Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Bury Match Thread (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/bury-match-thread-66477.html)

smudgie 28-08-2014 09:38

Bury Match Thread
 
Looks a massive test this one!

cashman 28-08-2014 09:41

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Its a big un, have a fancy we will get summat from it though.:)

Div3North 28-08-2014 10:03

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Realistically, you have to think that a point out of this would be a decent result ........Then we can go on and do it unto Tranmere the week after

:p

smudgie 28-08-2014 11:40

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
I will always take an away point!

DAV007 28-08-2014 11:45

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Suprised to see Ryan Lowe down in league 2, always rated him

Alvin the chipmunk 28-08-2014 12:38

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DAV007 (Post 1114935)
Suprised to see Ryan Lowe down in league 2, always rated him

A decent player.....there for the £££ apparently. They're spending big this year and with gates of 3500 one wonders if it will end in tears. A massive test no doubt.

I'd take a point. I would expect the QPR keeper to debut unfortunately for Mr Lynch.

Outback Ozzy 30-08-2014 06:48

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Being that we now have 3 keepers available, I personally would stick with Lynch. The kid from QPR seems a little stringy from what I saw of him at the Luton match, but there again if QPR rate him, then he cannot be all bad.personally, I think Lynch should be offered an extension to his contract and let the QPR keeper return. We have 2 decent keepers plus one in reserve, albeit injured at the moment. As for today's match, I cannot see us getting anything from it, but, a point or more would be welcome!

Chubbyman 30-08-2014 06:55

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Outback Ozzy (Post 1115078)
Being that we now have 3 keepers available, I personally would stick with Lynch. The kid from QPR seems a little stringy from what I saw of him at the Luton match, but there again if QPR rate him, then he cannot be all bad.personally, I think Lynch should be offered an extension to his contract and let the QPR keeper return. We have 2 decent keepers plus one in reserve, albeit injured at the moment. As for today's match, I cannot see us getting anything from it, but, a point or more would be welcome!




Why send a keeper back untried....He could be another Bettenelli,plus you don't know what the loan deal is ....remember Richardson...free if we played him...£750 a week if we didn't.

VALAIRIAN 30-08-2014 06:56

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Outback Ozzy (Post 1115078)
Being that we now have 3 keepers available, I personally would stick with Lynch. The kid from QPR seems a little stringy from what I saw of him at the Luton match, but there again if QPR rate him, then he cannot be all bad.personally, I think Lynch should be offered an extension to his contract and let the QPR keeper return. We have 2 decent keepers plus one in reserve, albeit injured at the moment. As for today's match, I cannot see us getting anything from it, but, a point or more would be welcome!

Ha ha OO, when I read the first line, I thought you were going to say play all 3.... :D :D

Agree, a point will be good :)

AccyMad 30-08-2014 09:10

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Bit of good news for us, according to bbc Nardiello is out injured - of course I feel sorry for the lad but we need all the luck we can get today

football19 30-08-2014 11:39

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Need to stay tight and compact and not open the game up too early.
Don't give Lowe any time or space.
They have a couple of quick lads out wide,so our wide men need to double up.
Don't lose concentration and we may get something KTF

VALAIRIAN 30-08-2014 13:32

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Starting XI...


26. Joe Lumley

2. Adam Buxton
5. Tom
25. Rob Atkinson
28. Mustoe

11. Kal
4. Luke Joyce
16. Nicky Hunt
15. Piero

10. Will

9. James Gray

:)

VALAIRIAN 30-08-2014 13:35

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Subs....

Subs
6. Deano
7. Shay McCartan
8. Windass
14. Marcus
19. Lynch
44. Bowerman
27. Max Hazeldine

:)

smudgie 30-08-2014 14:52

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
1-1 HT.

Sounds like we are playing quite well according to twitter.................

Naismith with the goal..... I knew it !

smudgie 30-08-2014 14:52

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chubbyman (Post 1115079)
Why send a keeper back untried....He could be another Bettenelli,plus you don't know what the loan deal is ....remember Richardson...free if we played him...£750 a week if we didn't.


Where you hear that Chubbyman???

cashman 30-08-2014 16:58

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Our best display this season imho, shame about the result, Hit the post/crossbar corner wi a great naismith free kick,his best display by a country mile this season, one headed off the line, 2 cast iron penalties denied, Bury should have had the dirty pig number 27 sent off first half no question,was only booked n 2 mins later shoulda been booked again,fer a touchline foul, still used to this wi us.:rolleyes:

Redraine 30-08-2014 17:03

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
How did Nicky Hunt do, Cashy? Is the formation worth persevering with or would it be better for him and Buxton to swap positions, seeing as it sounded like Rhino was skinned for one of their goals.

cashman 30-08-2014 17:12

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Nicky was subbed second half, as far as i'm concerned will NEVER make a midfielder. But Joycey i would have subbed fer a Bury Black Pudding he was very poor,imho.

football19 30-08-2014 17:19

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Bury came out in all white and thought they were Real Madrid.
They played three at the back and played little triangles in impossible areas.
I really thought after twenty minutes we would get something as playing with a back three there is spaces out wide and Naismith and mingolas eyes must have lit up ( both had good games)
The new keeper played well and grey up top also.
Now the negatives, our fullbacks can't defend (good players) and this will cost us as it did again today.
I watched closely and both were on fire to get forward ( no need as naismiths on fire),when possession is turned over they are out of position.
I think toms first five touches were in the right back channel,and there equaliser was rob being dragged into the left channel.
We will never get clean sheets if this is not addressed,saying that Buxton once again got rinsed for the winner,just as he did against Luton .
I haven't got anything against attacking fullbacks but how many assists have we had by this ?
We haven't the players to score two+ goals to win games!let's get back to basics !!!

pud 30-08-2014 18:17

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
I am struggling to see how we have won that (as a Bury Fan) apart from two bits of skill from Lowe with the back heal for the first and Mayor with a wonder goal (poor defending though)

Stanley will be nowhere near the bottom of the league if they play like that each week! Very impressed with you lot.

The Ref was awful for both teams!

Not sure about two pens! and I think if a player has got a card for an off the ball incident it should have been red rather than yellow that Atkinson got.(although maybe this is a bit of payback seeing as Stanley usually have someone sent off at Gigg)

Naismith was impressive as he was in pre season against blackburn (I came to watch as I live in Accy)

Good luck for the rest of the season (apart from when we meet again)

andyd 31-08-2014 07:11

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by football19 (Post 1115143)
Bury came out in all white and thought they were Real Madrid.
They played three at the back and played little triangles in impossible areas.
I really thought after twenty minutes we would get something as playing with a back three there is spaces out wide and Naismith and mingolas eyes must have lit up ( both had good games)
The new keeper played well and grey up top also.
Now the negatives, our fullbacks can't defend (good players) and this will cost us as it did again today.
I watched closely and both were on fire to get forward ( no need as naismiths on fire),when possession is turned over they are out of position.
I think toms first five touches were in the right back channel,and there equaliser was rob being dragged into the left channel.
We will never get clean sheets if this is not addressed,saying that Buxton once again got rinsed for the winner,just as he did against Luton .
I haven't got anything against attacking fullbacks but how many assists have we had by this ?
We haven't the players to score two+ goals to win games!let's get back to basics !!!

Have to agree about Buxton + Mustoe woefully lacking pace defensivley that,s why I think JB tried 3 at the back will be punished against good sides thought Bury were poor having spent so much I think our blg problem is finishing sides off should have been 3-1 at least half time Gray really should have scored.

Redraine 31-08-2014 09:13

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by football19 (Post 1115143)
Bury came out in all white and thought they were Real Madrid.
They played three at the back and played little triangles in impossible areas.
I really thought after twenty minutes we would get something as playing with a back three there is spaces out wide and Naismith and mingolas eyes must have lit up ( both had good games)
The new keeper played well and grey up top also.
Now the negatives, our fullbacks can't defend (good players) and this will cost us as it did again today.
I watched closely and both were on fire to get forward ( no need as naismiths on fire),when possession is turned over they are out of position.
I think toms first five touches were in the right back channel,and there equaliser was rob being dragged into the left channel.
We will never get clean sheets if this is not addressed,saying that Buxton once again got rinsed for the winner,just as he did against Luton .
I haven't got anything against attacking fullbacks but how many assists have we had by this ?
We haven't the players to score two+ goals to win games!let's get back to basics !!!

Good post! How about Hunt and Buxton swopping positions and picking Lids, who can tackle and has some pace,at left back when fit. Would that help to solve it?

AccyMad 31-08-2014 10:00

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Agree with others that this was definitely our best performance so far this season - Kal, for whatever reason raised his game & really showed what he can do when his head's in the right place.
Bury, to say the amount of money they've spent didn't look all that & although they were much better in 2nd half I still can't figure out how we got nothing from the game.
Was also puzzled as to why the ref didn't add any time at all for all the treatment needed on Rose's 'injury' in added time but glad the lad had a miraculous recovery as soon as the whistle was blown :rolleyes:

football19 31-08-2014 10:10

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Redraine (Post 1115197)
Good post! How about Hunt and Buxton swopping positions and picking Lids, who can tackle and has some pace,at left back when fit. Would that help to solve it?

It's a difficult one Redraine,hunty and lids are defenders who can join in,were I think Mustoe and Buxton are offensive players who aren't as effective defending.
Both have a place in football but for me at Accrington,we need a platform of clean sheets to build on.
I think only fitness will stop Buxton playing in midfield as he struggles to get back we out of position,and in midfield there's no resting.
Back to bury game,there Three at the back and centre mid were the worst I have seen this season and they played better when they went down to ten men and a back four --- just like us !

cashman 31-08-2014 10:11

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AccyMad (Post 1115202)
Agree with others that this was definitely our best performance so far this season - Kal, for whatever reason raised his game & really showed what he can do when his head's in the right place.
Bury, to say the amount of money they've spent didn't look all that & although they were much better in 2nd half I still can't figure out how we got nothing from the game.
Was also puzzled as to why the ref didn't add any time at all for all the treatment needed on Rose's 'injury' in added time but glad the lad had a miraculous recovery as soon as the whistle was blown :rolleyes:

Kal in my view could play at higher level. i'm sure, if someone could just get his head right, He wasn't on Rangers books cos he had no potential.? If such a person could be found it would be an big benefit to the lad and Stanley. As to why the ref added no time on, i agree wi pud, he was (another) complete knob fer both sides.

football19 31-08-2014 10:38

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Cashy,I think Kai's performance/goal in the first half was more to do with putting on a show for a team that's made a bid for him !
He wasn't as effective in the second half when they made their subs and altered their shape,but would image did enough for an improved offer from bury !!.

cashman 31-08-2014 11:45

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by football19 (Post 1115213)
Cashy,I think Kai's performance/goal in the first half was more to do with putting on a show for a team that's made a bid for him !

Have to disagree mate, have seen him play superb pre season,also last season,its consistency he lacks fer me, sod all else.:)

Redraine 31-08-2014 12:25

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Jb's post match interview gave me the impression he was resigned to losing Kal. What a sickener for him, as didn't he put up his own funds in order to bring him in?

football19 31-08-2014 12:46

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1115222)
Have to disagree mate, have seen him play superb pre season,also last season,its consistency he lacks fer me, sod all else.:)

Didn't say hes not got ability,what i meant was he hasn't set the world on fire in the first four games (go subbed and benched),so it was a good time for him to put a performance in to remind a club that wants to double his money and sign him !!.
He reminds me so much of John Miles ! :)

cashman 31-08-2014 13:08

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Aye but unless hes totally dumb, he can do much better n Bury (no disrespect to em) in my view.:)

Exile on Spencer St 31-08-2014 13:59

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Redraine (Post 1115224)
Jb's post match interview gave me the impression he was resigned to losing Kal. What a sickener for him, as didn't he put up his own funds in order to bring him in?

Yes, Red, that's what gleaned from the aside from Mr.Beattie about what's in the club's best interest.
For that reason, I also tend to agree with F19 about Mr.Naismith's possible motivation for this first half performance (which I didn't see, but can believe it was good if Cashy thought so).
I hope I'm wrong on both counts and that Kal continues to bag a.....er,....bagful of goals for Stanley.

football19 31-08-2014 14:50

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1115227)
Aye but unless hes totally dumb, he can do much better n Bury (no disrespect to em) in my view.:)

My only concern Cashy is the bigger the club the bigger the expectations and he seems a confidence player who would struggle to deal with it.

Mr T 31-08-2014 15:57

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Redraine (Post 1115224)
Jb's post match interview gave me the impression he was resigned to losing Kal. What a sickener for him, as didn't he put up his own funds in order to bring him in?


One word "no"

Kal was a free agent when he joined us and no fee was paid for his services.

The last fee ASFC paid was for Sean Mc and please no more posts on that one!!

shakermaker 31-08-2014 16:21

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
The fee was to the taxman to lift our transfer embargo. While it was paid in order to get the transfer of Naismith completed, we would have had to pay it anyway.

For what it's worth I don't think we should be rejecting financial offers for players that have to be carried through most matches. In our position, application of talent is required for 90 minutes, not just when you're in the mood.

FrankMoody 31-08-2014 17:47

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
I'd sell Naismith tomorrow if it meant we could get an experienced lg 2 centre midfield player and a target man in. It was nailed on he was going to perform yesterday in front of his potential new suitors.

There's 1000s of players at all levels of the game who could be fantastic if their attitude was right - they are the players that get managers the sack because they always get a 2nd chance because they could be match-winners, but rarely are.

Buxton and mustoe's distribution is awful.

Need to get Winnard and liddle back in the team, Hunt to right back and desperately need a c mid, another forward and a keeper

football19 31-08-2014 18:05

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Got to agree about Lids frank,good defender and has been very unlucky

cashman 31-08-2014 18:10

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Lids is injured, must be somewhere near fit now? been missed imho.

Exile on Spencer St 31-08-2014 18:24

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by FrankMoody (Post 1115251)
I'd sell Naismith tomorrow if it meant we could get an experienced lg 2 centre midfield player and a target man in.

Problem is that I doubt if you could buy a new floodlight, never mind a good midfielder and striker (both like gold dust in League2) with what Bury allegedly offered.
I agree about selling, but not about giving away a potential match winner at a discount.
Also agree will be glad when Mr.Liddle is back to fitness and offers a defensive option.

shakermaker 01-09-2014 07:14

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Lids has also shown in the past that he can play the ball-winning role in midfield. He won't win many headers but, unlike Hunty, is young and versatile enough to learn positional sense.

football19 01-09-2014 08:57

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Cant believe i missed that Shaker !!.
Didn't Lids play CB for Cooky when injuries kicked in?,so playing centrally would be a problem.

pud 01-09-2014 09:55

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Rumours at our end that Proctor + Cash for Naismith. I am unsure if we need him but I think Proccy has no future at Bury and Flickers has already said Stanley had been enquiring about him (nothing set in concrete)

cashman 01-09-2014 12:32

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Fail to see how Proccy can be Match Fit? aint played fer months as far as i know?:confused:

football19 01-09-2014 12:45

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1115329)
Fail to see how Proccy can be Match Fit? aint played fer months as far as i know?:confused:

He wont be match fit Cashy,but sources tel me he was top of Burys fitness tests pre-season,so i would t think it would be a problem,he was always one of the fittest at Acci

football19 01-09-2014 12:47

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by football19 (Post 1115320)
Cant believe i missed that Shaker !!.
Didn't Lids play CB for Cooky when injuries kicked in?,so playing centrally would be a problem.

should have posted "wouldn't be a problem" !

Alvin the chipmunk 01-09-2014 12:48

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Proccy coming back if nothing else would certainly give a feelgood factor back to the terrace. And at least he'd bother to clap the travelling supporters unlike certain people....

cashman 01-09-2014 13:13

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alvin the chipmunk (Post 1115332)
Proccy coming back if nothing else would certainly give a feelgood factor back to the terrace. And at least he'd bother to clap the travelling supporters unlike certain people....

Its looking a possibilty to me, going off what J.B.s just said on fishy.:eek:

AsFc62 01-09-2014 14:22

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
crying out for a player like Proccy!!!

cashman 01-09-2014 14:36

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsFc62 (Post 1115351)
crying out for a player like Proccy!!!

Thats a racing cert we need one like that.:)

AccyMad 01-09-2014 15:32

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1115355)
Thats a racing cert we need one like that.:)

That'll high praise coming from someone who's said previously he's not Proccy's biggest fan

cashman 01-09-2014 16:51

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AccyMad (Post 1115364)
That'll high praise coming from someone who's said previously he's not Proccy's biggest fan

I aint but realise we need a bit of steel n proccys got it by the bucketload.;)

sherry 01-09-2014 18:10

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
The bucketload has landed :D

yonmon 01-09-2014 19:16

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by football19 (Post 1115226)
Didn't say hes not got ability,what i meant was he hasn't set the world on fire in the first four games (go subbed and benched),so it was a good time for him to put a performance in to remind a club that wants to double his money and sign him !!.
He reminds me so much of John Miles ! :)

But John Miles was a better singer !!!.

smobile 02-09-2014 06:53

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yonmon (Post 1115414)
But John Miles was a better singer !!!.

Miles Better ;)

Div3North 02-09-2014 12:53

Re: Bury Match Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by smobile (Post 1115460)
Miles Better ;)

This post has been nominated for Appalling Joke of the Week :o

It will almost certainly win! :p

:D:D:D:D:D


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com