Quote:
Originally Posted by Less
The avaricious never fund anything, they always play with other people's money so that their 'little' nest egg is always safe.
|
Maybe, Less, but I was thinking of, amongst others, Neil Ferguson and Bill Gates as examples of my latter two categories.
Here’s an extract from one article I came across.
https://evolveconsciousness.org/neil...to-bill-gates/
You recall Ferguson’s much derided code was for a flu model made in 2005 for Taiwan. When he was rumbled, rather than open up the code for others in the field to review and help influence any actions governments were taking, Ferguson chose to go to Microsoft instead. Why? To re-write the code and make it better. So no one actually got to see the original bad code used to make a bad model that governments used to lock everyone down. Since when is Microsoft the experts to model epidemics? Fishy stuff.
Of all actions he could have taken, he went running to Microsoft, not other experts in field to properly model the pandemic. That’s interesting. Why?
Could it be due to some loyalty or influence related to Microsoft? Maybe the founder of Microsoft Bill Gates?
The Gates Foundation funded Imperial College at various times. Look at the coincidence of the timing for the 29-fold (29x) increase in funding.
In 2010, $2 million was given to Imperial College
In March 2020, $79 million was provided to Imperial College.
The avaricious may be happy to fund fund others when it will help them amass even more billions.