Quote:
Originally Posted by kestrelx
If he serves at least 10 years that means he could be out when he's 29 which means he still would have part of his youth left ( youth meaning he'll still be young) What the law should do in these cases, because he took the life of someone, then the law should take his life, if not literally, then at least take away the quality of his life, in that he be let out when he is at least 40 years old and those youthful years lost for ever. To me that is fit punishment.
|
dunno im 41, and dont feel "over the hill, plenty of time left for me to have a life!
4 kids all over the age of 16 now, i think im still "young enough", that i could get rid of mrs church (she wishes), and get a new one and have more children
be 18 before id turn 60, and possibly have another 23 marriage with someone else
so if they argument is just take away their youth, i suppose its relative
being released @ 40, 11 years of 3 square meals access to free gym equipment, education could work out well for some.