Accrington Web - View Single Post

garinda · 08-03-2005, 17:24

Good to disagree, lol!
Children should be socilised by the age of four. Would the same children have been excluded if they had been raised better- no .But the same child, given a different start would have a chance not to have been labelled 'thick'. Thats what l objected to.
Look at Prince Harry, best education etc.- and a more well rounded individual making the most of very little natural abilities, you'd be pushed to meet! Lol.

08-03-2005, 17:24	#23
garinda Give, give, give member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Overlookin' ducks & geese Posts: 32,411 Blog Entries: 293 Liked: 27 times Rep Power: 16469	Re: The Escaping of Yet More Worms From Cans Good to disagree, lol! Children should be socilised by the age of four. Would the same children have been excluded if they had been raised better- no .But the same child, given a different start would have a chance not to have been labelled 'thick'. Thats what l objected to. Look at Prince Harry, best education etc.- and a more well rounded individual making the most of very little natural abilities, you'd be pushed to meet! Lol. __________________ 'If you're going to be a Kant, be the very best Kant there is my son.' Johann Georg Kant, father of Immanuel Kant, philosopher.