Quote:
Originally Posted by Less
I can agree with you, but more than we can know, unfortunately this 'terrible' woman, should she have been picked up earlier by our caring society?
It's not as if it's the first time she's shall we say been a little peculiar?
She seems to have some fear of pregnancy, perhaps child birth? She certainly doesn't seem maternal.
I can't imagine the pain of child birth, but to put yourself through an abortion at such a late stage?
Why? Unless you're ill? Horrid.
 |
Also, the pain of childbirth is often said to be worse in a still birth if it WAS a stillbirth-a baby will naturally TRY to be born, it will work its way down the birth canal. A dead one won't.
An abortion inducing drug is quite different to a labour inducing one!The former usually has a first stage dose that stops the foetus from thriving, then a second one to make the body give birth to it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lindsay ormerod
I agree with Sugarmouse on this, and I'm confused too. If (and it's a big if as far as I can see) the baby was born dead then she has nothing to gain by hidings it's whereabouts now. I suspect there is more to this, that she has actually killed the baby and that's the reason behind her not revealing the body. Would also suggest that her husband ( who is apparently standing by her through this) gets himself some new specs or starts taking a lot more notice of what's going on, can only think that they didn't have a very close relationship if he missed that baby bump. |
I agree, regards killing the baby. A dead baby was found in Bradford around the same time or slightly before it became knowledge-can only assume the police have dismissed any connection.
And yes, if I developed a baby bump I would be rather concerned if a husband did not notice. Maybe she told him she'd eaten too many pies recently...