Jay Lynch
 

Released "by mutual consent" ........... after his one and only home game ( v Luton Town ) why do I have the feeling that this is a mistake ?

Re: Jay Lynch
 

No more a mistake if, as is alleged, players start moaning on twitter about team selection. Twitter is for twits and, if true, Mr.Lynch proved himself one.

Re: Jay Lynch
 

I tried twitter fer a short while,decided it was full of knobheads n abandoned it, seems i was correct.

Re: Jay Lynch
 

Should be made illegal, Facebook too for that matter! In fact all social media, then people can get back to having real conversations and real friends, instead of paedophiles in disguise.

Re: Jay Lynch
 

Slating social media in messageboard posts. Love the irony fellas :laugh8:.

Re: Jay Lynch
 

Ha Ha! I also think a bloke with a red flag should walk in front of every car to warn pedestrians, as in the good old days.
What's that you clued up youngsters say - whoosh?

Re: Jay Lynch
 

I believe that qualifies good sir.

Just had a look at Lynch's profile... seems like an angry young man!

Re: Jay Lynch
 

you may want to take that back, look at the comments in the sky sports article

It would appear Lynch was desperate to stay and play, to the point he would do it for free

Beattie future uncertain | Football News | Sky Sports

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport...topper/?ref=mr

and he is now at Salford
http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/salfor...s-1286716.html

Re: Jay Lynch
 

Still highly unprofessional, almost childlike, spouting comments like that publicly. Will do well to get a league club to sign him with that attitude. Keepers of his ilk are ten a penny.

Re: Jay Lynch
 

No it's not, he is telling the truth.
What is wrong with telling the truth?

Re: Jay Lynch
 

Professionals in any walk of life know better than to bad mouth previous employers, even if the parting was bitter. What's more, how do you know that's the whole truth without input from the club? Don't be so naive.

Re: Jay Lynch
 

How do we know he is bad mouthing? Which part of his comments is bad mouthing?

If he is telling a lie, the club could easily approach the Bolton press to have the article removed.

Why do some of our fans blindly take the club side? The same silly mentality a few years ago, made me despair from the sidelines while some of you campaigned to raise funds for the D'ON instead of asking questions and finding out the truth.
When I tried to ask the questions on this forum, a lot of you shouted me down or buried your head.

This is just another example.

Keep burying your head in the sand, it never rains in Accy!

Re: Jay Lynch
 

You continue beating your drum if it makes a nice sound to you. Some football 'fans' are never happy unless they're working to expose the great evils that are the bosses in the game... sad, really. More often than not the realities of football clubs are just like other businesses where difficult decisions have to be made and some people get upset. If you think Lynch's behaviour is acceptable of a player looking for a professional contract, I'm afraid we'll have to agree to disagree.

Re: Jay Lynch
 

Go and have a lie down, Davo, your paranoia is starting to show.

Re: Jay Lynch
 

Please explain where I have sought to expose a 'great evil' or where I stated Stanley have acted incorrectly?

We have not been told what Lynchs 'behaviour' was that would be unacceptable?

Lynch has provided a independent news paper with his version of events, Stanley have not challenged them nor provided an alternative story.

Shakermaker, stop burying your head in the sand.

Re: Jay Lynch
 

Possibly because, unlike some of us on here, the club have much more important things to with their time and have moved on.

Re: Jay Lynch
 

Thank you for proving my point

Re: Jay Lynch
 

Dav he had to be let go....simple economics. Stanley had four keepers, even if he played for free there's all the invisible expenses and insurances.It would seem Stanley may have to play Joe Lumley as long as he's not injured or if not have to pay a percentage of his salary as has happened with loan players in the past,just a hunch,maybe Mr T could enlighten us if he's allowed to.

Re: Jay Lynch
 

That's fine, but it would appear Mr.Lynch was told one thing by the club but the club acted differently.

Also, whose fault cease it forcgivong the young lad an opportunity and a bit of hope without fully analysing the finances?

I can understand why the lad feels hard done by, likewise I would rather the club was financially sound instead of having a wage budget it can't afford.

Fans having a pop at Lynch are out of order.

Re: Jay Lynch
 

:rolleyes:

No, you're right. This revolutionary must be halted. The club must put an end to the gigantic damage that this front page exclusive will do. The world must know the truth, otherwise what will become of Accrington Stanley? The population would be led to believe that a player released from a club before earning a contract was miffed! Quick, get Dan on the case - this requires our one media resource's full attention. I don't see any other possible solution.

:eek:

Re: Jay Lynch
 

I think i'm right in saying he arrived before the Lumley deal was completed,or perhaps fully sanctioned(as a stand in keeper until Dawber was fully fit).After Lumley arrived he'd be 3rd choice at best,a luxury Stanley couldn't afford(for a spell last year we had no keeper on the bench)In the end Stanley did give him the opportunity that at the time no other club did......but when Lumley came he had to go ...simple economics.

Re: Jay Lynch
 

If the club don't respond quickly they face the danger of having their ultra smooth, over resourced reputation going down the pan.

By the way the media department is bigger than you think,there's also Dan with an extra Y :D