Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Didsbury
Not top alphabetically, Cashy.
Think if you bothered to look you’ll see his policy of not using subs means we are about 4th overall in Teams that have done better in the second half.
I’m pretty sure, over the years I’ve watched, that his policy of not using subs has served us well in terms of results. It’s easy to remember those games where he didn’t make a sub and we didn’t win, but what about those where he made no sub and we still went on to win? I bet those are soon forgotten.
I don’t get why people want subs. It generally means replacing a good player with an inferior one.
|
it dont matter how good a player is, if he aint at the races then its better to change him imho.also he has won games not using a sub,its common sense that, as your printing facts, how many times have we actually got away doing that?