Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Yeovil Game (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/yeovil-game-66791.html)

Exile on Spencer St 11-12-2014 16:07

Re: Yeovil Game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Potter (Post 1126011)
Coleman is a better manager than Beattie. That isn't to say Beattie is a bad manager (or could become a better one too, over time)

One might hope (no doubt in vain) that Potter's fair summary of the Beattie - Coleman debate would be the last word on the topic.
As some have said, support the club and team, and not just a particular player or manager. The former are forever and the latter are for now.
Back to the challenge of Yeovil anyone...?

baldy 11-12-2014 18:29

Re: Yeovil Game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chubbyman (Post 1125985)
Just a point but Beattie and Stevo wanted O'Sullivan for months but only peanuts was made available,suddenly Coley gets him for I believe many times what was available to Beattie.Many other decent loan deals fell by the wayside for the same reasons.

It was said on here that Coley signed 5 loan players (O'Sullivan, Maguire, Moly, Can't remember the other 2) for the price of what Kayode was costing.

So how was only peanuts made available for Beattie?

Mr Matthew 11-12-2014 19:06

Re: Yeovil Game
 
My 2 penneth worth. Beatttie better at choosing the right players and getting them in.Coley better at the tactics and motivating them. Our first 11 now in my opinion is a lot more solid than the playoff side and Coley will do absolute wonders with them. Promotion next year if we keep the current squad and maybe get in a decent striker. Mark my words.

choirboy 13-12-2014 08:56

Re: Yeovil Game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DAV007 (Post 1125797)
Choirboy

Do you know the reason why Beattie had to rush out of the club?

When you know the facts, you might want to join in.

You still haven't 'enlightened' us yet DAV.
So come on ..... What are The FACTS?:confused:
ps. Are you on the board at Stanley? Because if you are you should not be giving out information discussed at meetings, not even tempting 'half bites' like you are suggesting here!
If you are not on the board then you are involving yourself in 'gossip' and 'useless scandle mongering'.
So come on please do TELL.:idunno:
Where do I stand on this issue?..........
.....On the Clayton End 100% behind the team, the board and the Manager.....whoever that happens to be at the time!
ON STANLEY ON:wave8:


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:48.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com