Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

Kenny Arthur has been transfer listed and Kallum Higginbotham has been released.
Rochdale | News | Latest News | Latest News | Retained List

Do we make a bid to bring back King Kenny and lure Kallum to the Crown?

I think both would be good but I'm unsure Arthur would be like Sol Campbell going back to Arsenal...

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

never heard so much crap in me life, don't know anyone that would not love kennys return,:rolleyes:

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

How how how how how how how how how how how how how?

Please, describe one way in which that simile works, aside from a player returning to a former club.

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

From a personal point of view, I would like to see both Kallum and Kenny back at the Crown next season, but woul Kenny return and could we afford him? Kallum on the other hand will be looking for a new club and he played well against Stanley at the Crown and was good when loaned to us by Rochdale. Bring him in please (cover in case Michael Symes moves on, as seems likely).

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

:) I'm with you cashy mate,Would love to have KING ARTHUR back at the crown next season kallum too:)

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

it's just wages though!! he oviously left as he thought the grass was greener and it wasn't!! i'd have him back and kallum!

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

To be honest if he does come back I think it should be playing as he fif against us, in a deeper role rather than up front, his distribution tore us apart.

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

Would love to see Kenny back lets hope he returns

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

Are you mad? :eek:

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

interesting way of ensuring replies to the thread!!!


Kenny deffffffffffffoooooooooo, Goalkeeper has been a problem position for us ever since Spearo stoppe dbeing our regular number 1, the only gap in being a problem was when Kenny was here. I said at the start of the season that we would have go tin the play offs if Kenny had stayed and I stand by that now. The only slight problem as far as Kenny is concerned is that he seems to suffer a serious (ish) injury every year.


Higginarse would be another quality acquisition and one that would gain us some money down the line in a transfer fee. Many Daleys were bemused by the lack of opportunities he got (Turner?), and I be that their forum is up in arms. The only problem as far as he is concerned is that we already have Miles and Turner for that position and regularly play a centre midfielder (Ryan, Proctor or Joyce) in that position. I would imagine that all five of those will be offered new deals or already have one, Joyce being the only possible doubt.

I wouldn't break the bank for either but Kenny would be the priority and I believe he left us for little more than he was on.

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

Higginbotham demolished us when he came on, he would be a brilliant acquisition. ya need players like this to push for playoffs. young, competitive and quality

Sign him up JC

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

higginbotham upfront on 2 years plus king in goals on 3 years plus symes on 3 years

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

The word caution springs to mind with Kenny Arthur as he is transfer listed which I would think put's him out of our reach.

I was not overly impressed with Kallum in either of his loan spells with Stanley, he was however has others have said instrumental in the demolition job that Dale did on Accy at the Crown Ground this season.

But he only made six starts for Dale last season with twenty three appearances from the bench.

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

fantastic goal Kallum scored when he came to Acc this season but didnt impress me when on loan spell here. A bit lightweight. Obviously Rochdale felt the same or he would not be on the transfer list. But Kenny has proved irreplacable.

Re: Rochdale (Rejects?)
 

just look at symes when he came 1st he was look at him now hes holding the club up for more £'s or league 1 so i would give the lad a good trade syems for king as wel before june 1