Quote:
Originally Posted by g jones
We are talking about an inquiry going back decades. Can't see it happening today. Begs a question about nostalgia?
I refused to sign the 3rd party inquiry not because I didn't want an inquiry but because they wanted to bounce people and it was unclear what options were the best (judicial of non judicial for eg), the scope and direction, ie wandering off in wrong direction, investigating individuals and accidentally compromising their potential conviction (police job?) or parliamentRy inquiry about collective responsibility. Whether it would run for years, a year or months? Lots of fair questions that needed answers before going further. Also needed to make sure innocent people weren't named and destroyed because people want names.
Of course they said I didn't want an inquiry because I didn't sign THEIR petition which was untrue and for an organisation supposedly seeking the truth rather spoilt their credibility. Signing up to such an org doesnt sound a good idea to me even if the cause is worthy. Some MPs signed it just to get them off their backs. Surely that can't be right either?
|
We are talking about people that used power and influence to get away with sex crimes against children, I doubt that those abused will be calling their memories anything like nostalgia.
As I write this you are still on line, so can I ask are you for or against the conviction of anyone that has abused children no matter how long ago it was.
Or
Have you become someone that thinks one law for the powerful and just screw (physically and metaphorically) the innocent.
Stop dithering and giving us bull, why are you against catching and punishing these wrongdoers?
