Accrington Web - View Single Post

maccawozzagod · 25-11-2012, 11:52

I can only assume that 'average' is taken from looking at the league table?

Not the worst match report I've ever read (and had an obvious Kent bias) but I can't agree that Gillingham were firmly on top in the first half. True they had more efforts than we did, but they were hitting balls at the target from all over. Once in a while they go in as worldy's but more often than not they miss ... and yesterday they missed. On balance of play I thought the one goal lead was harsh on Stanley. 2nd half I missed most of it whilst walking home with my frozen four year old but the noise from the crowd suggested a shift in balance and Dans commentary seemed to back that up. Top it all with 'backs to the wall' and 'siege' comments from the Gills forums and I've got to think they were lucky to get even a point.

25-11-2012, 11:52	#5
maccawozzagod God Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Red and White Fortnight Posts: 9,110 Liked: 1555 times Rep Power: 12677	Re: Match Report from the Priestfield end I can only assume that 'average' is taken from looking at the league table? Not the worst match report I've ever read (and had an obvious Kent bias) but I can't agree that Gillingham were firmly on top in the first half. True they had more efforts than we did, but they were hitting balls at the target from all over. Once in a while they go in as worldy's but more often than not they miss ... and yesterday they missed. On balance of play I thought the one goal lead was harsh on Stanley. 2nd half I missed most of it whilst walking home with my frozen four year old but the noise from the crowd suggested a shift in balance and Dans commentary seemed to back that up. Top it all with 'backs to the wall' and 'siege' comments from the Gills forums and I've got to think they were lucky to get even a point.