Quote:
Originally Posted by maccawozzagod
The main cause of concern is that the people are losing their access rights to a public field and once it is fenced off then that is the end of the dog crapping, or whatever else. At this point it is unknown exactly what the plans are - so they are getting irate about something they may not need to get irate about at this point.
|
I believe dogs should be banned from all playing pitches so for me the dog thing isn't an issue.
I think the biggest sensible argument is that the local residents are losing free access to their field. I'm interested to see how the Trust handle that problem when the plans are available.
As for them getting irate, people usually do when they don't know the facts. They assume the worst and are easily persuaded everything will be bad.
The Trust must know how they plan to deal with the locals access to land issue. It must have been discussed a long time ago and the fact it hasn't been explained makes me feel there won't be any free access.