![]() |
Re: Stanley v York.
We don't normally play that way,did we get dragged into their way of playing?,wasn't surprised with a draw,but must of shown a bit of character to get a point
|
Re: Stanley v York.
We did it from the off, no good blaming York, To be honest when we got the freekick,i said to wynonie hope Joss takes it. Why 2 subs wi 3 mins to go and 2-1 down? Thats not good management by any stretch.
|
Re: Stanley v York.
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley v York.
One point saved is better than nowt but, according to the Beeb website Stanley had 9 shots to York's 19, and only 3/6 on target!
Are those figures an accurate reflection? |
Re: Stanley v York.
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley v York.
Wasn't counting mate, but sounds about right, we were dire.:(
|
Re: Stanley v York.
A bit unfair really, He was on a loser from the minute he stepped on the pitch.
|
Re: Stanley v York.
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley v York.
Your always fair in your assessment redraine and I must admit I've never been a fan of three at the back and wing backs.
For me it creates problems when you come up against three forwards (4-3-3) as your wing backs get pinned back. It's also an easy outlet for the opposition to play into the corners. Young windlass is not an out and out forward so it ends up 3-6-1 !!,or 5-4-1 . Give me 4-3-3 any day,but we would struggle getting all our best players on the pitch so it's a tricky one |
Re: Stanley v York.
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley v York.
Good point, however the attendance figure suggests the crowd have been priced out.
|
Re: Stanley v York.
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley v York.
Not for £20 a time cash unfortunately.
|
Re: Stanley v York.
Quote:
|
Re: Stanley v York.
Quote:
Mid-table in League 2 feels pretty good given my lifetime (64 year) timescale. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:14. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com