Has any government quango ever had such an inappropriate acronym as SAGE?
Sage by name, stupid by nature.
Btw, of those who would allow their names to be listed, there are 86 members of SAGE. And that’s not counting the seven sub-groups. With those numbers it can only be totally unmanageable. Is it any wonder pronouncements and guidance seemS to swing from week to week.
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...ted-sub-groups