Accrington Web
Page 3 of 6 12 3 456
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Donnie Rovers (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/donnie-rovers-68926.html)

cashman 25-02-2017 19:03
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
Though i wasn't at the game today,from what ive seen, think both Rodgers n Beckles will play above League 2 level in next couple of years.

Twenty Eight 25-02-2017 19:09
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by king edwards (Post 1188435)
Just back from Doncaster now, though Jonathan Edwards was outstanding great team performance from the lads, thought Clark was very poor if I'm being honest though think he's out of his depth in league two
Didn't have one of his best today - but who made the first challenge and fed McCartan for the goal ? Who put the pin point set piece on Marty's head to make the second ?
If that had been the golden child ............
He's not out of his depth - he's already played well and got promoted from this division. He's starved of service that's the problem.

king edwards 25-02-2017 19:17
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamF (Post 1188430)
I agree. Total liability that lad.

Hull should release him.

...Then we can sign him up on a 5 year deal - the lad is going to be Championship level minimum
Agree Sam this kid is going to be a very good player IMO he will be in league above us next season or higher

king edwards 25-02-2017 19:18
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twenty Eight (Post 1188437)
Didn't have one of his best today - but who made the first challenge and fed McCartan for the goal ? Who put the pin point set piece on Marty's head to make the second ?
If that had been the golden child ............
He's not out of his depth - he's already played well and got promoted from this division. He's starved of service that's the problem.
All about opinions mate he's decent enough I suppose just not good enough for us in this league but that's only me

Twenty Eight 25-02-2017 19:27
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
Unbelievable.

Lord Didsbury 26-02-2017 00:13
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
Ffs - Rodgers is a very promising player. Good for us in centre of defence.

winstanley asfc 26-02-2017 00:22
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
A great result for the Reds!!:) Here are the goals.
Doncaster 2-2 Accrington | Video | Watch TV Show | Sky Sports

king edwards 26-02-2017 05:54
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Didsbury (Post 1188452)
Ffs - Rodgers is a very promising player. Good for us in centre of defence.
I thought he was excellent yesterday and much more effective at centre half

monkey hanger 26-02-2017 07:38
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twenty Eight (Post 1188429)
I sometimes wonder if I'm at the same game as some fans. Rodgers had a nightmare. At fault for both goals got torn to shreds and bullied out of it.
matty pearson at fault for the second loosing posession neat the half way line. but i suppose that,ll be painted over like adam buxton,s howler last season. that some conveniantly glossed over. overall a great performance from the team and a word of praise for the referee as he was a great comedy relief to the game. if he,d been driving a car the police would have stopped him for potential drink or drugs driving.

Twenty Eight 26-02-2017 08:18
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
I still think he got beat very easily Monkey and should have blocked the ball in. Agreed about Matty as well.

Twenty Eight 26-02-2017 09:49
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
Just had a look at the highlights. I stand by what I said. In fact the second one looks even worse now.

Exile on Spencer St 26-02-2017 10:30
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twenty Eight (Post 1188461)
Just had a look at the highlights. I stand by what I said. In fact the second one looks even worse now.
I wasn't there, but really! The second goal was Rogers' 'fault'?
How was he supposed to mark two men, who were 10 yards apart, on his own and, other than handle the ball and get sent off, prevent the final flick-on reaching the scorer?
Rogers perhaps felt he had to take a central position because Hughes was out of his usual position. If he'd 'marked' the scorer on the left wing then the other Rovers forward wouldn't have made the flick but would have had an unopposed run at the goal.
Difficult to assess from the briefest of clips but it seemed like the entire defence played a part, not to mention Rovers' forwards, in their goals.
But I'm not sure blaming one player is justified.

AccyMad 26-02-2017 10:54
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
Comes to something when we're blaming anyone for only getting one point away at the top of the league - just saying :confused:

king edwards 26-02-2017 10:57
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exile on Spencer St (Post 1188462)
I wasn't there, but really! The second goal was Rogers' 'fault'?
How was he supposed to mark two men, who were 10 yards apart, on his own and, other than handle the ball and get sent off, prevent the final flick-on reaching the scorer?
Rogers perhaps felt he had to take a central position because Hughes was out of his usual position. If he'd 'marked' the scorer on the left wing then the other Rovers forward wouldn't have made the flick but would have had an unopposed run at the goal.
Difficult to assess from the briefest of clips but it seemed like the entire defence played a part, not to mention Rovers' forwards, in their goals.
But I'm not sure blaming one player is justified.
Absolutely bang on

ferret man 26-02-2017 11:09
Re: Donnie Rovers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exile on Spencer St (Post 1188462)
I wasn't there, but really! The second goal was Rogers' 'fault'?
How was he supposed to mark two men, who were 10 yards apart, on his own and, other than handle the ball and get sent off, prevent the final flick-on reaching the scorer?
Rogers perhaps felt he had to take a central position because Hughes was out of his usual position. If he'd 'marked' the scorer on the left wing then the other Rovers forward wouldn't have made the flick but would have had an unopposed run at the goal.
Difficult to assess from the briefest of clips but it seemed like the entire defence played a part, not to mention Rovers' forwards, in their goals.
But I'm not sure blaming one player is justified.
Sean to have seen this trait before. Oops sorry meant to say seem.


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:44.
Page 3 of 6 12 3 456
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com