[GEaston]

I think keeping him alive against his wishes is money well spent. Not only should we not be having a hearing to listen to his rights, but I personally think human testing should replace animal testing of products with cases like his. Why should monkeys, cats and rabbits be used for the testing of new cosmetics and chemicals when we have Ian Brady?

He would provide a more accurate test result, society would get some return and fewer animals would be harmed.

Am I alone in having what many will argue are extreme views of what to do with child killers ?