Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Stanley v York. (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/stanley-v-york-67183.html)

football19 21-03-2015 18:09

Re: Stanley v York.
 
We don't normally play that way,did we get dragged into their way of playing?,wasn't surprised with a draw,but must of shown a bit of character to get a point

cashman 21-03-2015 18:25

Re: Stanley v York.
 
We did it from the off, no good blaming York, To be honest when we got the freekick,i said to wynonie hope Joss takes it. Why 2 subs wi 3 mins to go and 2-1 down? Thats not good management by any stretch.

Redraine 21-03-2015 18:32

Re: Stanley v York.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by football19 (Post 1136707)
We don't normally play that way,did we get dragged into their way of playing?,wasn't surprised with a draw,but must of shown a bit of character to get a point

Sorry, Football19, but we didn't show much at all, today, especially quality. Windass got us out of gaol and York must be feeling sore that they didn't go home with all 3 points, bad as they were. We were so wasteful of numerous attacking positions and just seemed to pick the wrong options with the final balls into the box. Over hit, under hit, too hurried and no composure. Our two late subs were ridiculous. Ok, I undertand where Coley is coming from when he says the selected 11 should be able to last the full 90 minutes when we are looking good, but not to change things when our play is so dire is beyond belief.We have now conceded more goals than any other team in this division, but Coley said not long ago that our defence is the best he has ever worked with!!! Funny old game.

Exile on Spencer St 21-03-2015 19:12

Re: Stanley v York.
 
One point saved is better than nowt but, according to the Beeb website Stanley had 9 shots to York's 19, and only 3/6 on target!
Are those figures an accurate reflection?

Redraine 21-03-2015 19:36

Re: Stanley v York.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Exile on Spencer St (Post 1136718)
One point saved is better than nowt but, according to the Beeb website Stanley had 9 shots to York's 19, and only 3/6 on target!
Are those figures an accurate reflection?

Don't know, but I can't remember their goalie making any saves.

cashman 21-03-2015 19:38

Re: Stanley v York.
 
Wasn't counting mate, but sounds about right, we were dire.:(

Chrisr 21-03-2015 19:59

Re: Stanley v York.
 
A bit unfair really, He was on a loser from the minute he stepped on the pitch.

Chrisr 21-03-2015 20:03

Re: Stanley v York.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by football19 (Post 1136704)
How did the pitch play Cashy?.i know buzzers missing and this time of the year gets a bit "bobbly"which doesn't suit our style.
Chris,bad example Grey,was brought on with Northampton winning (presumably to hold the ball up)and got beat,whilst windass got us a point !! :)

A bit unfair really he never had a chance from the minute he stepped on the pitch. I think he simply fell foul of the Coleman way.

football19 21-03-2015 20:04

Re: Stanley v York.
 
Your always fair in your assessment redraine and I must admit I've never been a fan of three at the back and wing backs.
For me it creates problems when you come up against three forwards (4-3-3) as your wing backs get pinned back.
It's also an easy outlet for the opposition to play into the corners.
Young windlass is not an out and out forward so it ends up 3-6-1 !!,or 5-4-1 .
Give me 4-3-3 any day,but we would struggle getting all our best players on the pitch so it's a tricky one

football19 21-03-2015 20:06

Re: Stanley v York.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrisr (Post 1136727)
A bit unfair really he never had a chance from the minute he stepped on the pitch. I think he simply fell foul of the Coleman way.

Today I meant Chris !!!,by the way I like him as a player :)

Chewbacca 21-03-2015 20:12

Re: Stanley v York.
 
Good point, however the attendance figure suggests the crowd have been priced out.

cashman 21-03-2015 20:46

Re: Stanley v York.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chewbacca (Post 1136730)
Good point, however the attendance figure suggests the crowd have been priced out.

Disagree, to me the attendance figure suggests we aint winning. A winning side anywhere n crowds come.

smudgie 21-03-2015 20:55

Re: Stanley v York.
 
Not for £20 a time cash unfortunately.

AccyMad 21-03-2015 21:18

Re: Stanley v York.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Exile on Spencer St (Post 1136718)
One point saved is better than nowt but, according to the Beeb website Stanley had 9 shots to York's 19, and only 3/6 on target!
Are those figures an accurate reflection?

Pretty much yeah - very disappointed with our performance but at the end of the day relieved to take a point from the game, it's never pretty against York & good result seeing as though they're fighting for their lives, how much difference 12 months can make, who's have thought they were in play offs last season

Chimer 21-03-2015 21:55

Re: Stanley v York.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrisr (Post 1136703)
I have to say the last few home games have confirmed to me that JC and JB have taken this club as far as they can.

I think it is more accurate to say they have taken the club as far as it can be taken, without another even more loaded fairy godmother - remembering we've had two of those already, one to get us where we are today in the first place, and one to fend the taxman off when the first overreached himself.

Mid-table in League 2 feels pretty good given my lifetime (64 year) timescale.


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:14.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com