Quote:
Originally Posted by Accyexplorer
Less,Whatever I've addressed Margaret as (be it Margaret,'M' or even baroness pilkington) it's always been with the upmost respect, hence why I assume your just trying to stir the pot.
|
Yet again you assume, therefore I must be guilty, just like the Royals and all celebrities, because you say so, not because you can prove so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Accyexplorer
As for Cliff, he's that far in with and the establishment, I doubt he will even be found guilty but in my eyes he's a wrong un.
Your right,obviously,I have no actual evidence of his guilt except what I have read on the internet (I know,that doesn't make him guilty (in the eyes of the law) ).
|
Perhaps he won't be found guilty, perhaps it won't even come to trial? Perhaps he actually is innocent? I don't know, but unlike you I won't slander him on site the way you and your 'no smoke without fire' ideology does.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Accyexplorer
Anyway, If there was any dodgy things on his PC, then he would of had ample time to remove it. He has 'allegedly' known about the allegations for a while.
|
If there were dodgy things? Again because you assume he is guilty you assume he has a computer filled with what?
If he has known for a while, allegedly or not, it is not right for you to speculate in your own narrow, biased, fashion what may or may not be on his PC.
It would appear that it is alright in your mind to make up your own version of the truth and spread this poison over the web, but what if all the hurtful things you say are completely wrong and you are wrongly accusing an innocent person?
Will you come back on and issue a complete apology for any harm you may have caused? Of course not, because you don't think your doing any harm do you?
I hope your speculations about the man are wrong, they might not be, but you do seem to get a great deal of pleasure, (my speculation) from calling all those in the public eye wrong un's.