|
Re: De Lacey family
Our research has come on in leaps and bounds after we were given a year's subscription to Ancestry. The access to census records is invaluable but I am not as excited about the numerous member family trees.
Many of the ones relevant to us contain far too many errors to be taken seriously.
They are useful in suggesting possible connections but it would appear that many of them are copied en masse without checking the facts.
There is a really good example in our Lofthouse group where a man is shown to have married his brother, 3 years before he was born.
|