[churchfcrules]

i seem to remember something about Martin Mcguiness, he was claiming benefits, although he had been elected as a british mp, but refused to take up the post on political grounds, but still continued to claim benefits

and gerry adams was also claiming benefits, as "unemployed barman"

should you be allowed to refuse work and continue claiming benefits, and where do we draw the line?
religious belief? political beliefs? moral beliefs?, are these things not the same?

and how far would thinks have to go,before we "ditched" our morals, who was it that said"we are only nine meals from anarchy'