Quote:
Originally Posted by Accyexplorer
You think I talk sh*te,Scameron has said bombing IS in Syria will make the UK safer 
David Cameron says bombing IS in Syria to make UK \'safer\'
Would us helping to bomb Syria really make a difference? Hmmm
I know folk may not be as pro war as I like to imply but believing Cameron is stupidity.
Its more a case of Cameron being desperate to be seen to be playing with the big boys I think.
For me,It would be nice if Daeshy Dave put the defence of the realm first and stopped playing war...
...In simple terms,stop funding these BS invasions and put that money into border security and eradicating the domestic threat in this country |
Yeah you do talk garbage!
I'm no Tory..but...
If you actually looked at what was said, as opposed to using a badly translated asian commentary ripped from a poor Daily Mirror opinion piece
Full text of David Cameron's memorandum on Syria airstrikes | Politics | The Guardian
You would see (on page 9 of the above) from what was actually said..that Cameron states that Airstrikes alone will not defeat IS. (everyone and his brother with a modicum of sense knows that dropping conventional bombs randomly on a populace doesn't work (a lesson learned from events like the London blitz and napalming Vietnam amongst others)...
Cameron is a lot of things, but an idiot is not one of them. And even if he did use the phrase 'make us safer' during verbal sparring across the house, where every single word is analysed to death..he would have meant it in terms of strategic bombing of supply lines, or front line troops in support of friendly ground troops advancing.
Personally I'm more annoyed at Corbyns stance (and I've defended him a few times previously), I'm reminded of Denis Healey banging on about 'jingoism' whilst our guys were shedding blood in the Falklands...and we all know what happened to the Labour party at the following election.
Oh and Airstrikes are not 'invasions' they are 'interdictions'