Accrington Web - View Single Post

Gremlin · 24-12-2013, 20:07

I did read it Margaret and below is a copy of the last part translated from German.

With DECT phones, the SAR for the head below 0.1 W / kg. The recommended exposure limit of 2.0 W / kg is thus undercut by a multiple. According to the state of science at national and international level, although there is evidence of biological effects, but no evidence that high-frequency electromagnetic fields - the basis of the operation of DECT phones - cause health damage. This applies provided that the limits are adhered to. Also a special hazard to pulsed signals, which is repeatedly cited, could not be demonstrated so far on a scientific basis.

IRMC.

24-12-2013, 20:07	#27
Gremlin Senior Member+ Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: neerabeer Posts: 2,345 Liked: 2146 times Rep Power: 43735	Re: Telephone extension I did read it Margaret and below is a copy of the last part translated from German. With DECT phones, the SAR for the head below 0.1 W / kg. The recommended exposure limit of 2.0 W / kg is thus undercut by a multiple. According to the state of science at national and international level, although there is evidence of biological effects, but no evidence that high-frequency electromagnetic fields - the basis of the operation of DECT phones - cause health damage. This applies provided that the limits are adhered to. Also a special hazard to pulsed signals, which is repeatedly cited, could not be demonstrated so far on a scientific basis. IRMC. __________________ Gremlin R.T.