MR Heys seemingly would not recognise the truth if it slapped him in the kisser, he aint even got the balls to hold his hands up to Mr Khan n Mr Marsden, whilst he may be a good chap n stanley through n through he has NOT the ability to be a CEO. IMHO.

lancsdave 30-10-2009 08:29

Re: Rob Heys
 
You can recruit the best people in the world, unless they are allowed to do the job they are paid for then it's a waste of time.

Tin Monkey 30-10-2009 08:46

Re: Rob Heys
 
I'm well aware of Rob's commitment to the club and I take on-board everything that has been said. However, he is very much a part of the recent regimes that have done nothing to adhere themselves to the hearts of the fans or the town.

While it's highly commendable that he was prepared to re-mortgage his home, it does nothing to remove the fact that he was complicit in the lies and deception which riddle the club at this point in time. The defense of "he was only following orders" doesn't stand and sentiment should not cloud people's judgments.

Far be it from me to call for someone to lose their job and their livelihood, but as long as the old regime remain in place, can anyone really see people trusting the club with investment ever again?

cashman 30-10-2009 08:47

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 758469)
You can recruit the best people in the world, unless they are allowed to do the job they are paid for then it's a waste of time.

whilst that is beyond dispute dave, what is not -is the fact we would have NO club without I.K. n P.M.s intervention, saying its impossible to know, is beyond the pale.:(

smudgie 30-10-2009 09:00

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey (Post 758473)
I'm well aware of Rob's commitment to the club and I take on-board everything that has been said. However, he is very much a part of the recent regimes that have done nothing to adhere themselves to the hearts of the fans or the town.

While it's highly commendable that he was prepared to re-mortgage his home, it does nothing to remove the fact that he was complicit in the lies and deception which riddle the club at this point in time. The defense of "he was only following orders" doesn't stand and sentiment should not cloud people's judgments.

Far be it from me to call for someone to lose their job and their livelihood, but as long as the old regime remain in place, can anyone really see people trusting the club with investment ever again?


couldent agree more.

Fatso 30-10-2009 09:21

Re: Rob Heys
 
It strikes me that if Mr Heys were to make any public comments about the handling of the situation that were of a negative nature, this would probably not go down very well with those who pay his wages. In the role he is in he has to be tactful in what he says, otherwise there is the distinct possibility of losing his job.

We do not know what restrictions he has been given on what he is and is not allowed to say, nor how many of his comments are those he has been instructed to say.

The first post in this thread makes great sense.

yonmon 30-10-2009 09:24

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey (Post 758473)
I'm well aware of Rob's commitment to the club and I take on-board everything that has been said. However, he is very much a part of the recent regimes that have done nothing to adhere themselves to the hearts of the fans or the town.

While it's highly commendable that he was prepared to re-mortgage his home, it does nothing to remove the fact that he was complicit in the lies and deception which riddle the club at this point in time. The defense of "he was only following orders" doesn't stand and sentiment should not cloud people's judgments.

Far be it from me to call for someone to lose their job and their livelihood, but as long as the old regime remain in place, can anyone really see people trusting the club with investment ever again?

Good Post TM !.....and whilst being in agreement with much of what IK had to say, in particular regarding RH's personal sacrifices, the need for some continuity in a transitional stage, and that he is, and that he always was and always will be a staunch supporter of Accrington Stanley...my main concern remains, and that is over a long period now if he, as CEO has been the one responsible for setting the objectives which would see Accrington Stanley maintaining itself as a successful entity both in the World of Soccer, and as an ongoing and developing Organisation...then to the most unskilled eye it is most obvious that these Objectives have failed !!.

My other concern is that unless New Management skills are introduced at the earliest opportunity, then the downward spiral towards Corporate oblivion will
persist !....

If RH , plus a skilled team of Strategist's can achieve a reversal of this, then nothing would please me more than to see this pleasant and amenable young man receiving the acclaim which will be his due!.....BUT ??????


Doug 30-10-2009 09:58

Re: Rob Heys
 
This may well be my last post.............


Your all dreaming….Accrington Stanley Football Club by rights should have been dead years ago, it’s been punching above its weight since its conception and the only reason it’s ever managed to survive is thought the effort and pockets of the people who have funded it too date…..this includes past and present owners, directors, shareholders and those walking through the gates on a Saturday and purchasing merchandise and those who have sponsored the club over the years.

It was the loss of sponsorship that thrust us into this crisis; yes poor judgement and inaptitude played a major role in bring us to this point, but it’s the lack of funding that is the root cause.

If you clear out the existing team you will have to find someone to replace them, someone who will be willing to tip in out of their own pockets (like Rob Hays who remortgaging his Home) like O’Neil who has put money and resources in; yes they are poor judges and their objectives where out of reach but they put time in for little, if any return.

Replace them with what; ASSF/ST a bunch of ultra dedicated supporters without two stones to rub together, holding down day jobs, giving what time they can spare between family and Bed? It will never work……I have tremendous respect for those of you I know and for those I don’t who put in a lot of time to support Stanley beyond the call; but realistically, are you going to have the time needed over and above what you are doing now to run a Football Club, where are you going to get the money to pay for these Football/Business savvy replacements (who will want to go home at 5.30 and have two days off and a big salary to boot.

Will Mr. Khan want to put his business objective on hold and rush to your aid every time you have a financial crisis…..because even he will have limits to be input?

Like or not we are a poor run down east Lancashire town football club with no money and few real friends in the world of business, if we weren’t we wouldn’t be in this ****.

Accrington Stanley was built on the backs of people who grafted and put their hands in their own pockets.

Mr. O’Neil took a big chance and fell down, He Promised he would not let Accrington Stanley Fold. Well he nearly did and must recognise that time is running out and he should act with honour and find a buyer. The rest should get on with there jobs and carry on moving this club forward until such time as it can finance itself……..

In three years time the ASSF/ST can possibly take control and we can all play our part. Unless you want to put your money where your mouths are and remortgage your homes to buy the club.

JEFF 30-10-2009 10:05

Re: Rob Heys
 
Rob Heys might have been PREPARED to re-mortgage his home BUT DID HE ???

We still await the £100,000 that the Directors promised to put in.

How much has O'Neill put in since he supposedly bought EW's shares ???

Redskin 30-10-2009 10:16

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 758487)
This may well be my last post.............


Your all dreaming….Accrington Stanley Football Club by rights should have been dead years ago, it’s been punching above its weight since its conception and the only reason it’s ever managed to survive is thought the effort and pockets of the people who have funded it too date…..this includes past and present owners, directors, shareholders and those walking through the gates on a Saturday and purchasing merchandise and those who have sponsored the club over the years.

It was the loss of sponsorship that thrust us into this crisis; yes poor judgement and inaptitude played a major role in bring us to this point, but it’s the lack of funding that is the root cause.

If you clear out the existing team you will have to find someone to replace them, someone who will be willing to tip in out of their own pockets (like Rob Hays who remortgaging his Home) like O’Neil who has put money and resources in; yes they are poor judges and their objectives where out of reach but they put time in for little, if any return.

Replace them with what; ASSF/ST a bunch of ultra dedicated supporters without two stones to rub together, holding down day jobs, giving what time they can spare between family and Bed? It will never work……I have tremendous respect for those of you I know and for those I don’t who put in a lot of time to support Stanley beyond the call; but realistically, are you going to have the time needed over and above what you are doing now to run a Football Club, where are you going to get the money to pay for these Football/Business savvy replacements (who will want to go home at 5.30 and have two days off and a big salary to boot.

Will Mr. Khan want to put his business objective on hold and rush to your aid every time you have a financial crisis…..because even he will have limits to be input?

Like or not we are a poor run down east Lancashire town football club with no money and few real friends in the world of business, if we weren’t we wouldn’t be in this ****.

Accrington Stanley was built on the backs of people who grafted and put their hands in their own pockets.

Mr. O’Neil took a big chance and fell down, He Promised he would not let Accrington Stanley Fold. Well he nearly did and must recognise that time is running out and he should act with honour and find a buyer. The rest should get on with there jobs and carry on moving this club forward until such time as it can finance itself……..

In three years time the ASSF/ST can possibly take control and we can all play our part. Unless you want to put your money where your mouths are and remortgage your homes to buy the club.


Well said!.........I feel the same way!..I've seen too much, heard too much and know too much, but obviously not enough!

Best Regards to all and here's hoping that "Peace" can be found quickly!

Signing -off!
Gary

Stanleymad 30-10-2009 10:23

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 758487)
This may well be my last post.............


Your all dreaming….Accrington Stanley Football Club by rights should have been dead years ago, it’s been punching above its weight since its conception and the only reason it’s ever managed to survive is thought the effort and pockets of the people who have funded it too date…..this includes past and present owners, directors, shareholders and those walking through the gates on a Saturday and purchasing merchandise and those who have sponsored the club over the years.

It was the loss of sponsorship that thrust us into this crisis; yes poor judgement and inaptitude played a major role in bring us to this point, but it’s the lack of funding that is the root cause.

If you clear out the existing team you will have to find someone to replace them, someone who will be willing to tip in out of their own pockets (like Rob Hays who remortgaging his Home) like O’Neil who has put money and resources in; yes they are poor judges and their objectives where out of reach but they put time in for little, if any return.

Replace them with what; ASSF/ST a bunch of ultra dedicated supporters without two stones to rub together, holding down day jobs, giving what time they can spare between family and Bed? It will never work……I have tremendous respect for those of you I know and for those I don’t who put in a lot of time to support Stanley beyond the call; but realistically, are you going to have the time needed over and above what you are doing now to run a Football Club, where are you going to get the money to pay for these Football/Business savvy replacements (who will want to go home at 5.30 and have two days off and a big salary to boot.

Will Mr. Khan want to put his business objective on hold and rush to your aid every time you have a financial crisis…..because even he will have limits to be input?

Like or not we are a poor run down east Lancashire town football club with no money and few real friends in the world of business, if we weren’t we wouldn’t be in this ****.

Accrington Stanley was built on the backs of people who grafted and put their hands in their own pockets.

Mr. O’Neil took a big chance and fell down, He Promised he would not let Accrington Stanley Fold. Well he nearly did and must recognise that time is running out and he should act with honour and find a buyer. The rest should get on with there jobs and carry on moving this club forward until such time as it can finance itself……..

In three years time the ASSF/ST can possibly take control and we can all play our part. Unless you want to put your money where your mouths are and remortgage your homes to buy the club.

Im glad im still dreaming & hoping without that nothing is achieved - whilst i still live in this town, born & bred i will continue to support my beleloved club - foolishly or not. What ? so we all give up cos lets face it its not gonna make millions..........we KNOW that, what about our players arn't they worthy of a chance? Would rather go down on the sinking ship knowing that we god damned tried!!! The current board know the feelings & its our job to make them aware of the importance of OUR club its OUR duty to OUR players whom thro all of this have been totally professional & successful in the shadows - FOR THEM im willing to try as THEY have for us so far:D

alan7554 30-10-2009 10:26

Re: Rob Heys
 
for gods sake leave rob heys alone,he was only doing what he was told to do by the previous owner,who was apain in the arse to work for and who,s word was LAW,rob has been with asfc since the bad old days like going to horwich rmi, marine or even knowsley fc on a cold and wet wednesday night, yes he has made mistakes but it goes even further than that up to the very top of asfc,what about all these quotes from mr EW that the club is solvent and we owe nowt to the taxman, rob was employed on a need to know basis,and the former chairman is at fault for all this debt,fact the inland revenue bills were not paid when mr EW was in charge as the amount that asfc now owe to the IR now shows,Rob Heyes has done a hell of a lot for this club under a lot of pressure from the last owners to keep quiet,so give the lad abreak,would any of you lot have wanted the pressure and the job that he had,

lancsdave 30-10-2009 10:42

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 758487)
Replace them with what; ASSF/ST a bunch of ultra dedicated supporters without two stones to rub together, holding down day jobs, giving what time they can spare between family and Bed?

I wouldn't have thought that is the role of a Supporters trust. I presume the role is one similar to the role of school governors, they appoint people to do the work. If the club doesn't generate enough funds to pay for the rfull time positions then I am sure that there are many willing and able people to take on some of the less profile roles on a part/time volunteer basis. After all, many have offered in the past :rolleyes:

Chimer 30-10-2009 11:15

Re: Rob Heys
 
I broadly think along the same lines as Doug, though this won't be my last post and I hope the one above won't be his. I don't read that post as suggesting for a moment he will stop supporting Stanley, just that he is brassed off with trying to argue a moderate line in the face of all the (understandable) emotion that flies around this message board and getting howled down all the time.

Doug knows we need to work with reality - one reality, as I understand it, being that whoever (EW or DO'N) owns that 51% of the shares could call a shareholders' meeting tomorrow and carry a vote to shut down ASFC 1968 on the spot. Although we owed the taxman money in 1962, no external body wound us up then - it was the directors who chose to resign from the League. The current directors could do the same thing. In that event, even peace-loving me might be on the side of the lynch mob. But for now, we need to sort out a sensible way ahead and if to do so requires us to leave DO'N with some shred of self-respect and Rob with a job, so be it.

Bye-bye karma.

lancsdave 30-10-2009 11:27

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimer (Post 758510)
being that whoever (EW or DO'N) owns that 51% of the shares could call a shareholders' meeting tomorrow and carry a vote to shut down ASFC 1968 on the spot.


Wouldn't be a very good business decision though would it ?

Chimer 30-10-2009 11:38

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 758514)
Wouldn't be a very good business decision though would it ?

Nor was it in '62 ...... and how long is it since any good business decisions were made anyway?

Stanleymad 30-10-2009 11:52

Re: Rob Heys
 
Hold the queue if ew did that spiteful thing grr chester wouldn't be far enough away for him!

Tommy McQueen 30-10-2009 12:01

Re: Rob Heys
 
Just one question. If Rob Heys has put thousands into HM Tax. how come they only paid off £96,000. Thats looking even worse for the S.O.S fund.

Doug 30-10-2009 12:12

Re: Rob Heys
 
Mel; you are absolutely right to carry on with the passion you feel. What I’m saying is we have to recognise that we may well be stuck with what we’ve got and will for those very reasons you have highlighted; work with them.

Jeff; Khan said he has. If he hasn’t yet done it I wouldn’t blaming. If I had put my home and my family’s life on the line to save Accrington Stanley only to be met by the negativity on here I’d say **** um and walk away…He hasn’t and that means something, it’s got to do. My understanding is that O’Neil as done the same.

Dave: you know what you’re talking about, in two or three years time with proper financial support anything is possible, but in my opinion not at this time, and yes there will always be volunteers ( and I know what you allude too) my point is we would need volunteers with money in there pockets.

Chimer’s point is a good one and one I have alluded to in the past, if they wanted to be nasty they could shut the doors this afternoon and be ******. But they won’t and I don’t think they ever will.

The people in place now have and are putting money in other wise the lights wouldn’t come on and staff wouldn’t get paid. Very big mistakes have been made and there are no short quick fixes, we all know that yet some of us seem to be under the illusion that we can get shut of every one at the crown and live happily ever after on the back of Mr. Khan; actually his money.

When I wrote to Mr. Khan to thank him for what he did on Friday I said that every eye of every supporter would be on him for Direction and Leadership, now I have no idea what his agenda is but I am grateful for what he’s done… he knows better than the rest of us that little can change at the crown without massive financial investment.

The Board currently including Mr. O’Neil and Ms. Lazarus know the only way forward is to work with people like Mr. Khan and Mr. Marsden and the supporters of Accrington Stanley, while we are screaming for blood they aren’t going to be to receptive.

They have made a massive balls up and they have to make it right. Healing begins with all of us working together to make sure they don’t do it again.

Doug 30-10-2009 12:13

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy McQueen (Post 758518)
Just one question. If Rob Heys has put thousands into HM Tax. how come they only paid off £96,000. Thats looking even worse for the S.O.S fund.

I think he made a couple of donations to the fund like we did, could be wrong but it is Mr. Khan who is giving this information to us. Can he be trusted?

Stanleymad 30-10-2009 12:18

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 758520)
I think he made a couple of donations to the fund like we did, could be wrong but it is Mr. Khan who is giving this information to us. Can he be trusted?

Well more a lot than DON, Ilyas answered all q's - no ums or hopefullys or fudged the questions asked to him - thats what won people over. He was giving us info that the club were refusing to - plus prepared to back up his time at court with transcripts - media quoted same, things he couldnt guarentee - he made plain that he couldnt, best of all he had time for us - never had i ever seen that at the club before:eek:

Ps i had doubts but i met & spoke with the man personally he answered my qs:D

Stanleymad 30-10-2009 12:21

Re: Rob Heys
 
The board have got to go simple as that with exceptions maybe to MR T poss Rob in another role but Eric, Don & co must do the club one last favour & speak to all interested parties as to leave the club & let it be with people who can. Not many would work with them after this fiasco & would seriously harm the club further more than the tax issue imho.

Revived Red 30-10-2009 12:25

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 758519)
The Board currently including Mr. O’Neil and Ms. Lazarus know the only way forward is to work with people like Mr. Khan and Mr. Marsden and the supporters of Accrington Stanley, while we are screaming for blood they aren’t going to be to receptive.

They have made a massive balls up and they have to make it right. Healing begins with all of us working together to make sure they don’t do it again.

Good management involves skills, and the higher up the management tree one moves, the more skills are required. There are facets such as people management, money management, media management etc etc. Sadly, David O'Neill has proved that he just does not have the required skills in any of the required areas. I firmly believe that he is UNABLE "to make it right". "We" are not in a position "to make sure they don't do it again", other than by seeking their removal from a role for which they are totally unsuited.

I am especially surprised, Doug, that you include Ms Lazarus in the only way forward.

alan7554 30-10-2009 12:47

Re: Rob Heys
 
so now mr EW has jumped ship and gone to Chester City FC will he now relinquish all ties with asfc as chester city seem to be going down the pan as well,Mr EW was one of the most stubborn,ignorant,bullying and self righteous person i ever had the misfortune to work with,in every company he has owned his word was law,even in the clubhouse before and after the match the whalley factor was there,doors being slammed people being frozen out,you cant put all the blame on rob heyes who was at the end of the day just employed by Mr EW,possibly a yes man but then again when confronted with Mr EW who was,nt.As long as the past and current people are dipping their fingers into the coffers at asfc this club will continue to founder,My thanks go to jase and all the people behind the scenes who have worked their b**llocks of to raise funds for the club but at the end of the day they are all p**sing into the wind unless there is a substantial change of management at the highest level,so give Illyas Khan a chance,i have personally known him for over 25 years and at the end of the day we cant do any worse at the present time,

Doug 30-10-2009 12:48

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Revived Red (Post 758523)
Good management involves skills, and the higher up the management tree one moves, the more skills are required. There are facets such as people management, money management, media management etc etc. Sadly, David O'Neill has proved that he just does not have the required skills in any of the required areas. I firmly believe that he is UNABLE "to make it right". "We" are not in a position "to make sure they don't do it again", other than by seeking their removal from a role for which they are totally unsuited.

I am especially surprised, Doug, that you include Ms Lazarus in the only way forward.

I’m trying to make a point that they won’t go away unless it worth their while, I don’t see Mr. Khan putting money in to either pocket so we have to make change slowly and work with indifference if necessary to gain a foot hold of our own, but you are quite correct in what you say RR.

Ms Lazarus is a non persona, a faded wall flower clinging to an autumn wall thinking of what could have been.

Kiwi John 30-10-2009 16:05

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by doug (Post 758530)
ms lazarus is a non persona, a faded wall flower clinging to an autumn wall thinking of what could have been.

.......... :d :d :d

VALAIRIAN 30-10-2009 16:45

Re: Rob Heys
 
Doug, much of what you have said is to the point, but there are always two side to every story.... I think it is time that you made your way to The Crown over the coming weeks and had a little chat with some of us.... :) :) :)

shakermaker 30-10-2009 17:06

Re: Rob Heys
 
I had Mr Khan's post in mind when reading the Accrington Observer today. Reading with a different perspective you get the feeling that in quotes such as "Mr Khan's presence certainly offered weight to our argument in the courtroom" (which as first made me red in the face), Rob is reluctantly speaking on behalf of the company and therefore his boss; a boss in 'damage limitation to image and power' mode. David needs Rob, Rob needs Accrington Stanley. I don't know whether Rob would make a good chief executive as he's never really had that role (it's always been the owner of the majority of shares making the decisions) but as was said a few weeks ago, we all know he'll be around for better or worse in years to come, busting a gut for the club.

Henry Morton 31-10-2009 03:44

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by alan7554 (Post 758499)
for gods sake leave rob heys alone,he was only doing what he was told to do by the previous owner,who was apain in the arse to work for and who,s word was LAW,rob has been with asfc since the bad old days like going to horwich rmi, marine or even knowsley fc on a cold and wet wednesday night, yes he has made mistakes but it goes even further than that up to the very top of asfc,what about all these quotes from mr EW that the club is solvent and we owe nowt to the taxman, rob was employed on a need to know basis,and the former chairman is at fault for all this debt,fact the inland revenue bills were not paid when mr EW was in charge as the amount that asfc now owe to the IR now shows,Rob Heyes has done a hell of a lot for this club under a lot of pressure from the last owners to keep quiet,so give the lad abreak,would any of you lot have wanted the pressure and the job that he had,

Alan, I'm in complete agreement with you.

I'm saddened to see so many 'supporters' turning on Rob Heys at the time when he needs our friendship and understanding.

Rob has recently made some significant errors of judgement, largely I believe due to a misplaced sense of loyalty to his employers.

However, these failings pale into insignificance compared to the numerous positives which he has achieved for Accrington Stanley during the last decade.

Some people believe that "it's not how you start, it's how you finish".

Well, I'm not one of them. I believe that it's how you've lived for your friends, your family and your football club over these many years.

On that basis alone Rob Heys deserves far more respect than he is being given by some of the ignorant loudmouths on this forum . . . most of whom have never, and will never, contribute even a fraction of what Robert Heys has contributed to Accrington Stanley.

Criticise the Directors by all means.
They're there to take the flak.

But don't crucify Rob, a hard-working and decent man who must at this moment be bewildered by the bile, venom and sheer nastiness which is being directed at him.

VALAIRIAN 31-10-2009 08:09

Re: Rob Heys
 
Good post HM :)

simon 31-10-2009 09:39

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 758487)
This may well be my last post.............


Your all dreaming….Accrington Stanley Football Club by rights should have been dead years ago, it’s been punching above its weight since its conception and the only reason it’s ever managed to survive is thought the effort and pockets of the people who have funded it too date…..this includes past and present owners, directors, shareholders and those walking through the gates on a Saturday and purchasing merchandise and those who have sponsored the club over the years.

It was the loss of sponsorship that thrust us into this crisis; yes poor judgement and inaptitude played a major role in bring us to this point, but it’s the lack of funding that is the root cause.

If you clear out the existing team you will have to find someone to replace them, someone who will be willing to tip in out of their own pockets (like Rob Hays who remortgaging his Home) like O’Neil who has put money and resources in; yes they are poor judges and their objectives where out of reach but they put time in for little, if any return.

Replace them with what; ASSF/ST a bunch of ultra dedicated supporters without two stones to rub together, holding down day jobs, giving what time they can spare between family and Bed? It will never work……I have tremendous respect for those of you I know and for those I don’t who put in a lot of time to support Stanley beyond the call; but realistically, are you going to have the time needed over and above what you are doing now to run a Football Club, where are you going to get the money to pay for these Football/Business savvy replacements (who will want to go home at 5.30 and have two days off and a big salary to boot.

Will Mr. Khan want to put his business objective on hold and rush to your aid every time you have a financial crisis…..because even he will have limits to be input?

Like or not we are a poor run down east Lancashire town football club with no money and few real friends in the world of business, if we weren’t we wouldn’t be in this ****.

Accrington Stanley was built on the backs of people who grafted and put their hands in their own pockets.

Mr. O’Neil took a big chance and fell down, He Promised he would not let Accrington Stanley Fold. Well he nearly did and must recognise that time is running out and he should act with honour and find a buyer. The rest should get on with there jobs and carry on moving this club forward until such time as it can finance itself……..

In three years time the ASSF/ST can possibly take control and we can all play our part. Unless you want to put your money where your mouths are and remortgage your homes to buy the club.


BOY o BOY am I glad jack barret was not as negative and cynical as you doug.........

cashman 31-10-2009 09:55

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henry Morton (Post 758822)
Alan, I'm in complete agreement with you.

I'm saddened to see so many 'supporters' turning on Rob Heys at the time when he needs our friendship and understanding.

Rob has recently made some significant errors of judgement, largely I believe due to a misplaced sense of loyalty to his employers.

However, these failings pale into insignificance compared to the numerous positives which he has achieved for Accrington Stanley during the last decade.

Some people believe that "it's not how you start, it's how you finish".

Well, I'm not one of them. I believe that it's how you've lived for your friends, your family and your football club over these many years.

On that basis alone Rob Heys deserves far more respect than he is being given by some of the ignorant loudmouths on this forum . . . most of whom have never, and will never, contribute even a fraction of what Robert Heys has contributed to Accrington Stanley.

Criticise the Directors by all means.
They're there to take the flak.

But don't crucify Rob, a hard-working and decent man who must at this moment be bewildered by the bile, venom and sheer nastiness which is being directed at him.

well; henry, you defend rob heys very well n eloquently, but no matter what he has done in the past, this is a guy,who fer whatever reason has told untruths to people who love stanley just as much, that is beyond doubt, but you are entitled to do that. what i find strange is the man you defend would now likely be unemployed but fer the 11th hour intervention of Mr Khan n Mr Marsden, that is also beyond doubt, yet fer your own reasons you have chose not to post on the thread thanking these 2 gentlemen.:confused: seems very strange to me.:confused:

Tin Monkey 31-10-2009 10:39

Re: Rob Heys
 
If Rob Heys really is "a hard-working and decent man who must at this moment be bewildered by the bile, venom and sheer nastiness which is being directed at him", then he must be as deluded as the chairman (if that's what O' Neil actually is).

When you insist on lying day after day and even now persist with those same lies, I think anyone would accept that they were going to be severely criticised by those you have offended. This plea of 'Rob Heys is an innocent and didn't know what he was doing' is wearing very thin and is really annoying me!!!

As I said earlier in the thread, I don't want to see anyone lose their livelihood, but at least be honest about what people have done; stand up and be accountable. Blindly defending these people because they're 'friends' or whatever, is tantamount to the same blurring of the truths that the fans have been victims of for far too long. We all know that total transparency is the only way forward at this point and that goes right down to the roots of the problems.

To continue the gardening analogy, you don't get rid of weeds by pruning the tops... you have to kill the roots!!

maccawozzagod 31-10-2009 11:37

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey (Post 758873)
To continue the gardening analogy, you don't get rid of weeds by pruning the tops... you have to kill the roots!!


neither can you clean your bath water by pouring more water in. Tha's gotta pull t'plug

Doug 31-10-2009 12:45

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by simon (Post 758847)
BOY o BOY am I glad jack barret was not as negative and cynical as you doug.........

Why O Why do people insist on bringing Jack Barrett’s name in to play as a counter argument. I think that Jack Barrett will be appalled at both sides, but on balance I think he would also understand both arguments, but unlike the rest of us he wouldn’t engage himself in this mire pit.

Jack Barrett is a stalwart supporter and respected bridge builder and under appreciated bulwark of this club. His name should never have been brought into this.

I’ll skip the bull and go to the point.

I am very grateful to Mr. Khan and Mr. Marsden, we may well have lost the club but for them, However; combined they would have held around 22% of the club of which neither are a Director.

Mr. O’Neil holds an alleged 51% with the rest of the Board making up the bulk of the holding.

Net result: CONTROL.

Scream, shout, threaten, protest, withhold your money, stay away, make all the allegations people can dream up; but unless the current ownership wills or allows it any ambition for change or a supporters trust is going no where without their say so.

What I am trying to say is voice our opinion “loud and clear” and then accept the situation because I see little or no change at Accrington Stanley this or next season without us working with them.

What I think Jack Barrett would agree with is that all this “From both sides” continues to undermine confidence of the people we need most. New Blood (supporters) and Inward Investment (sponsors).

Pendle Red 31-10-2009 13:30

Re: Rob Heys
 
Doug Percentages are a game, 51% of nothing=nothing

shakermaker 31-10-2009 13:49

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 758905)
I am very grateful to Mr. Khan and Mr. Marsden, we may well have lost the club but for them

There's no 'may well' about it Doug.

Doug 31-10-2009 13:50

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 758937)
There's no 'may well' about it Doug.

It's not paid yet........

shakermaker 31-10-2009 13:57

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 758938)
It's not paid yet........

Maybe it isn't yet, but Accrington Stanley FC would've been wound up on Wednesday if it weren't for Ilyas Khan & Peter Marsden.
Even if it hasn't gone through yet, we know that it will be paid.

cashman 31-10-2009 14:03

Re: Rob Heys
 
What i find difficult to come to terms with, is those who "Defend,the Indefensible":confused:

Doug 31-10-2009 14:03

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pendle Red (Post 758931)
Doug Percentages are a game, 51% of nothing=nothing

I was talking about the ability to exert 51% of one’s will over the club PP, is this what people are wanting to take away.

Doug 31-10-2009 14:04

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 758940)
Maybe it isn't yet, but Accrington Stanley FC would've been wound up on Wednesday if it weren't for Ilyas Khan & Peter Marsden.
Even if it hasn't gone through yet, we know that it will be paid.

I don't disagree....

Stanleymad 31-10-2009 14:43

Re: Rob Heys
 
O neil on paper @ the companies house we still have to believe till otherwise that Eric has the shares albeit resigned as director! Dont sit on the fence will ya Doug.

Doug 31-10-2009 14:51

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stanleymad (Post 758958)
O neil on paper @ the companies house we still have to believe till otherwise that Eric has the shares albeit resigned as director! Dont sit on the fence will ya Doug.

O’Neil or Whalley it matters not….It’s not Khan or an ST

Don’t worry I won’t fall off……yet :D

Stanleymad 31-10-2009 14:58

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 758964)
O’Neil or Whalley it matters not….It’s not Khan or an ST

Don’t worry I won’t fall off……yet :D

Well only 2 things can happen before that can take effect .............resignation & sales of 51% before a take over can happen ??????????????

maccawozzagod 31-10-2009 15:13

Re: Rob Heys
 
O'Neil can be forced to step down as Chairman if the Board offer a vote of no confidence in him.

if he isn't a Director (and he isn't) then he will be forced to be either a shareholder or not and the truth will out.

simon 31-10-2009 16:28

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 758487)
This may well be my last post.............

You had me excited for a while.....

DAV007 31-10-2009 16:41

Re: Rob Heys
 
Robert Heys is part of the problem. OUT!

yerself 31-10-2009 17:28

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug
I’ll skip the bull and go to the point.

Are you not feeling well?:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug
Why O Why do people insist on bringing Jack Barrett’s name in to play

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug
What I think Jack Barrett would agree with


Doug 31-10-2009 17:52

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by simon (Post 758993)
You had me excited for a while.....

Sorry I haven’t accommodated you Simon; I never been one for being a sheep and the beauty of a forum is you get the opportunity to express an alternative view. I’m not trying to be clever or controversial.

Chimer 31-10-2009 17:55

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DAV007 (Post 758997)
Robert Heys is part of the problem. OUT!

Yes, you've told us once or twice before that's what you think.

ffs.... :)

DAV007 31-10-2009 18:32

Re: Rob Heys
 
I am still ENRAGED that Heys and Oneill went to court with no more than a plea. If it was left to those 2 we would not have a football club today.

Henry Morton 31-10-2009 22:26

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 758854)
. . . what i find strange is the man you defend would now likely be unemployed but fer the 11th hour intervention of Mr Khan n Mr Marsden, that is also beyond doubt, yet fer your own reasons you have chose not to post on the thread thanking these 2 gentlemen.:confused: seems very strange to me.:confused:

Hello cashman,

It's because this thread is entitled "Rob Heys".

That's why I posted on it.

Are you qualified to tell me where else I have to post?

cashman 31-10-2009 22:54

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henry Morton (Post 759108)
Hello cashman,

It's because this thread is entitled "Rob Heys".

That's why I posted on it.

Are you qualified to tell me where else I have to post?

no i am not telling you were to post, nor am i qualified to do so, am just remarking i found it strange, ya don't have to like it but i said it, tough.:dummy2:

Henry Morton 31-10-2009 22:58

Re: Rob Heys
 
Keep digging

cashman 01-11-2009 08:54

Re: Rob Heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henry Morton (Post 759115)
Keep digging

Oh i will.:D


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:32.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com