![]() |
Huddersfield match thread
Bloody hate friendlies and every season I swear I'm not going to any.
I gave my 8 year old the option of which ONE game we'd go to- hoping he'd choose this ... he didn't :( He chose Everton so we'll go to that. But I choose this so we'll do both :) yay for democracy! |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
don't suppose any text comm for we exiles ?
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Wouldnt put it past him, little ******
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Team news
Chapman Matty P Donacien Mark Hughes A trialist Conneely Jordan Clark A trialist Billy Kee A triallist McConville |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
No sub keeper
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
No 8 trialist is Paul Pogba
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
nathan wolland is the sub keeper chaps
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
What happened to Jack Little ? Thought he was a highly rated young keeper?
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Attendance 1663
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Dam,0-1...not good for my multi.
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Gotta say it is a very strong Huddersfield 2nd half
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
From the Examiner:
Accrington have just brought on Rommy Boco - he’s a Benin international, just like Town’s Steve Mounie...Unusual to have two feature in one game in England. |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
In my opinion Huddersfield moved the ball very well, but stanley were more dangerous, the second half though they scored, we were every bit as good,, thought the trialist No5 did very well, hope we sign that lad, the No8 not for me.
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
No.5 was Ben Stephen Everton looked a proper centre half could be a useful signing No.8 not sure who he was was bypassed by their passing game No. 10 again not sure who he was but looked very useful good control and guick Jordan Clarke looked very sharp as did new signing Mcleod did,nt deserve to lose goog workout for both sides.
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Also saw Ryan Scicluna warming up but did,it get on.
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
So annoyed Ince scored have a pathological hatred for him and hope he falls on his over-rated ass this season
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
To be honest i reckon we have nothing at all to fear in Div2,more so even when we add a couple more to the squad, Dont forget Huddersfields lads were worth millions and we acquitted ourselves very well.:)
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
No 5 trialist impressed me with his talking and constant organising alongside Hughes. Looked strong in the air and solid in the tackle. Got caught out late in the 1st half when covering Donacien and got smashed for pace down the wing. Maybe an able alternative to Hughes? But with Sykes, Mohammed and Ogle as youth team graduates I'd be reluctant to offer him a job just as an alternative. Worth another look though.
No 8. Questionable sized shorts, questionable haircut and didnt impose himself. Looked a real unit in the warm up, and his hair drew Pogba comparisons. I thought he looked composed with and without possession to start with but as the half drew on he became less and less involved. Was that the ebb and flow of the game or did he go missing? No 10. Looked a little Lutelish in his play. Hatd to judge really from tuther end but had more to offer than Billy in the 1st half. Size wise he looked like he was going to be nippy, but he had one or two chances to engage the afterburners ... but had forgot to put fuel in. 2nd half Sousa, Boco, Ogle, Sykes, Beckles, Edwards and Brown were the knowns that came on. No 16 (nolan?) in the middle seemed alright, didnt do 'a lot' but probably more than Pogba. I liked the look of no 22 (McCleod?)as well. Looked like Akinfenwas little cousin. He tried to go at the full back every time and was more than willing to chase the ball back if he lost it. Ryan Scicluna and Zaid Mohammed were unused subs. Hard to gauge the team from this BUT I'll stick me neck out and say we'll be no worse than last year. We need someone alongside Conneely and tried 2 tonight and still have the Maltese guy to go at. However, he's not our guy to try to remould but I'd give Edwards a go there. He looks and plays so similarly to Crooks ... We also need a keeper. Chapman made a couple of half decent saves, and I couldnt see the goal enough to comment, but solely based on last season he doesnt give enough confidence to the 4 in front of him. |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
16 was Liam Nolan!
He isn't a bad keeper on his day, just prone to too many errors! https://twitter.com/westerhampete/st...19631530749953 |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
I'm even more confident of our prospects this season after that second half performance. I shall be going down the bookies tomorrow to put a score on us reaching the automatics.
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Hmmm...would've thought the bookies would be offering longer odds than that, as they usually have so little confidence in us. Will have a mooch round tomorrow.
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
After months of closed season speculation, the big day had finally arrived. Yipeeee!!!
Conditions were perfect. Balmy, cloudless summer evening, premier league opposition, new strip & a pitch to rival Wembley. The anticipation was almost unbearable. Imagine my surprise when I walked into the Crown for my pre-match libation, only to find I was the only customer at the bar! Was this a dream? :confused: All around were fans in blue & white sporting all the bravado of the newly promoted anticipating a 8-0 thrashing of their lowly opponents. :eek: By kick-off, the Clayton end was embarrassingly empty. Had the 7.00pm kick off confused the faithful? :confused: It must have, as by half time it had filled up to a more acceptable level although nothing like I had anticipated for such a tasty pre-season appetizer. When the teams took to the field it was a case of spot the old boys, so many new faces were on show. The clubs decision not to name those 'on trial' for their futures was frustrating. Why all the secrecy???? Surely any player deemed fit to wear our shirt deserves a credit on the cast list! The game proved to be the classical cliché - a game of two halves! Despite dominating possession, Huddersfield rarely threatened our goal in the first half & the whole team, including Chapman, put in an excellent defensive display. The second half was a more lively effort & despite their inevitable goal, we created some creditable goal attempts. I thought all of those players named 'a trialist' showed promise & each proved more than worthy of league 2. Huddersfield's superior technical skill ensured the game followed the script, although a draw would have been a fair result after 90 minutes. Bring on Everton at 3.00pm Saturday! Let's hope this time I have to fight my way to the bar! |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
Some people must enjoy long holidays. :rolleyes: |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
[QUOTE=Wynonie Harris;1197322]The irony of comments about low gates from someone who won't be coming anywhere near the club for years to come![/QUOTE
Irony from a Stanley 'fan' who's spoilt for choice as to his options of which other team(s) to support. Surely not. .:rolleyes: |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Are you sure that was his name as searches dont bring anything up at all ?
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
Surprised that your gate was quoted as being just over 1600. Not bad for a friendly...but I suppose the 'udders fans out numbered the Stanley ones....!!!! |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Still at least it wasn't Called off for a butterfly festival like plymouths
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
I've been to one friendly match in 45 years of watching football. I can see why people might want to go (nice weather, cheap, nowt else to do, some new players to see) but I've just never got enthused by them.
Same with european matches, or 99% of premier league matches on the telly.... If I don't feel desperate for my team to win then I ain't bothered. |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
I love to see the trialists and any new signings is why i go, gives an insight to me on the coming season.:) it was annoying though the fact they dont announce who the trialists are.
|
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
A typical example of someone not thinking before putting his fingers on the keyboard. I wish he would either admit he's made a mistake by making such a brash statement or, pack up and leave this forum and join whatever club forum he decides to favour with his flexible loyalty. I for one am sick and fed up of reading his pathetic comments when I know his heart and loyalty aren't with Stanley. |
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't "supporting your club" mean, if it's to mean anything, spending some of your money to the benefit of that club.
And, again unless I've missed something, I don't believe Andy Holt's ownership of the club can be compared in any way to the recent experiences of Orient, Blackpool, Rangers, Coventry, etc, etc, etc. He happens to be the current owner, for which I am glad, but he is not Accrington Stanley. If, for whatever reason, st06nc2, you 'boycott' Stanley by not giving a single penny to the club you are as much a 'fan' as those six year old kids you see in every shopping centre wearing Barcelona shirts. In fact, not even as much as that, as they at least buy a shirt and some of the exorbitant cost goes back to the club. If you do donate financially to the club then good on you. But then is not watching the team just cutting your nose off to spite your face rather than an act of principle. |
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
As I said I don't think this clown gives much thought to what he posts. People have long memories and what ever the future holds for our club and I think the "new dawn" has arrived this season. any future comments st06nc2 happens to post on this forum will be met with reminders of a silly statement he made on this thread. It will in effect return to bite him on the a**e. I still recall statements made by certain individuals on here following the re-appointment of Coley and Jimmy.
|
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
Quote:
I know the public of Accrington are infamous for their apathy, but I never expected to find it on this forum. The club have laid on some excellent friendlies against higher league opposition, all at bargain basement prices. Yet some of the lame excuses being offered by so called Stanley fans for not attending the friendlies make me despair. All I can say is thank goodness the Huddersfield fans didn't adopt the same attitude. 'Naah! Can't be bothered traipsing over to the worst stadium in the EFL for a 7.00pm mid-week kick-off against bleeding Accrington Stanley, think I'll stay at home!' No! They came in their hundreds because they 'support' their club. I know not everyone on here lives locally, but for anyone who does yet couldn't be bothered to turn up because they 'don't do friendlies' then I'm sorry but no! - You can't claim to 'support' Accrington Stanley! |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
They came in their hundreds because ticket stubs for our game got them priority for Crystal Palacr tickets ;)
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Mrs Exile and I are looking forward to seeing Stanley in their friendly with PNE. Will be the first time I've seen those two 'compete' since that glorious Cup replay at Peel Park, many life times ago.
One benefit of attending friendlies is that it puts a bit of cash, however modest, into the club when there is no other source of regular income. For Stanley, reason enough. |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Good on yers me owd mucker.:);)
|
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
If you bother to visit the Terriers website, you'll discover that attendance at our home friendly had no bearing on them getting priority for their PL away games. There are 5 complex levels of priority relating to supporters past attendance that must be met, none of which relate to pre-season friendlies. You've got to be a true supporter to bother coming to watch your team play Stanley in a pre-season friendly. |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thre
I know not everyone on here lives locally, but for anyone who does yet couldn't be bothered to turn up because they 'don't do friendlies' then I'm sorry but no! - You can't claim to 'support' Accrington Stanley![/QUOTE]
think you,re pushing the issue of what is called a supporter of our club. i imagine there are plenty who go to nearly every home game and some away ones as well who don,t bother with friendly games. each to their own for me. go if you want to do but don,t imagine everyone who don,t are no less a supporter of the club. don,t want to go down the line of creating a super fan who never misses any game where stanley are concerned, buy a new shirt ev season and maybe spend more than others on match days. we all support the club in our own ways. |
Re: Huddersfield match thre
[/QUOTE]think you,re pushing the issue of what is called a supporter of our club. i imagine there are plenty who go to nearly every home game and some away ones as well who don,t bother with friendly games. each to their own for me. go if you want to do but don,t imagine everyone who don,t are no less a supporter of the club. don,t want to go down the line of creating a super fan who never misses any game where stanley are concerned, buy a new shirt ev season and maybe spend more than others on match days. we all support the club in our own ways.[/QUOTE]
Surely the definition of a supporter is 'one who supports their club'. After months of no football, what true supporter wouldn't want to see their team play against Premier League opponents? I accept your comments, but can't understand someone who calls themselves a Stanley supporter (& lives locally) not wanting to attend friendlies on the basis that they 'can't be bothered'. If we all adopted that attitude, the club might as well not bother arranging any, as there'd only be away fans at the match. |
Re: Huddersfield match thre
I accept your comments, but can't understand someone who calls themselves a Stanley supporter (& lives locally) not wanting to attend friendlies on the basis that they 'can't be bothered'.
If we all adopted that attitude, the club might as well not bother arranging any, as there'd only be away fans at the match.[/QUOTE] the club arranges these games not for the benefit of fans but as part of getting the squad ready for the season to come. the extra revenue generated by the club is i admit a help. the lack of any competitive needs for these games plus all the substitutions give an unreal feeling to these games. i live 25 miles away but thats not the reason for my non attendance. each to their own mate but don,t decry fans who think like me and don,t attend. |
Re: Huddersfield match thre
[/QUOTE]Surely the definition of a supporter is 'one who supports their club'.
Quite, but what defines "Support" or its parameters? After months of no football, what true supporter wouldn't want to see their team play against Premier League opponents? True supporters? Again who or what defines a "True supporter" I accept your comments, but can't understand someone who calls themselves a Stanley supporter (& lives locally) not wanting to attend friendlies on the basis that they 'can't be bothered'. "Can't be bothered" has many connotations & reasons, so unless you can fully understand the underlying rationalisation of why, judgement shouldn't be so scathing. If we all adopted that attitude, the club might as well not bother arranging any, as there'd only be away fans at the match. And your rational for your final comment is based on ...... ? :)[/QUOTE] A rather emotive subject it appears, but as MH stated, each to their own in their abilities to support as & when & how they can. Shouldn't that be sufficient? I live abroad so can only fit in what fixtures are available when I'm home, I've even juggled my leave around specific periods to maximise my chances of seeing the lads play home & away. If I lived in the UK I suppose I would also be one of the no shows for friendlies, maybe not all but I'd assume the majority because like most folk I've got "other commitments" & as such couldn't just drop everything & swan off to the Footy. Moderation in all things springs to mind & we should all be happy in the fact that folks will turn to as & when they can to support how they can "Our Stanley". |
Re: Huddersfield match thre
In response to the critical posts from DaveinGermany & Monkey Hanger, I would make the following points;
Surely the definition of a supporter is 'one who supports their club'. DiG 'Quite, but what defines "Support" or its parameters?' Football exists as a form of entertainment aimed at attracting fans to watch the game. 'One who supports their club' doesn't do it sitting in an armchair at home! I accept your comments, but can't understand someone who calls themselves a Stanley supporter (& lives locally) not wanting to attend friendlies on the basis that they 'can't be bothered'. DiG "Can't be bothered" has many connotations & reasons, so unless you can fully understand the underlying rationalisation of why, judgement shouldn't be so scathing. Of course there may be many reasons fans can't attend. I didn't criticise anyone who lives away, on holiday, was attending their daughters wedding or going under the knife to have an ingrowing toenail removed - Just those who won't attend because in their own words they 'Can't be bothered!' If we all adopted that attitude, the club might as well not bother arranging any, as there'd only be away fans at the match. DiG 'And your rational for your final comment is based on ...... ?' Simple logic! If we all 'couldn't be bothered', there'd be nobody at the game! MH 'the club arranges these games not for the benefit of fans but as part of getting the squad ready for the season to come.' If that's the only reason, why don't they play them behind closed doors then? It must be very difficult trying to arrange friendlies against higher league clubs. ASFC have gone to great lengths to make these fixtures as attractive as possible & reduced the ticket prices to try & raise much needed revenue. The response from some so called fans - 'I can't be bothered' I wonder how many of the no-show fans would still feel that way if either Manchester United or City were the visitors?????? |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
In reply to your last point Lord S I feel the answer would be roughly the same amount as most supporters I know go to watch our own team & the calibre of the opposition doesn't really matter.
It gets on my wick when people start trying to divide fans according to their, for want of a better word, 'worthiness' - not everyone can go to every game, be it friendlies or otherwise but we're all on the same side, god knows there's few enough of us without making out that some aren't as good a supporter as another! |
Re: Huddersfield match thre
Quote:
Can't we just accept things as they are? Some folk will go to everything, some only to home games & others only to games within their geographical region. If you go to 1 or a 100 games is immaterial, as long as your hearts Stanley because at the end of it all that's what counts .... isn't it? |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
This all goes back to a response to my thoughts on the Huddersfield game from a so-called Stanley 'supporter' who shall remain nameless (post #33), who decided to take one element of my post - about the poor attendance; & make what I felt was a ludicrous & flippant remark. I'm not trying to divide fans, just responding to the apparent apathy evident on some of the posts regarding whether its worth attending friendlies. I'm old enough to remember the 'can't be bothered' apathy that caused the downfall of Stanley in 1962 & it dismays me to see it rearing it's head on this forum. What saddens me more, are the number of contributors who have rushed to defend the 'stay-away fans' & criticise one who is actually supporting the club by bothering to attend these friendlies. :( |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
Tell you what, we (me & the better half) should be over Sept-Oct so we'll be looking to take in a game or several, if you get yourself down to the "Greyhound" on match day were we meet up with the other "Owd Contemptibles" (they know who they are ;)), I'll get you a pint & we can have a natter ..... sound fair? After all, as one ex tory PM & Scuzzbag (although I'm pretty sure he wasn't a Stanleyite) once said "We're all in this together!" KTF Bro, KTF! :D |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Lord S - I'm sure the club will value my support at one of those cold winter midweek must win away matches where there's about 100 of us Can Be Bothereds vociferously shouting the team on - more than a polite pre-season friendly.
Surely a true supporter has the instinct to know where his limited time and effort best serve the club and take appropriate action? |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
Why don't you do us all a favour and go and post your views on the forum of the club you've "chosen" to support next season? |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
[QUOTE=st06nc2;1197561]...I would never stop supporting Stanley I just would not attend games[/QUOTE
By any chance are Third Lanark and New Brighton some of the other options you have for watching footie? God save Accrington Stanley with 'supporters' like you. |
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
[QUOTE=Exile on Spencer St;1197577]
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
[QUOTE=monkey hanger;1197611]
Quote:
|
Re: Huddersfield match thread
[QUOTE=st06nc2;1197612]
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com