Quote:
Originally Posted by DAV007
That's fine, but it would appear Mr.Lynch was told one thing by the club but the club acted differently.
Also, whose fault cease it forcgivong the young lad an opportunity and a bit of hope without fully analysing the finances?
I can understand why the lad feels hard done by, likewise I would rather the club was financially sound instead of having a wage budget it can't afford.
Fans having a pop at Lynch are out of order.
|
I think i'm right in saying he arrived before the Lumley deal was completed,or perhaps fully sanctioned(as a stand in keeper until Dawber was fully fit).After Lumley arrived he'd be 3rd choice at best,a luxury Stanley couldn't afford(for a spell last year we had no keeper on the bench)In the end Stanley did give him the opportunity that at the time no other club did......but when Lumley came he had to go ...simple economics.