Wombles match thread
….. the absence of which speaks absolute volumes
|
Re: Wombles match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Wombles match thread
Back to one upfront at home says it all to me Bishop ineffective on his own saw the line up and stayed at home like a lot of others.
|
Re: Wombles match thread
the line up might not have been to everyones taste me included but the result should have been different if pell and rodgers had put their headed efforts away as they should have done. 2 nil to stanley and i doubt they,d have come back from that.
|
Re: Wombles match thread
Agree that if either of those headers had gone in it would have been a different story. Also missed the Captain second half but having said that Wimbledon seemed to play the conditions better than we did. Both their goals came from keeping it on the floor whereas we became too reliant on the long throw/ corner and hope for a break.
|
Re: Wombles match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Wombles match thread
Can’t blame the weather, the pitch, the ref…Stanley were just b****y awful.
|
Re: Wombles match thread
Most of the so called senior players were way below par last night Conneely, Pell, Hamilton in midfield never got a grip on the game Amankwah was frankly awful ripped apart time and again by a young player with no right foot Bishop isolated at least McConville put a few decent set pieces in rest was forgettable.
|
Re: Wombles match thread
Quote:
|
Re: Wombles match thread
Quote:
Apart from the last 15 minutes - when we were two down - we were poor :( I said it about the Fleetwood game - we were poor then! Something is wrong fundamentally - just not sure what :confused: :confused: One thing I am sure of, two of the players who might have affected the game, spent the night testing the weight load capacity of the seats in the dugouts :D :) :) :) |
Re: Wombles match thread
its obvious to me whats wrong we should be playing with 2 upfront.:mad:even a poor display more chance of scoring.feel sorry for bishop the lad gets called by many when hes on his own and aint hes fault imho.
|
Re: Wombles match thread
[QUOTE=VALAIRIAN;1260813]
I said it about the Fleetwood game - we were poor then! Something is wrong fundamentally - just not sure what :confused: :confused: or the curse of scoring 5 in the previous game against 10 men. or in fleetwoods case keeping a clean sheet when they were playing against 10 also. apart from the missed headers how much ping pong was there going on in their box that stanley didn,t get the important last touch. |
Re: Wombles match thread
Did anybody else notice they had a No. 32 called D. Charles - Darius......?
:) :) :) |
Re: Wombles match thread
WHAT won the 50/50 last night?
|
Re: Wombles match thread
04696 Cashy :)
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:23. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com