![]() |
Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Surely with some better advertising and perhaps a gamble at £5 a ticket....the Clayton End could have created a 12th man tonight and helped Stanley on to the 2nd round of the JPT???
|
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Quote:
I don't think it would improve the atmosphere that much either as the Clayton End seems to be a lot quieter now than in previous seasons fior whatever reason. |
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Because of the clubs continued approach to burying it's head in the sand on such issues as over zealous stewarding and strict interpretation of rules.
Don't let anyone be fooled, there is one reason for the decline in the Clayton End and that reason is the club. As for the tin pot trophy, it has had little to no publicity due to the football deadline day and has been in decline for years. The FA should do the honourable thing and kill it. |
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Quote:
|
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Quote:
|
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
I was really shocked with that attendance. I wanted to go but ran out of money defiantly on Saturday.
|
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Dav007
Quick question; why would the FA want to "kill off" a FL competition?? Plus the finalists get a trip to Wembley plus around £250k in sponsorship + gate recepits. |
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Don't expect a quick answer.:rolleyes:
|
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
In reality Stanley's gate probably holds up well in this competition. I bet if you took the time to look at all the others, the majority would be below 50% of the normal 'league' home gate.
|
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Quote:
So the Preston faithful was down by around 70% on the night despite those attractive price cuts . |
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
The FA should either back the tin pot trophy and increase its exposure, maybe give the tv rights to a terrestrial broadcaster, increase prize money, subsidise entrance fees, etc
Or They should kill it as at the moment most teams use it to give their reserves a run out until the late rounds. Personally, they should kill it. It is a joke trophy, embarrassing seeing Wembley 1/4 full in March for the final, and most football fans never mind the general public couldn't tell you who recently won it, when the final was played, etc. It's a reserve team cup. |
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Without looking it up, Davo, can you tell me who won the FA cup for the last five seasons? I've no idea, but that doesn't diminish it's importance.
It is the fact that the FA are desparate to recoup any amount of money to help offset the debts of Wembley that the play-off finals, and the Paint Pot and other competitions are played there. Obviously a good league ground, preferbaly not in London, would better suit most lower league teams and fans, but getting to Wembley, however empty it may be to an accountant, is still an ambition to cherish. |
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
DAV007,
I ask again; what is the Football League Trophy (sponsored by Johnstones Paint) to do with the Football Assocation?? All the things you go on about at Football League initiatives; some games are televised; there is prize money and there is a maximum price in place, there is a rule on team strength. Yet you want the FA to kill a FL competition!!! Even Sepp Blatter isn't that power mad!!!;) |
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Dav, why would Accrington Stanley want to back an idea that scraps the competition that provides us with the most realistic chance of winning some silverware in any given season?
Talk to fans of Wrexham, Grimsby, Macclesfield, Bristol Rovers, etc and they'd bite your hand off for being able to compete in the JPT |
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
No they wouldnt.
|
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Quote:
Playing in the JPT last night means that your club is in League 1 or 2. Fans of Grimsby etc would gladly swap their Conference status for Football League status. Or then again, maybe they wouldn't! |
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Quote:
List of Football League Trophy winners - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Last time I went to a final in this competition it was the Sherpa Van final and only 80000 fans bothered to go. I wouldn't care if Wembley only opened one section for us, if it was the chance to see Stanley at Wembley I, and probably many others would be there like a shot happilly paying the ridiculous amount they charge. Some teams might not have many fans but the chance to watch them at Wembley is special and rare unless you're a Carlisle or Stevenage fan due to mickey mouse competitions :D |
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Well Wembley was less than half full tonight fer n England match, so 1/4 full fer one of these finals is pretty good,using that yardstick.;)
|
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Quote:
|
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Quote:
|
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Quote:
|
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Quote:
You where explicitly talking about the JPT, not league status, so my point remains valid. |
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Would imagine most small clubs welcome the paint pot n stuff, due to the fact no-ones got reserve sides these days, its a good chance to give people a run out in match conditions?
|
Re: Paint pot Attendance: 818 (with 282 from cufc)
Agree with Dav007, it's a pointless competition which stretches the footballing resources of a club as small as ours. Unless it's given decent exposure , hyped up a bit and took more seriously then I see no point. Players and most fans in England really don't have much enthusiasm towards this cup. This used to be the same with the league cup but the fact it's exposure on tv is now massive and big clubs are in the pot there is more insentive for players and fans alike! 2 cups for a first team squad is enough with including the football league for a club like us.
Everyone has an opinion but I see it pointless and an unnecessary expense for a lot of fans. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com