Quote:
Originally Posted by Twenty Eight
Agreed mate.
I thought first half he did a great job especially nullifying Grigg at set pieces ..... the choice of language “couldn’t be bothered” is disgusting.
Anyway here’s a question for Lord Stiff.
In your words describe the first goal we conceded and what you thought over Donacien’s involvement.
If you’re going to throw that accusation around let’s do it to everyone shall we ?
Why not stick to a mass of positives we take from the game ?
|
You're entitled to disagree, but I suggest you read my post again.
I described it as a great game of football & that the whole team played well.
If that's not positive, I don't know what is?
I am not the only one who thought Conneely's performance was under par.
It wasn't just the half-hearted effort to reach the pass which resulted from their equaliser, he was robbed of the ball a couple of times because he took an age to decide what to do with it.
Yes, Donacien made an error for their 1st goal but otherwise played well.
I was proud to be a Stanley fan last night, but I still feel Conneely was our 'weakest link' in an excellent team performance.