Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Stanley v. York - The Positives (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/stanley-v-york-the-positives-7473.html)

KIPAX 27-01-2005 12:44

Re: Stanley v. York - The Positives
 
Redskin...I don't personally think there is anything wrong in you or anyone else not going to the game for whatever reason... But two minutes after people have stood in the freezing cold watching crap you then tell them you sat at home in the warm.. it winds them up :)

My last post was my sense of humour not a go at ya :)

Sweet.F.A. 27-01-2005 13:07

Re: Stanley v. York - The Positives
 
Quote:

As a moderator I think that your response violates the forum guidelines, could I suggest that you review.
Even moderators have opinions now and then.

Jimbo T Hornblower 27-01-2005 13:09

Re: Stanley v. York - The Positives
 
Hehehe - The question we have to ask now is , Is Redskin Paul Cook? And would he go to the final if we got there? Or would that be all things Disney as well?? :smile: (<== just in case the normal smileys are not being noticed ;) )

Jimbo T :horn8:blower

Redskin 27-01-2005 13:30

Re: Stanley v. York - The Positives
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet.F.A.
Even moderators have opinions now and then.

We want to encourage discussion on this forum and that includes criticism as well as praise - However, silly, mindless criticism of individuals will not to be tolerated and such posts/threads will be deleted.

I think you are missing the point!

Bazf 27-01-2005 13:43

Re: Stanley v. York - The Positives
 
One quick question, How many games to you have to go to so your not classed as a fair weather fan?:confused:

Redskin 27-01-2005 13:53

Re: Stanley v. York - The Positives
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bazf
One quick question, How many games to you have to go to so your not classed as a fair weather fan?:confused:

One by all account, should have kept my mouth shut and bought a wrist band!

Redskin 27-01-2005 13:54

Re: Stanley v. York - The Positives
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet.F.A.
Even moderators have opinions now and then.

Helpful and Knowledgeable?

<TABLE class=tborder cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=5 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=tcat>What Are Moderators?</TD></TR><TR><TD class=alt1>Moderators oversee specific forums. They generally have the ability to edit and delete posts, move threads, and perform other manipulations. Becoming a moderator for a specific forum is usually rewarded to users who are particularly helpful and knowledgeable in the subject of the forum they are moderating.



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

JEFF 27-01-2005 14:42

Re: Stanley v. York - The Positives
 
Quote:

Redskin missed it by choice. not work... something about it being a bit cold
Redskin ADMITTED to missing it by choice and did not make up any excuse for not going to the game. All the others who missed it through "work commitments" will probably do everything they can to get out of "work commitments" for the Halifax league game, but probably did not try as hard to get out of their "work commitments" for a GLS cup game. All the attendances for the GLS cup were rubbish, not just Stanley's. Everybody has a choice, and just because some fans don't go to every game does not make them any less a supporter.

KIPAX 27-01-2005 15:03

Re: Stanley v. York - The Positives
 
Quote:

Everybody has a choice, and just because some fans don't go to every game does not make them any less a supporter.
thanks for quoting me Jeff.. I did explain in the very next post that it was meant as humour and no way having a go and that I have never and will never have a problem wiht people missing matches for whatever reason they want... I wouldn't even presume to judge anyone else and don't see how others can...

My point was that people who did stand there braving the cold watching crap, maybe dont like hearing about others who stayed at home in the warm... A fair point I think :) there reaction maybe over the top but hey...its just a messageboard :)

Cafu01 27-01-2005 16:15

Re: Stanley v. York - The Positives
 
and what about the people who have to go on the pitch at half time, it was freezin hehehe

stantrotter 28-01-2005 07:45

Re: Stanley v. York - The Positives
 
I went to the match on Tuesday as a comitted Stanley supporter. I work most Saturdays and a lot of Tuesday evenings out of necessity not choice. I have a mortgage to pay and a family to support. Whenever i am not working and Stanley are playing I go to the game. It doesn't matter if it is a so called "mickey mouse" cup or not I will be there home or away. I do not consider myself a fair weather supporter, and object to being bracketed as one because of work committments. I also believe in choice I will not condemn anyone who chooses not to go to a game for whatever reason. Where was everyone just before Christmas when we played at Leigh just down the road. Where you all christmas shopping perhaps?

Wynonie Harris 28-01-2005 08:03

Re: Stanley v. York - The Positives
 
Although I'm usually the first one to complain about low gates, I don't think Tuesday's attendance is as worrying as it first appears. As Jeff has said, other club's gates in this competition were low. Morecambe attracted 406, Northwich 259, Tamworth 412, Forest Green 223 and Gravesend 240. It's obvious that the GLS cup has failed to capture the imagination of the average supporter, so let's not panic too much.

fettler 29-01-2005 12:08

Re: Stanley v. York - The Positives
 
how very silly chaps, we all support the same team in our own way.


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:24.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com