Quote:
Originally Posted by DAV007
Please explain where I have sought to expose a 'great evil' or where I stated Stanley have acted incorrectly?
We have not been told what Lynchs 'behaviour' was that would be unacceptable?
Lynch has provided a independent news paper with his version of events, Stanley have not challenged them nor provided an alternative story.
Shakermaker, stop burying your head in the sand.
|
Dav he had to be let go....simple economics. Stanley had four keepers, even if he played for free there's all the invisible expenses and insurances.It would seem Stanley may have to play Joe Lumley as long as he's not injured or if not have to pay a percentage of his salary as has happened with loan players in the past,just a hunch,maybe Mr T could enlighten us if he's allowed to.