Quote:
Originally Posted by GEaston
The fact that Less and Cashman's "credits" represents only the last 6 months makes it even worse. Lol, if all those posts were made in just the last 6 months then the situation for you is worse that I thought. Might want to think "why do so few people like what I have to say" and you can start by looking at the language and vitriol that you throw. As you can tell it doesn't matter to me what you think, but I'm sure it chases others away.
|
Perhaps you have hit on a very important way of deciding who should and who should not get a pay rise?
It is a system that I and most long standing users of the internet take for granted, in fact only a few people take any real notice of it, however it may be the fairest way of judging our elected representatives.
When we have spent hours enthralled by the antics within the house on the BBC parliamentary channel we hit the red button go down a list of MP's present, (don't worry it is usually a very small list), and press the yellow button to select the MP we consider the best of the day?
Or would the MP's that don't get many likes become obsessive about the one's that have the most points and try to use the system against them?
Too trivial? a rather silly suggestion that what a person is like can be gleaned from this method?
Well yes, I think so as well, but there are some here in the virtual world that actually do attempt to use a little bit of fun just for that sort of purpose, are these people to be condemned or pitied for their stupid behavior?
I personally would pity anyone that thinks there is any importance whatsoever in such a system.
I really must stop thinking for myself it hurts, far better I leave such things to superior beings!