View Single Post
Old 26-08-2015, 10:46   #60
Gordon Booth
Senior Member+
 

Re: Water contamination (Lancashire)

Quote:
Originally Posted by accyman View Post
my point is that before they pay shareholders they shuold ensure the system is safe, secure , repaired and updated or upgraded when needed.You dont end up on watchdog repeatedly because your doing an outstanding job

we all pay water rates or water meters so we should all expect safe clean water and for problems to be sorted quickly .
From 2010 to 2015 UU have spent £3,600,000,000 on replacing old pipes, improving water quality, sewage quality, sea water quality etc. That's a few water bills spent!

The Franklaw plant is now supplying clean water but there are 2,500 miles of pipes to flush out, some of them 3 or 4 feet in diameter.. That will only happen as the customers run it off although how they'll check if each customers supply is clear I don't know.

And no, I haven't got shares in UU, but they're spending a lot more than the local water boards ever spent.

Last edited by Gordon Booth; 26-08-2015 at 10:48.
Gordon Booth is offline   Reply With Quote