![]() |
Re: Wycombe Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Wycombe Thread
How come REDASH dosen't post the highlights on here anymore- is there some sort of law against it now ?
|
Re: Wycombe Thread
think its summat to do with copyright????stanleymad will be able to tell you in more detail
|
Re: Wycombe Thread
Just go online to BBC Sport or Sky Sports, they are usually online after 48 hours
|
Re: Wycombe Thread
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Wycombe Thread
Hi all
My first chance to give you a few thoughts on yesterday's game (I hope you enjoyed Callum's company - I thought he did a cracking job) Stanley probably weren't as all round dominant as they were at Rotherham oddly, but scored when they needed to. More importantly though the defending was superb and but for one mistake for Phil Edwards it would have been an all too rare clean sheet. And on the subject of Mr. Edwards, what a little beauty of a winner. Credit to the excellent Charlie Barnett too for the delivery and an honourable mention to Sean Hessey who had a terrific game at centre half. Some thoughts from Phil here: ASFC News Story > 3876 Ta Dan |
Re: Wycombe Thread
Anybody else think that this Wycombe report is in bad taste.
- Blues go down in battle of the Somme 1st July 1916 - 584 Accrington Pals killed, wounded or missing. |
Re: Wycombe Thread
Good honest summary,from a good honest player.:)
|
Re: Wycombe Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Wycombe Thread
Quote:
Actually quite a good report I thought :) |
Re: Wycombe Thread
Quote:
So why is it when somebody mentions mud I think of female wrestling then ? :D |
Re: Wycombe Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Wycombe Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Wycombe Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Wycombe Thread
Quote:
He was sorry if it caused offence. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:53. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com