Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Stanley v Rovers (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/stanley-v-rovers-72903.html)

keep the faith 12-07-2022 14:42

Stanley v Rovers
 
Coley expressed his disappointment with the team who played the second game on Saturday. I agree enirely but with one exception. Liam Coyle worked his socks off, he gave it 100%.

cashman 12-07-2022 15:29

Re: Stanley v Rovers
 
as soon as i looked who was warming up for the second match i said we would get stuffed,the first game was ours no doubt at all.was only about 3 players good enough i thought.

Twenty Eight 12-07-2022 15:30

Re: Stanley v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by keep the faith (Post 1267294)
Coley expressed his disappointment with the team who played the second game on Saturday. I agree enirely but with one exception. Liam Coyle worked his socks off, he gave it 100%.

I was disappointed with his interview. No need to dig out individuals at this early stage.
Express disappointment with the team but having a pop at named individuals wasn't right in my humble opinion.

cashman 12-07-2022 15:41

Re: Stanley v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Twenty Eight (Post 1267297)
I was disappointed with his interview. No need to dig out individuals at this early stage.
Express disappointment with the team but having a pop at named individuals wasn't right in my humble opinion.

Unless you are stevie wonder it was obvious to most people.

Twenty Eight 12-07-2022 15:49

Re: Stanley v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1267298)
Unless you are stevie wonder it was obvious to most people.

Don't get your point.
Feel for Rodgers and Procter in particular for being spot balled like that.
Some things best kept in the dressing room.

andyd 12-07-2022 16:43

Re: Stanley v Rovers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Twenty Eight (Post 1267297)
I was disappointed with his interview. No need to dig out individuals at this early stage.
Express disappointment with the team but having a pop at named individuals wasn't right in my humble opinion.

I don't like individual,s being named like that although Proctor in my opinion had a mare he wasn't on his own apart from Coyle who worked his socks off the rest were pretty awful but a friendly at the end of the day. Pretty sure Rovers fans weren't happy with the first game plus these 11,s and formation,s surely just experiments. The under 23,s play tonight against Glossop will be interesting to see who plays because on paper we should be favourite,s, and has players get more into the legs has the friendly,s progress perhaps those Coley chose to name can redeem themselves.

Exile on Spencer St 12-07-2022 18:12

Re: Stanley v Rovers
 
Saw photos of Notts and H.Pell esq off the pitch, but is Harry Perrit currently injured?
From what little I’ve seen of him I was hoping he might develop into a useful left back.


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:23.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com