Accrington Web - Reaction from Martin Allen

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)

- Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)

- - Reaction from Martin Allen (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/reaction-from-martin-allen-62932.html)

Reaction from Martin Allen

Mad Dog gives his take on the game

MAD DOG: IT WAS GOOD POINT FOR US WITH TEN MEN

Re: Reaction from Martin Allen

Martin Allen thought that for 70 minutes the Stanley "weren't really in it" and wasn't sure about the sending off

“I thought for seventy minutes they weren’t really in it. We were more than comfortable and they weren’t getting anywhere near our goal, although had some possession but weren’t really threatening it.”

“They may have had ten minutes in the second-half where they did look like they were going to score but we re-grouped and re-organised and near the end it looked more like we were going to score.”

Anybody need to read any more?

They were a good side. We better than matched them all through. Respect to them ..........but little respect to us from them ..................

Re: Reaction from Martin Allen

Allen is obviously a biased arrogant big head n not worth considering.:rolleyes:

Re: Reaction from Martin Allen

Quote:

Originally Posted by Div3North (Post 1029349)

Respect to them ..........but little respect to us from them ..................

But isn't that always the case!

I'm past caring about it, though it does make beating those 'bigger' teams all the more enjoyable :D