Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Rob heys (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/rob-heys-64707.html)

DtheP47 21-08-2013 01:32

Re: Rob heys
 
The Rules are here:

FA ban Accrington managing director Robert Heys for betting offences | Mail Online

Simple

caretaker 21-08-2013 08:47

Re: Rob heys
 
It is obvious that Mr. Lowe is yesterdays man regarding Accrington Stanley FC. It is unfortunate, but lets now move on and appoint someone with a little bit more nous. The club is bigger than any one manager/player, hopefully

lancsdave 21-08-2013 09:07

Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by caretaker (Post 1072288)
It is obvious that Mr. Lowe is yesterdays man regarding Accrington Stanley FC. It is unfortunate, but lets now move on and appoint someone with a little bit more nous. The club is bigger than any one manager/player, hopefully

I think this may be a case of mistaken identity

ianray 21-08-2013 09:15

Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DAV007 (Post 1072233)
It doesn't mater where they live, we live in the 21st century with good communication systems, decisions can be made, relayed, etc.

My friend runs a business in Australia, he lives in the UK.
It works fine - he has 2 daily conference calls with his core staff.

No reason why Stanley should be any different, if anything it should be easier .

your reply is your opinion just like my post was my THOUGHTS only, i may be wrong. But of course you WON'T BE .......

Chimer 21-08-2013 09:34

Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DtheP47 (Post 1072279)

Simple maybe - but incredible in their scope.

I suspect hundreds of club players, officials and staff will have unknowingly breached the rules last year on Cup Final day alone.

If someone had told me a fortnight ago that someone who works in a club's shop couldn't have a bet on the Cup Final I simply wouldn't have believed it.

Games involving your own club or if you are in some way able to influence the result - OK. The rest - mad.

Doesn't excuse Rob. at least not once he had real responsibilities at Stanley, but for me at least goes some way to explain.

cashman 21-08-2013 10:08

Re: Rob heys
 
Please explain how it goes someway to explain???:confused: He was M.D. n before that held a high profile position, Someone in a club shop i wouldn't expect to be aware, but come on this to me is just n excuse.:eek:

loweiy 21-08-2013 10:18

Re: Rob heys
 
I do hope so Lancsdave !!!!!!!!!!

DAV007 21-08-2013 15:52

Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianray (Post 1072291)
your reply is your opinion just like my post was my THOUGHTS only, i may be wrong. But of course you WON'T BE .......

Correct.

ianray 21-08-2013 17:04

Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DAV007 (Post 1072333)
Correct.

That says it all

DAV007 21-08-2013 17:14

Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianray (Post 1072340)
That says it all

Paranoia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

jaysay 21-08-2013 17:17

Re: Rob heys
 
It appears there are some people who can't grasp the reality of the fact that, whatever excuses are put forward, Mr. Heys position is untenable, no matter how long any ban is, as far as Accrington Stanley are concerned Rob Heys days should be over, period.

shadsworthcloud 21-08-2013 17:33

Re: Rob heys
 
On the contrary, jaysay. I think everybody on here accepts it.

Some people are (seem) more happy about it than others and some have suggested some clemency but I haven't seen any posts to say Rob should be acquitted.

Greger 21-08-2013 18:03

Re: Rob heys
 
Nice Bloke,
Looked liked a decent chief exec to me from afar, but this is so incredibly stupid!:(
Harsh sentence? Wouldn't have thought so if it had been someone else.

jaysay 21-08-2013 18:08

Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shadsworthcloud (Post 1072348)
On the contrary, jaysay. I think everybody on here accepts it.

Some people are (seem) more happy about it than others and some have suggested some clemency but I haven't seen any posts to say Rob should be acquitted.

I never said there were people saying he should be acquitted, just that after his 21 months are up there are intimations that he still might have a future with Stanley :eek:

ianray 21-08-2013 18:25

Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DAV007 (Post 1072342)

Sorry to hear you suffer from PARANOIA . please DON'T contact me again .


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:07.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com