Quote:
Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington
And that would work....would it?
Employers have a choice....they can employ a candidate or not employ them.(depending on the criteria for the post). Sometimes a candidate may fulfil all the criteria, but not get the job...that is just how it goes.
At interview the questions asked by the interviewer usually fit a format(unless it is a small business employer...these usually go on what they need the employee to be able to do...and whether they will fit in) the format is usually weighted to weed out those who are not suitable.
When you employ someone you always hope that they will fulfil the role well, and that they will stay.
There are many reasons why you may lose an employee....and you have to accept that not all your choices will be good ones.
|
It would work just as well as fast tracking someone unsuitable into a position they can't handle because of race/sexual bias 'just to even the playing field' (which it doesn't) or someone over-qualified taking the food/work out of the hands of somebody that deserves the job because not only would they be suitable but would stay and be an asset to the company employing them.
Perlease, if you've worked hard and have proved your qualities you should not be pushed aside by fast tracking AND some one that has been pushed aside should not **** on someone less qualified by taking their job just to keep a C.V. full, real quality will find a way without hardship being forced downward.